Kronostime Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Ovo vise nista nema veze sa mozgom. (prvi post je nebitan, ne znam da razdvojim) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ćušpajz Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 super je sto gugl sve napiše pa ne moram da gledam video (: Candace Amber Owens Farmer is an American conservative commentator and political activist. She is known for her pro-Trump activism that began around 2016 after being initially very critical of Trump and the Republican Party, and her criticism of Black Lives Matter and of the Democratic Party. Wikipedia 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deez nuts. Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 hehe ko neki dan tvit nekog mrge se okaci, a on neki ultra desnicar pro trump pro nazi itd. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushman Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Baby said: Nece ovo stati skoro koliko se meni cini "You won’t burn our churches, loot our businesses, or destroy our homes." 🥺 Koji odgovor ovom treba da se da? Kakva stoka je ciljana grupa glasača ovoj spodobi? 🤪 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, uini said: super je sto gugl sve napiše pa ne moram da gledam video 🙂 Candace Amber Owens Farmer is an American conservative commentator and political activist. She is known for her pro-Trump activism that began around 2016 after being initially very critical of Trump and the Republican Party, and her criticism of Black Lives Matter and of the Democratic Party. Wikipedia Mozda ipak da odgledas video. Upravo ta retorika u kojoj neces da cujes sta neko ima da kaze na osnovu toga sta mislis da zastupa, je problem. U ovom slucaju ona se obraca AA zajednici, sa pozicije da je, pazi i ona AA. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ćušpajz Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, Angelia said: Mozda ipak da odgledas video. Upravo ta retorika u kojoj neces da cujes sta neko ima da kaze na osnovu toga sta mislis da zastupa, je problem. U ovom slucaju ona se obraca AA zajednici, sa pozicije da je, pazi i ona AA. nije nikakav problem, dovoljno sam pročitao In May 2018, Owens suggested that "something bio-chemically happens" to women who do not marry or have children, and she linked to the Twitter handles of Sarah Silverman, Chelsea Handler, and Kathy Griffin, saying that they were "evidentiary support" of this theory.[32][33] Silverman responded: "It seems to me that by tweeting this, you would like to maybe make us feel badly. I'd say this is evidenced by ur effort to use our twitter handles so we would see. My heart breaks for you, Candy. I hope you find happiness in whatever form that takes."[32] Owens responded, accusing Silverman of supporting terrorists and crime gangs.[32] Dispute with Mollie Tibbetts' familyEdit In August 2018, Owens had a dispute with a cousin of Mollie Tibbetts. Tibbetts was murdered, allegedly by Cristhian Bahena Rivera, a 24 year old Mexican undocumented immigrant.[76] Tibbetts' cousin said that Owens had exploited Tibbetts' death for "political propaganda".[77][78] Owens responded, describing the cousin's criticism as a "strange" attack on Trump supporters.[79] Later that month the University of Iowa chapter of Turning Point USA criticized Owens for "public harassment" towards a member of Tibbetts' family.[79] October 2018 mail bombing attemptsEdit Learn more This section possibly contains original research. In October 2018, during the mail bombing attempts targeting prominent Democrats, Owens promoted the conspiracy theory that the bomb mailings were sent by leftists.[80] After authorities on October 26 arrested a 56-year-old suspect who was a registered Republican and Trump supporter, Owens deleted her comments on Twitter without explanation.[81] Comments about HitlerEdit At the launch of the British offshoot Turning Point UK in December 2018, in response to an audience member who asked for a "long-term prognosis" about the terms "globalism" and "nationalism", Owens said: I actually don't have any problems at all with the word "nationalism". I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. Globalism is what I don't want. Whenever we say "nationalism" the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler. You know, [Hitler] was a national socialist, but if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted—he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German. Everybody to look a different way. That's not, to me, that's not nationalism.[82] Following heavy criticism for her comments, Owens clarified them on Twitter and in a Judiciary Committee hearing in the US House of Representatives in February 2019.[83] Owens said that "[Hitler] was a homicidal, psychopathic, maniac that killed his own people" and "[Hitler was not a Nationalist, he] murdered his own people, a nationalist would not kill their own people". That the point of her comments was to say that there is "no excuse or defense ever for... everything that [Hitler] did".[84] She also said that her comments were about Hitler's crimes against Jews.[83] Owens' comments about Hitler were played in April 2019 by Representative Ted Lieu during testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee about the issue of increasing hate crimes and white supremacy in America. Lieu said that he did not know Owens and was just going to let her own words characterize her, before playing the audio clip. Owens responded that Lieu had deliberately omitted an interviewer's question that provided critical context to her words, with the intent of misrepresenting them as an endorsement of Hitler, to smear her reputation.[85] Donald Trump's son Donald Trump Jr. praised Owens on Twitter for "call(ing) out the Dems on their purposeful manipulation of facts for their narrative".[86] Mention in Christchurch shooter's "manifesto"Edit The terrorist who committed the Christchurch mosque shootings produced a "manifesto" in which he wrote that Owens had "influenced him above all".[87][88][89] According to journalist Robert Evans, it was "possible, even likely" that the shooter was a fan of Owens, considering her rhetoric against Muslim immigrants, but in context the terrorist's references to her may have been an example of "shitposting" intended to provoke political conflict.[90][91] Hours after the shootings, Owens posted a tweet in reaction to allegations that she inspired the mass murder, saying that she never created any content espousing her views on the 2nd Amendment (to the United States Constitution) or Islam.[92] Her tweet was criticized[by whom?] for appearing glib, and it was reported that she actually had posted tweets about the 2nd Amendment and Islam.[93][94][95][72] She later made formal statements rejecting any connection to the shooter.[72] Coronavirus pandemicEdit Learn more This section possibly contains original research. During the coronavirus pandemic, Owens frequently downplayed the seriousness of the pandemic. In February 2020, after the first Americans died in the coronavirus pandemic, she sarcastically tweeted "Now we’re all going to die from Coronavirus."[96] In late March she argued that the United States was suffering from a "doomsday cult" of liberal paranoia.[96] 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 17 minutes ago, Bushman said: Kakva stoka je ciljana grupa glasača ovoj spodobi? 🤪 Ista kao i predsednikova. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Ovih videa na sve strane, i dobrog i loseg ima toliko da ne znam sta odabrati. Od policije koja peva, kleci i djuska sa demonstrantima, do policije koja razbija medicinskim sestrama satore i gura starce sa stapovima, tuce i baca suzavce na mirne demonstrante. Isto tako ima demonstranata koji u velikom broju hodaju mirno i govore, a ima divljaka koji ruse, pale, lome i kradu sve pred sobom. Sve u svemu, ova vlast je totalno nesposobna za sve (i duboko korumpirana, dublje nego bilo koja prethodna. Nikada ni jedna clan nije otvorio usta da kaze nesto protiv careve odluke, sektasi), a "najbolje" se pokazala u kriznim situacijama kao sto je virus i kao sto su demonstracije. Predsednik je cutao pet dana da bi na kraju tukao sve mirne po ulici da se slika sa bilblijom (on, sa svih 7 smrtnih grehova, kakva ironija), i preti vojskom tj. civilnim ratom. Ustvari, kao da je cekao ovakvu priliku da pokaze koliki je kada ga stite americka vojska, policija i nacionalna garda (i posalje poruku glasacima da mogu imaju zastitu), plus glavni baja u sudu koji zapisava tamo gde ovaj kaze. Posle neka mi neko kaze da nije bitno kakva je osoba dosla na vlast. Njegovo je bilo da prvi dan izadje i smiri strasti, obeca pravdu i potrudi se da je dobiju, a ne da se zalaze da se pravno progleda kroz prste njegovom rasistickom mentoru Rodzeru Stonu i instutuiranje laganja kongresu kao legitimnu pojavu. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayupFromTheMidget Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Ta korona je bila glavna tema i protesti za otvaranje drzave. A sada kada protestvuju ti koji su najvise kukali protiv otvaranja drzave, niko vise ne spominje koronu i povecani protok iste zbog protesta. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ćušpajz Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 7 minutes ago, LayupFromTheMidget said: Ta korona je bila glavna tema i protesti za otvaranje drzave. A sada kada protestvuju ti koji su najvise kukali protiv otvaranja drzave, niko vise ne spominje koronu i povecani protok iste zbog protesta. možda postoji ta mala razlika u protestu zbog prava da odeš kod frizera i hladnokrvnog ubistva koje se dešava po viđenom paternu al to si cenim, znao i bez mene 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 5 minutes ago, LayupFromTheMidget said: Ta korona je bila glavna tema i protesti za otvaranje drzave. A sada kada protestvuju ti koji su najvise kukali protiv otvaranja drzave, niko vise ne spominje koronu i povecani protok iste zbog protesta. Tacno, s tim sto je drzava bila tada zatvorena zbog toga sto se nije znalo u kom pravcu ide, pa kada su videli da ne ide dobro su je ipak otvorili ili bar delom, kako gde. Znaci, nisu ista pravila vazila tada i sada. Drugo, oni pre su duvali ljudima u lice bez maski namerno, ovi vecinom imaju maske. Moze da da se koristi kao spin protiv demonstranata, ako nista drugo ne preostane. Sada ce biti verovatno katastrofa od virusa, po mojoj slobodnoj proceni. I da se vratim na moj prethodni post. Predsednik US "Kostunica" kasni sa zatvaranjem jer ignorise i dobijamo virusni rezultat takav kakav je, pa zatim kasni sa odgovorom da smiri masu, nego napaljuje policiju, gardu i vojsku na njih i preti. Totalni fail iz vrha u oba slucaja. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayupFromTheMidget Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, uini said: možda postoji ta mala razlika u protestu zbog prava da odeš kod frizera i hladnokrvnog ubistva koje se dešava po viđenom paternu al to si cenim, znao i bez mene A cenim da znas da koronu boli kurac zbog cega si izasao da protestvujes u masi bez socijalnog distanciranja. Ili korona zna za humanost pa ce da bude blaza sada kada je motivacija krsenje ljudskih prava a ne propadanje ekonomije? Ili ceo taj narativ smrtonosna korona ubija ljudi sada ne ide uz pozeljan narativ pa je ne spominju? I dalje im umiru po 1000 svakog dana, videcemo za 2 nedelje koliki ce porast da bude. 2 vesti su im bile viralne neka Trampovka je pozelela da korona prosiri na protestu 2) neki koledz fudbaler je dobio istu na protestu.https://www.wjtv.com/health/coronavirus/madison-county-prosecutor-we-can-only-hope-the-deadly-coronavirus-strain-spreads-in-riots/https://edition.cnn.com/webview/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-06-03-20-intl/h_d65bff4867359b5aa13bb186d71b0718 Edited June 4, 2020 by LayupFromTheMidget 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wwww Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 22 minutes ago, LayupFromTheMidget said: Ta korona je bila glavna tema i protesti za otvaranje drzave. A sada kada protestvuju ti koji su najvise kukali protiv otvaranja drzave, niko vise ne spominje koronu i povecani protok iste zbog protesta. Zat ti nisi cuo da je corona pobedjena (miraculously disappeared, kako je preCednik i obecao)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ćušpajz Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 ne znam šta da ti kažem. ljudi su očigledno popizdeli, nije ovo racionalan protest u smislu toga da je metodican i nešto politički organizovan ljudima je to big deal tamo, mi možda ne možemo dovoljno da se relateujemo @LayupFromTheMidget .. u srbiji da se ovako nešto desilo sa sve viral elementom, ljudi bi izašli na ulice i to računam kao "jednokratni" incident a ne kao kontinuirani problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 51 minutes ago, LayupFromTheMidget said: Ta korona je bila glavna tema i protesti za otvaranje drzave. A sada kada protestvuju ti koji su najvise kukali protiv otvaranja drzave, niko vise ne spominje koronu i povecani protok iste zbog protesta. Ne, oni se zale da uhapseni koji su pljackali i lomili nemaju dovoljno socijalne distance u pritvoru.... Policijski cas ovde nije uvodjen da bi se nekome ogranicilo pravo da protestuje nego da bi se iskontrolisalo lomljenje, paljenje i kradja, koja se najbolje sprovodi pod okriljem noci kada je teze za policiju da adekvatno reaguje. Za ocekivati je bilo da je zaustavljanje nasilja u interesu svih dobronamernih ljudi, i da protest definitivno ne zeli da izgleda da podrzavaju takvo ponasanje. Medjutim iznenadjujuce oni ipak odlucuju da protestuju u vreme policijskog casa, i da daju pokrice nasilju. Iako ne znam sto me bilo sta iznenadjuje, kada se ovde US uporedjuje sa nacistickom Nemackom, a pokusaji da policija zaustavi pljacku i povredjivanje ljudi, poredi sa Tjenanmenom. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayupFromTheMidget Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 50 minutes ago, uini said: ne znam šta da ti kažem. ljudi su očigledno popizdeli, nije ovo racionalan protest u smislu toga da je metodican i nešto politički organizovan ljudima je to big deal tamo, mi možda ne možemo dovoljno da se relateujemo @LayupFromTheMidget Ma kapiram sta hoces da kazes. Nego je Baby spomenula koronu pa me bas podsetila na promenu u izvestavanju oko iste u roku od par dana. Gde se kukalo kako Tramp hoce da pobije sve zbog otvaranja ekonomije a sada se skoro i ne spominje a imas hiljade na ulici ako ne milione. A nije im kriva pri kraju kao sto je u Evropi pa da to bude razlog, imaju po ~1000 svakog dana. Ali evo bas danas su poceli da "upozoravaju" zvanicnici:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cuomo-says-george-floyd-protesters-should-assume-they-have-been-infected-with-coronavirushttps://www.newsweek.com/texas-arizona-oregon-report-significant-coronavirus-spikes-after-reopening-economy-1508683https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/03/california-covid-19-cases-rise-reopen-protest Imaces proteste kod nas do kraja godine posle izbora moja procena, ali sumnjam da ce bilo kod da pali i pljacka radnje osim kada su vracali Kosovo pre 12 godina. Ovo sto sada rade nema smisla ni iz ugla revolucije Trocki(DOS kod nas 2000) nije palio kafane i prodavnice vec zauzeo strateski bitne lokacije, sumnjam da je prodavnica Apple toliko strateski bitna kao i Macy. Morace sto pre da dobro definisu prohteve, mislim vec su trebali da imaju jasne ciljeve nisu oni mlada organizacija tu su jos od perioda Obame vec su trebali da kazu tacne ciljeve i prohteve. Inace ce da nestane sto pre ova energija kako to obicno ide sa protestima mislim nije ovo 1 protiv Trampa protiv njega su poceli i pre nego sto je seo na Obaminu stolicu. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ćušpajz Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 šta ti sve poredis proteste kod nas, kovid, kosovo uz obavezno pljačke radnji, mislim da si neki rekord postavio na temu neozbiljan si ticma, džaba trošimo vreme jedan drugom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 23 minutes ago, LayupFromTheMidget said: Morace sto pre da dobro definisu prohteve, mislim vec su trebali da imaju jasne ciljeve nisu oni mlada organizacija tu su jos od perioda Obame vec su trebali da kazu tacne ciljeve i prohteve. Pa rekli su, smanjenje policijske brutalnosti i jednakost pred zakonom, a ovi hoce da zaustave demonstracije sa policijskom brutalnoscu. Mislim... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayupFromTheMidget Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 (edited) 23 minutes ago, uini said: šta ti sve poredis proteste kod nas, kovid, kosovo uz obavezno pljačke radnji, mislim da si neki rekord postavio na temu neozbiljan si ticma, džaba trošimo vreme jedan drugom Jedino sto sam ja poredio su izvestaji medija o KORONI pre i posle pocetka protesta i promenu po tom pitanju. Srbiju si pazi cuda ti prvi spomenuo ja sam se samo nadovezao na to, rekao kada su kod nas debili bez ikakvog razloga palili neduzne radnje "zbog viseg cilja" pardon licne koristi sto se desava sada svako vece u Merici. Ali da ako ti ne smeta paljenje radnje onda gubimo vreme to je sigurno. Kao sto smo gubili vreme na diskusiju humora i cenzure na proslom forumu, razliciti stavovi. @Baby pa danas su promeni stepen ubistva i optuzili druge policajce koji nisu pomogli Floydu . Derek Chauvin, who pressed his knee into Floyd's neck for nearly nine minutes, was previously charged with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. The new second-degree murder charge says he killed Floyd "without intent" in the course of committing assault in the third degree, according to an amended complain. Derek Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane and Tou Thao face charges in the death of George Floyd. Thomas Lane and J. Alexander Kueng, who helped restrain Floyd, and Tou Thao, who stood near the others, were not initially charged. Lane, 37, Kueng, 26, and Thao, 34, are now charged with aiding and abetting second-degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter. Edited June 4, 2020 by LayupFromTheMidget Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ćušpajz Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 gubimo vreme zato što će ljudi koji kradu ili pale biti krivično gonjeni a kod tebe je danima to glavna tema, ispade da je ubistvo no biggie samo cepaj, ja nemam nameru da komuniciram sa individuama koje će da mi poturaju pljačku, neke usa miše vacice i priču da država treba preko suda to polako a ne ovo nasta liči biram da ne razgovaram sa ljudima koji mi racionalizuju vučića, trampa i ostale govnarije ja sam zalutao ovde, my bad 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 23 minutes ago, LayupFromTheMidget said: @Baby pa danas su promeni stepen ubistva i optuzili druge policajce koji nisu pomogli Floydu . To je trebalo odmah da urade kod prve demonstracije, a ne da ih gadjaju suzavcima. Tada jos nista nisu razbijali. Evo danas republikanac Paul se bori za pravo policajaca da mogu da lincuju i nanose manje povrede, naravno, nisu se dogovorili. Quote The Senate could easily approve the House’s bill to make lynching a federal crime and send it to President Donald Trump for his signature. But the Kentucky Republican is demanding changes that he says are needed to ensure lynching charges can’t be brought for minor injuries. And though the Senate could hold a roll call vote on the House’s anti-lynching bill and end the impasse, GOP leaders currently have no plans to devote floor time to the bill. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/04/rand-paul-anti-lynching-bill-301617 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayupFromTheMidget Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Gde ja racionalizujem Vucica, Trampa i ostale govnjare?Ili poturam americke mise vacice? Molim citate. A kako drzava da resi osim preko suda? Koje to novo otkrice imas ? Metak u celo da dobiju rasisticki policajci?Revolucija ? Da raspuste policiju ?Anarhija? Sta ima moderna drzava osim nezavisnog sudstva i vladavine prava? Osim Floyda koji je nastradao zbog neizivljenog debila koji ce da zavrsi u zatvoru, zao mi je sitnih preduzetnika koji ako nisu osigurani izgubili su sve. Zao mi je onog crnog ex pandura kog sam spomenuo koji je otisao da vidi prodavnicu drugara pa su ga roknuli, da li ce njegove ubice da zavrse u zatvor? Da li ljudima puca kurac sto je on nastradao posto ga nije ubio policajac vec masa koja koristi smrt da pljacka? A posto smo pre 2 posta vec presli na ad homineme(neozbiljnost, prebacivanje za pljacku i ovo misa vacic) ja biram da ne razgovaram sa skrivenim komunistima kojima malo po malo izadje autoritarna crta licnosti. Kao ovaj poslednji post gde ti je toliko zao da ne vlada jednoumlje po svakom mogucem pitanju, pa si satro zalutao. A cinjenica je da se velika vecina ovde slaze sa tobom po pitanju Floyda ako ne i svi. Jedino gde se ne slazu svi sa tobom je oko Trampa jbg ima ovde par Trampovaca koji misle da je on najbolji izbor za predsednika. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bohumilo Posted June 5, 2020 Share Posted June 5, 2020 4 hours ago, Angelia said: U ovom slucaju ona se obraca AA zajednici, sa pozicije da je, pazi i ona AA. Upravo su crni intelektualci poput Waltera Williamsa ili Thomasa Sowella (bez dileme jednog od najvecih zapadnih intelektualaca druge polovine XX veka) najozbiljnije i najkvalitetnije analizirali probleme AA populacije u SAD - uzmite bilo koju Sowellovu knjigu (osim onih koje su strogo ekonomske*), ili cak odgledajte bilo koji njegov intervju na YT, i dublje cete razumeti uzroke crnackih problema u SAD nego da citav zivot sedite ispred TV-a ili Tvitera. Njihovi data-driven radovi ukazuju npr. na pogubnost "gangsterske kulture" (koju Sowell trasira unazad do juznjacke krekerske/keltske/prianglikanse kulture iz antebelum perioda) i ostalih negativnih osobina koje figurisu u crnackoj kulturi (dobrim delom zahvaljujuci njihovoj viktimizaciji (i njome indukovanoj samoviktimizaciji) od strane belih liberala), na katastrofalne posledice "rata protiv droga", zatim welfare stejta koji je, kako ubedljivo dokumentuje, kljucni uzrocnik strahovitog broja samohranih majki, a odrastanje bez oca (narocito u stambenim jedinicama "public housinga", u drustvu sa gomilom druge dece bez oceva) je jedan od apsolutno najboljih prediktora neuspeha u zivotu (welfare stejt je, kako Sovel upecatljivo primecuje, iskasapio crnacku porodicu onako kako godine robovlasnistva nisu uspele), zakona o minimalcu koji onemogucuje crnim tinejdzerima da nadju legalan posao i pristupe trzistu radu (ostavljajuci im opciju da ceo zivot budu na socijali ili da postanu kriminalci) itd, isl***...no, oni nisu interesantni iz medijske (tj. Dvorske) perspektive posto nisu upotrebljivi za "humanitarce" koji muzu crnacke glasove u zamenu za socijalnu pomoc... btw, Candice je ziva vatra, gledam ponekad njen podcast na PragerU kanalu. U klipu je pomenula tezu Selbija Stila o tome kako je crnacka kultura jedina koja glorifikuje najprblematicnije ljude iz svoje zajednice, nisam siguran koliko je to tacno, mislim da zavisi od toga koliko je kultura kolektivisticka (a pokusacu da pronadjem u kom kontekstu to Stil kaze posto ga nikad nisam citao), ali me je podsetilo na jednu Sovelovu tezu da je demokratski establisment pre svega zainteresovan za pomaganje i pospesivanje najgorih aspekata crnacke kulture, kako kaze "uvek pomazu crncima koji rade nesto lose": * naravno uzmite i njih, ali u drugom kontekstu, jer su to neke od najboljih knjiga iz ekonomije ikada napisanih (npr Knowledge and Decision ili Basic Economics) *** treba razumeti da ni jedan od ovih socijalnih ishoda koje vezujemo za AA zajednice, kao sto je velika stopa nezaposlenosti, velika stopa vanbracne dece (do 70%), velika stopa kriminaliteta itd NISU istorijska konstanta od gradjanskog rata naovamo, vec na scenu stupaju otprilike 60ih godina proslog veka (otprilike kad su "progresivni" poceli da im pomazu), a da su pre toga crnci bili po njima (parametrima) bara-bar sa belcima, u nekim oblastima cak i bolji (crnci su u prvoj polovini 20og veka imali manju nezaposlenost od belaca itd)... 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now