[USA] SJEDINJENE AMERIČKE DRŽAVE - unutrašnja politika i uticaj na svetska kretanja

[Kronostime]

1 hour ago, Darko said:

Zašto? Ako je čovek na zemlji posle prva 2-3 metka ... kako je mogao da dobije 40+ metaka u telo posle toga, kada je svakom policajcu potrebno bar 5-6 sekundi da ispali 6 metaka (metak * 5-6 sekundi * osam policajaca), i to pretpostavljajući da svaki metak pogodi metu? Zamišljam scenario ali mi ne pada na pamet, sem jednog užasnog.

Ako policajac ili bilo ko puca iz automatskog oruzja: prva 3-4 metka ce ici precizno iu metu, ostali se rasipaju zbog trzanja oruzja pri pucanju.

40+ metaka je mogao da dobije samo iz blizine klasicnim streljanjem.

 

Edited July 16, 2022 by Kronostime

[Darko]

1 hour ago, Kronostime said:

Ako policajac ili bilo ko puca iz automatskog oruzja: prva 3-4 metka ce ici precizno iu metu, ostali se rasipaju zbog trzanja oruzja pri pucanju.

40+ metaka je mogao da dobije samo iz blizine klasicnim streljanjem.

 

To je jedina mogućnost koju ja vidim, pucao sam i ja iz automatskog oružja (u Nevadi doduše, turistička zamka haha). A i svako ko je igrao FPS igrice bi trebao da zna. Zato se i puca u bursts, zbog trzanja. 

[Kronostime]

6 minutes ago, Darko said:

To je jedina mogućnost koju ja vidim, pucao sam i ja iz automatskog oružja (u Nevadi doduše, turistička zamka haha). A i svako ko je igrao FPS igrice bi trebao da zna. Zato se i puca u bursts, zbog trzanja. 

M70 (Kalasnjikov) pri rafallnoj palbi - prva 3 metka su precizna.

M53  - prvih 5

M48 - svaki.

[Angelia]

Dolazimo do toga da se pocelo sa podizanjem tuzbi za slobodu govora 

 

 

[Dragan]

On 7/15/2022 at 5:59 AM, Baby said:

Da li iko misli da ce nekog ko je neodogovoran prema sebi i ide na abortuse svako malo, ukidanje abortusa naterati da bude ozbiljan prema sebi i prema drugima? 

Стопе абортуса по земљама 2022

 

Можда изненађујуће, студије показују да су стопе абортуса често веће у земљама у којима је абортус илегалан него у земљама у којима је легалан. То је зато што је абортус лакше доступан у богатијим, развијенијим земљама , где је мања вероватноћа да ће жене доживети непланирану трудноћу – великим делом зато што су контрола рађања и правилно сексуално образовање такође широко доступни, а сексуални злочини су ређи.

Насупрот томе, жене у земљама у развоју и најмање развијеним земљама , које имају смањен приступ контроли рађања и образовању, али које су чешће жртве сексуалних злочина, имају три пута већу вјероватноћу да доживе непланирану трудноћу. Ипак, 93 одсто земаља са најрестриктивнијим законима о абортусу су земље у развоју.

Као резултат ових фактора, тржиште абортуса је веће у неразвијеним земљама чак и када је абортус законски забрањен. Без правних средстава, труднице у овим земљама често се обраћају нелиценцираним и илегалним клиникама за абортус да би извршиле абортус. Илегални абортуси су опаснији од легалних, јер их обично спроводе људи са мање обучености, а носе веће ризике и компликације, укључујући ризик од смрти мајке. На крају, према Светској здравственој организацији, отприлике 45% свих абортуса је небезбедно , а 97% тих небезбедних абортуса се обавља у земљама у развоју.

 

10 земаља са највишом стопом абортуса (годишње на 1000 жена)

Русија - 53,7 (2004)

Вијетнам - 35,2 (2000)

Казахстан - 35,0 (2004)

Естонија - 33,3 (2005)

Белорусија - 31,7 (2004)

Румунија - 27,8 (2004)

Украјина - 27,5 (2004)

Летонија - 27,3 (2004)

Куба - 24.8 (2004)

Кина - 24,0 (1998)

 

Сједињене Државе имају стопу абортуса од 20,8 абортуса на 1.000 жена

PS - In 2019, approximately 19% of U.S. pregnancies (excluding spontaneous miscarriages) ended in abortion.

According to the United Nations' 2013 report, only nine countries in the world have a higher reported abortion rate than the United States. They are: Bulgaria, Cuba, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Romania, Russia, Sweden, and Ukraine.

 

10 земаља са најнижим стопама абортуса (годишње на 1000 жена)

Мексико - 0.1 (2003)

Португал - 0.2 (2002)

Катар - 1.2 (2004)

Аустрија - 1.3 (2001)

Индија - 3.1 (2001)

Јужна Африка - 4,5 (2000)

Грчка - 5.0 (1999)

Хрватска - 5,7 (2004)

Швајцарска - 7,3 (2004) PS - [ 6,7 (2021.) ]

Белгија - 7,5 (2003)

 

 

Edited July 16, 2022 by Dragan

[MeanMachine]

Policija Uvalde-a nije krenula u akciju i kad je stigao specijalni odred, likovi sa teskim pancirima, dugim cevima i balistickim stitovima. Jok setkali se tamo vamo cini mi se 20minuta na osnovu novog snimka.

 

Dakle cak i sa takvom balistickom zastitom opet im nije svejedno da ulete u ucionicu gde se nalazi lik sa AR-15 puskom.

 

 

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

 

Ova zena je nepresusni izvor gluposti. 

[Darko]

11 hours ago, MeanMachine said:

Policija Uvalde-a nije krenula u akciju i kad je stigao specijalni odred, likovi sa teskim pancirima, dugim cevima i balistickim stitovima. Jok setkali se tamo vamo cini mi se 20minuta na osnovu novog snimka.

 

Dakle cak i sa takvom balistickom zastitom opet im nije svejedno da ulete u ucionicu gde se nalazi lik sa AR-15 puskom.

 

 

Slažem se, samo ne razumem kakve veze to ima sa ubistvom onog lopova koji je popio 46 metka od policajaca? Ili nisi nameravao da bude veze, izvini ako nisam razumeo. 

[MeanMachine]

14 minutes ago, Darko said:

Slažem se, samo ne razumem kakve veze to ima sa ubistvom onog lopova koji je popio 46 metka od policajaca? Ili nisi nameravao da bude veze, izvini ako nisam razumeo. 

 

Nema nikakve veze nego cisto da pomenem i novi detalj u vezi Uvaldea posto se snimak pojavio. Sto se tice ubistva gde je lik pogodjen 46 puta radi se o klasicnom power trip-u koji je prisutan kod ne bas malog % policajaca. Posao se ne placa dobro, smene su katastrofa a nije da nema rizika, dakle takav posao je zanimljiv samo onima koji se na nesto tripuju, neko se tripuje da bude policajac a neko da muci druge, kazu da ne bas mali broj onih koji ne prodju vojni psiho test zavrsi u policiji i da obicno padnu jer su ocenjeni ko sociopate ili sadisti.

 

 

[Darko]

1 minute ago, MeanMachine said:

Nema nikakve veze nego cisto da pomenem i novi detalj u vezi Uvaldea posto se snimak pojavio.

Toliko o "good guy with a gun" glupostima.

 

2 minutes ago, MeanMachine said:

Sto se tice ubistva gde je lik pogodjen 46 puta radi se o klasicnom power trip-u koji je prisutan kod ne bas malog % policajaca. Posao se ne placa dobro, smene su katastrofa a nije da nema rizika, dakle takav posao je zanimljiv samo onima koji se na nesto tripuju, neko se tripuje da bude policajac a neko da muci druge, kazu da ne bas mali broj onih koji ne prodju vojni psiho test zavrsi u policiji i da obicno padnu jer su ocenjeni ko sociopate ili sadisti.

Ni ja drugo objašnjenje nemam, u glavi sam razmišljao o različitim scenarijama ali ništa nisam smislio što može da opravda to. Zanimljivo je kako do sada nisu bili gadni protesti, ovo je meni gore od George Floyd-a.

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

13 hours ago, Darko said:

Zanimljivo je kako do sada nisu bili gadni protesti

 

U Akronu su preko dana bili mirni protesti, uvece razbili nekoliko izloga, uhapsili 50tak osoba i sutradan dobili policijski cas. 

[deez nuts.]

 

sam krem trumptardizma

[Angelia]

2 hours ago, deez nuts. said:

 

sam krem trumptardizma

Jel znas ti koliko je kongresmena republikanaca?

Mislim da ne kontas da je ovo manje od 10% glasalo Ne...ako je to trampizam pa I nema ga mnogo 😊

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

Evo objasnjenja, sve jasno...

 

 

 

[bohumilo]

Sjajan tekst o post-modernom marksizmu i budnim zombijima, trnaskript govora koji je Beri Vajs održala studentima novoosnovanog Univerziteta u Ostinu:

 

https://www.commonsense.news/p/the-new-founders-america-needs

 

Svako će uraditi dobro ako pročita ceo tekst, a evo jednog sočnog odlomak (kroz koji se jasno čuje dobovanje čuvenih okeanijskih krilatica (koje su opisane već na samom početku knjige) iz Orvelove 1984., čiji zlokobni zadah je, od tog velikog teksta, nemoguće ne prepoznati u svim totalitarnim ideologijama):

 

 

...

The ideology that is trying to unseat liberalism in America begins by stipulating that the forces of justice and progress are in a war against backwardness and tyranny. And in a war, the normal rules of the game must be suspended. Indeed, this ideology would argue that those rules are not just obstacles to justice, but tools of oppression. They are the master’s tools. And the master’s tools cannot dismantle the master’s house.

 

So the tools themselves are not just replaced but repudiated. 

 

Persuasion—the purpose of argument—is replaced with public shaming. Moral complexity is replaced with moral certainty. Facts are replaced with feelings. The rule of law is replaced with mob rule.

 

Ideas are replaced with identity. Forgiveness is replaced with punishment. Debate is replaced with disinvitation and de-platforming. Diversity is replaced with homogeneity of thought. Inclusion with exclusion. Excellence with equity.

 

In this ideology, disagreement is recast as trauma. So speech is violence. But violence, when carried out by the right people in pursuit of a just cause, is not violence at all—but in fact justice.

 

In this ideology, bullying is wrong, unless you are bullying the right people, in which case it’s very, very good. In this ideology, information that does comport with The Narrative is recast as disinformation, its proponents as conspiracy theorists. In this ideology, education is not about teaching people how to think, it’s about re-educating them in what to think. In this ideology the need to feel safe trumps the need to speak truthfully. 

 

In this ideology, if you do not tweet the right tweet or share the right slogan, your whole life can be ruined. Just ask Tiffany Riley, a Vermont school principal who was fired—fired—because she said she supports black lives but not the organization Black Lives Matter.

 

In this ideology, the past cannot be understood on its own terms, but must be judged through the morals and mores of the present. It is why statues of Grant, Lincoln and Washington were torn down. It is why William Peris, a UCLA lecturer and an Air Force veteran, was investigated because he read Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” out loud in class. 

 

In this ideology, intentions don’t matter. That is why Emmanuel Cafferty, a Hispanic utility worker at San Diego Gas and Electric, was fired for making what someone said they thought was a white-supremacist hand gesture. In fact, he was fidgeting with his fingers out of his car window. 

 

In this ideology, you are guilty for the sins of your fathers. In other words: you are not you. You are only a mere avatar of your race or your religion or your class. That is why third graders in Cupertino, California, were asked to rate themselves in terms of their power and privilege. It is why an elementary school in Washington, D.C. gave kindergarteners a “fistbook” asking them to identify racist family members.

 

In this system, we are all placed neatly on a spectrum of “privileged” to “oppressed.” We are ranked somewhere on this spectrum in different categories: race, gender, sexual orientation and class. Then we are given an overall score, based on the sum of these rankings. Having privilege means that your character and your ideas are tainted. This is why, one high schooler in New York tells me, students in his school are told “if you are white and male, you are second in line to speak.” This is considered a normal and necessary redistribution of power.

 

Victimhood, in this ideology, confers morality. “I think therefore I am” is replaced with: “I am therefore I know.” Or: “I know therefore I am right.”

This ideology says there is no such thing as neutrality, not even in the law, which is why the very notion of colorblindness—the Kingian dream of judging people not based on the color of their skin but by the content of their character—must itself be deemed racist. 

 

In this ideology, the equality of opportunity is replaced with equality of outcome as a measure of fairness. Racism is no longer about individual discrimination. It is about systems that allow for disparate outcomes among racial groups. If everyone doesn’t finish the race at the same time, then the course must have been flawed and should be dismantled.

 

Thus the efforts to do away with the SAT, or the admissions test for elite public schools like Stuyvesant and Lowell—for decades, the engines of opportunity that allowed children of poor and working-class families to advance on their merit, regardless of race. Or the argument made by The New York Times’ classical music critic to do away with blind auditions for orchestras.

 

In fact, any feature of human existence that creates disparity of outcomes must be eradicated: The nuclear family, politeness, even rationality itself can be defined as inherently racist or evidence of white supremacy. The KIPP charter schools recently eliminated the phrase “work hard” from its famous motto “Work Hard. Be Nice.” Why? Because the idea of working hard “supports the illusion of meritocracy.” 

 

In this revolution, skeptics are recast as heretics. Those who do not abide by every single aspect of its creed are tarnished as bigots, subjected to boycotts and their work to political litmus tests. The enlightenment, as the critic Edward Rothstein has put it, has been replaced by the exorcism. 

What we call “cancel culture” is really the justice system of this revolution. And the goal of the cancellations is not merely to punish the person being canceled. The goal is to send a message to everyone else: Step out of line and you are next. 

 

It has worked.

 

A recent CATO study found that 62 percent of Americans are afraid to voice their true views. Nearly a quarter of American academics endorse ousting a colleague for having a wrong opinion about hot-button issues such as immigration. And nearly 70 percent of students favor reporting professors if the professor says something that students find offensive, according to a Challey Institute for Global Innovation survey. Think about that. A majority of students in America think it is a virtue to inform on their wrong-thinking professors. 

 

...

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kad sam već kod budnih zombija, pre neki dan sa uživanjem videh montipajnotovski primer religijskog nadbudnjavanja na internetu, pa neka i to bude zakačeno:

[Angelia]

@bohumilo Bari je fenomenalna novinarka, i text je odlican, samo je jedan deo zbunjujuc:

 

The answer is not liberalism, if liberalism means defending the Ministry of Truth as necessary to fight disinformation or protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices in the name of justice. Nor is it conservatism if conservatism means defending the rights of Big Tech to shut down the public square to conservatives, or fawning over European autocrats and theocracies and calling for a similar model of government to dawn on our shores. That’s why the founders left there for here.

 

Nit su to u opisu liberali, a ni konzervativci. To su extremisti koji su ukrali izraze, i to tako ide, prvo ti ukradu jezik. Pa se danas zezamo sa pricom  da ne mozemo da definisemo sta je zena. I imamo novogovor, ukljucujuci glupe pronounce. Orvelovski.

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

 

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/dhs-inspector-general-opens-criminal-probe-deleted-secret/story?id=87198495

 

Tajna sluzba pocistila tekstove (isto ono sto su pistali na Hilari) da ne bi bilo dokaza za 6 januar. Sada su pod krivicnom istragom. Ima li neko oko Trampa ko nije i nece zavrsiti u zatvoru, a on razmislja o kandidaturi, a njegovi glasaci se tome raduju. Poludela zemlja nacisto. 

[PorodicneVrijednosti]

57 minutes ago, Baby said:

 

 

Jedva cekam pamflete i logicke vratolomije da se i ovo kako pokusa opravdat i odbranit jer Reps good Dems bad 

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

25 minutes ago, alpaka Bereta Sida said:

 

Jedva cekam pamflete i logicke vratolomije da se i ovo kako pokusa opravdat i odbranit jer Reps good Dems bad 

 

Eh, cekace da se prevrne druga strana i ovo padne u zaborav da mogu da pisu kako je eto Bajden vakcinisan i dobio covid... ili neku slicnu glupost. 

 

Ako na ovim izborima sada budu preuzeli senat i house republikanci, tacno mozemo polako da podizemo spomenik americi... sa ovim idiotskim idejama koje uopste stizu na sto za glasanje. Kao, nema nista bitnije... 

[deez nuts.]

15 hours ago, Angelia said:

@bohumilo Bari je fenomenalna novinarka, i text je odlican, samo je jedan deo zbunjujuc:

 

The answer is not liberalism, if liberalism means defending the Ministry of Truth as necessary to fight disinformation or protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court Justices in the name of justice. Nor is it conservatism if conservatism means defending the rights of Big Tech to shut down the public square to conservatives, or fawning over European autocrats and theocracies and calling for a similar model of government to dawn on our shores. That’s why the founders left there for here.

 

Nit su to u opisu liberali, a ni konzervativci. To su extremisti koji su ukrali izraze, i to tako ide, prvo ti ukradu jezik. Pa se danas zezamo sa pricom  da ne mozemo da definisemo sta je zena. I imamo novogovor, ukljucujuci glupe pronounce. Orvelovski.

Kako ne mozes da definises sta je zena? U gornjepomenutom Commonsensu mozes procitati da je zenina svrha da radja decu, cisti kucu i da povremeno posluzi kao punching bag nervoznom muzu…kao sto su joj foundig fathers i namenili. 
 

Srednji vek. 

[Angelia]

5 hours ago, deez nuts. said:

Kako ne mozes da definises sta je zena? U gornjepomenutom Commonsensu mozes procitati da je zenina svrha da radja decu, cisti kucu i da povremeno posluzi kao punching bag nervoznom muzu…kao sto su joj foundig fathers i namenili. 
 

Srednji vek. 

Ako ne razumes pitanje, nemoj nuditi glup odgovor.

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

Quote

Steve Bannon, ex-White House strategist and adviser to former President Donald Trump, was found guilty by a jury Friday of criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to appear before the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.

Bannon was found guilty of two counts of criminal contempt — one for refusing to appear for a deposition before the panel and the other for refusing to produce requested documents. Each count carries a minimum potential sentence of 30 days and a maximum of one year in jail, as well as a fine of $100 to $1,000.

 

 

I on se zali sto oni nisu dosli da svedoce, a on je optuzen za isto. Lele kakav komad budale i dobro mu nisu dali nanogicu... 

 

[𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂]

Ovo je pre za neku drugu temu, ali...

 

 

Evo nove teme da se ljubitelji njegovih ideja nadogradjuju na ekologiju po Trampu. 

 

[Odjosh]

Uh, kakav tekst

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/firearms-industry-marketing-mass-shooter/670621/

 

The Gun Industry Created a New Consumer. Now It’s Killing Us.

 

Good marketing is supposed to generate demand. Bad firearms marketing has given us a national nightmare.

By Ryan Busse