Jump to content

Feminizam & renesansa: Žene će roditi revoluciju


Recommended Posts

Posted
Quote

A Facebook group called Mia Moglie (“My Wife”) had over 32,000 men sharing photos of their wives and partners - often without their knowledge or consent.

This wasn’t strangers lurking in the dark.
It was husbands. Partners. The very people women should be able to trust most.

And yet their images - sometimes stolen, sometimes edited with AI - became fuel for humiliation, objectification, and sexual commentary.

This is misogyny in its rawest form: women reduced to trophies, bodies traded for male validation.

What makes it worse? Big Tech knew. The group existed for years before public outrage forced Meta to act. By then, tens of thousands of men had taken part.

Women deserve more than after-the-fact apologies. We deserve protection, dignity, and platforms that treat our safety as a priority, not an afterthought.

 

JE-BO-TE.

 

Pa dabogda sve izgorilo. 

  • Ruke su vam krvave! 1
Posted

Mislila sam da će nakon Žizel Peliko doći do neke promjene u glavama belosvetskih muževa, ali jok, među nama - i njima - je još uvijek previše sociopata koji žene ne posmatraju kao osobe. 

Jebemti svi. 

  • Ruke su vam krvave! 1
Posted

Poserem se na Ministarstvo "pravde" koje, umesto da promeni definiciju silovanja, u krivični zakonik uvodi delo "Obljuba bez pristanka", za koje se dobijaju manje kazne.

  • Ruke su vam krvave! 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, DameTime said:

Poserem se na Ministarstvo "pravde" koje, umesto da promeni definiciju silovanja, u krivični zakonik uvodi delo "Obljuba bez pristanka", za koje se dobijaju manje kazne.

 

Aflatoksin style. Idioti.

  • Like 1
  • Ruke su vam krvave! 1
Posted

Živo me zanima kako će idioti da diferenciraju silovanje od tog novog dela jer definicija silovanja je spoj dva elementa: 1. koitus i 2. prinuda (koja ne mora biti fizička). Čim nema pristanka znači da je u pitanju prinuda = radi se o školskom primeru silovanja.

 

Ovo je vrlo opasno jer u krivičnom pravu ako se zaprećena kazna snizi, ona se primenjuje i na već postojeće okrivljene, dakle primenjuje se propis koji je najpovoljniji za okrivljenog. 

  • Like 3
Posted

Potpuno jezivo.


Znam da su se neke organizacije alarmirale i pokušavaju preko međunarodnog pritiska da ovo ne uspe (kad već unutar zemlje nema više mehanizama. CEPRIS je pokušavao da napravi normalnu javnu raspravu), ali i oni su sa jako skromnim sredstvima. Uništavanje civilnog društva u Srbiji tek dolazi na naplatu.

Posted

"Light silovanje" kako ga je prekrstio autonomni ženski centar.

Dakle žena koja se ne bude opirala (a takvih je po mom iskustvu 90%) će podleći toj novoj definiciji, a velika većina ih je u braku ili zajednici.

 

Silovanje je već dovoljno traumatično za žrtvu i ako takav slučaj lajt silovanja ikad stigne do suda, mogu misliti reakciju žene na pitanje advokata "a zašto se niste branili".

 

I ko je uopšte u tom ministarstvu?

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Odličan članak, u sridu

 

Shocked by Epstein’s birthday book? That culture was everywhere before feminism

 

Quote

"I was there. I kept the receipts. I remember how normalized the sexual exploitation of teenage girls and even tweens by adult men was, how it showed up in movies, in the tales of rock stars and “baby groupies”, in counterculture and mainstream culture, how normalized rape, exploitation, grooming, objectification, commodification was.

The last Woody Allen movie I ever saw was Manhattan, in which he cast himself as more or less himself, a dweeb in his mid-40s, dating a high school student played by Mariel Hemingway. She was my age, 17, and I was only too familiar with creeps, and the movie creeped me out, even though it was only long afterward that I read that she said he was at the time pressuring her to get sexually involved with him in real life.

Manhattan came out in 1979; two years earlier Roman Polanski, on the pretext that he was taking photographs for French Vogue, got a 13-year-old girl to come alone to a house, where he drugged and raped her vaginally and anally. The probation officer assigned to him wrote: “There was some indication that circumstances were provocative, that there was some permissiveness by the mother,” and “that the victim was not only physically mature, but willing”. In her own account, the girl had said no repeatedly and even pretended to have an asthma attack to try to dissuade him, but the probation officer was of his era and only too willing to blame a drugged child. That was normal then."

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...