wwww

jos jedna novina od ove godine: dobijaju se bonus pare za one koji su najbolje prosli na 500 turnirima

Karlosu trenutno predstavljaju problem igraci koji igraju brzo i snazno i blizu linija, koji ne cekaju u defanzivi, igraju brzo, ne daju mu vremena, pozuruju ga, a to je igra za indoors. Naravno, Medvedev je posebna prica, ali on je i generalno posena prica. No, Karlos je na travi pokazao da je sposoban vrlo brzo da uci, videcemo da li ce biti vremena za tako nesto ove indoor sezone. Mene zanima sta ce Medvedev da uradi do kraja sezone. Igra sledece sedmice Bec, kao i Siner (bar se jos nije povukao).

Karlos uopste ne mora da zapinje sad na kraju sezone i da eventualno dobije neke ozbiljnije povrede koje ce mu uticati na nastavak karijere. Tek je poceo, mlad je. Mora da nauci da racionalno i ekonomicno rasipa energiju, a ne da juri za svakom lopticom, pa i onom nemogucom za stici. Da nauci od Novaka kako to da radi. Jeste da me je Novak ponekad nervirao kad krene onako u 2. brzini, pa mrljavi i otaljava tamo neke meceve u prvim rundama, umesto da malo stisne gas i bez sokova za publiku resi mec, ali bice da Novak ipak bolje zna od mene sta i kako treba raditi. Tj. kako naci neki optimalan balas potrosnje energije (mentalne i fizicke, ma hajde da dodam i emocionalne, mada mi ide na zivce recitovanje ovog "svetog trojstva" po automatizmu).

Karlos otkazao Bazel, sto ima ove posledice sto se tice Novakovog #1 i YE#1 renkinga: od ranije mu je osigurano 397 sedmica na #1 (tek u ponedeljak posle Pariza bi to eventualno moglo da se promeni). da bi ga Karlos posle Pariza, a pre Torina pretekao na #1 (i sprecio Novaka da dogura do 399 sedmica) potrebno je da osvoji 501 bod vise od Novaka u Parizu. Sto znaci: - Karlos mora da osvoji Pariz, a Novak da ne dodje do finala - Karlos gubi finale, ali Novak gubi ili prvi ili drugi mec u Parizu. dalje, naravno, sve zavisi od toga sta urade u Torinu.

elem, i mene je ovo neracunanje nekih mastersa kod nekih tenisera zbunilo pre nekoliko meseci (neki teniseri dobiju pravo da zamene los rezultat na mastersu, a neki ne), pa sam pitala pametnije od sebe, koji su mi objasnili par detalja oko ove zavrzlame 😁

pa jeste se desila katastrofa, evo pricamo na Politici o tome.

👋

Shangaj je obavezni masters, zato je morao da zameni najslabiji od "drugih" rezulttata. Ove godine je uvedeno novo pravilo da se los rezultat na nekom mastersu moze zameniti nekim boljim rezultatom s slabijeg turnira, ali ako i samo ako je taj slabiji turnir odigran POSLE doticnog mastersa. Dakle, nema ono: vec ima neki mali turnir s solidnim rezultatom, pa ako na trenutno igrajucem mastersu proce lose uzece mu se vec postojeci dobaar rezultat s malog turnira. Ovo je malo komplikovano za shvatiti (bas su se "potrudili" i napravili totalnu zavrzlamu za pracenje listi). Pretpostavljam da im je bila ideja da kao podstaknu da se igraju ti manji turniri u drugom delu sezone. Npr. ako Fric sad napavi lep rezultat u Tokiju moci ce da sutne rezultat iz Shangaja i racuna Tokio iako mu je kvota za male turnire u ovoj godini ispunjena. Ima sijaset ovakvih slucajeva za manje-vise sve igrace. Npr. Rubljovu je Peking sad zamenio rezultat iz Kanade (10=>45) Zverevu je Peking izbacio rezultat iz Kanade (45=> 180), a Bastad je zamenio Majami (10=>45) max. mogu 3 ovakve zamene da se dese u sezoni.

trebalo bi da su i za zene i za muskarce i isto doba vazila ista pravila sto se tice nosilaca. u tom smislu bi samo poredjenje ATP i WTA u odredjenom intervalu koji je gore analiziran trebalo da bude ok. negde sam videla i neku analizu koliko je razlicitih SF, finalista i pobednika bilo kod zena i kod muskaraca u poslednjih xy GS-ova/godina. kad nadjem postavicu. a videla sam negde i neku analizu soliko je bilo Top10 meceva na WTA turu i na ATP turu ove godine/prosle godine/i mozda i prethodne. u principu: mnogo manje kod zena, sto samo potvrdjuje totalnu nekonstantnost WTA poslednjih godina, za razliku od ATP.

🚴‍♂️Thibaut Pinot i Guillaume Martin - velike SrBende. sta sve nece covek procitati na ovom forumu...

I mean, ATP's DEPTH!!! in late 1990s/early 2000s must have been almost as impressive as WTA's one now.

https://www.eltiempo.com/deportes/tenis/rafael-nadal-infiltraciones-y-dopaje-ciclistas-abren-el-debate-678291 Nadal: “I can't continue competing with my foot asleep, we have to find a solution. I would love to continue racing, so next week I am going to talk to several doctors and look at various options. I will receive a treatment and I hope it will help me, ”he indicated. Well, those statements did not go down well in cycling and several well-known cyclists on the planet have spoken on the subject, because they do not agree with that. Against the wall In cycling, for a long time, the topic of infiltrations has been prohibited, they cannot be carried out, so the Nadal topic did not have a good reaction. “Heroes of today…” wrote Thibaut Pinot, after playing the subject. Nadal said in Paris he couldn't answer how many times he had infiltrated. "It's better that you don't know," Nadal replied to the question. Another recognized cyclist, the French, Guillaume Martin, also referred to the subject. "What Nadal did would have been impossible on the bike, and I think that's normal," he told L'Equipe. And he added: "If you're sick or injured, you don't run, you don't compete (...) They go through heroes, but they are 'substances' to help the pain go away." Martin is one of those who have attacked doping in sport, thanks to the philosophy that is formed in cycling of zero tolerance. In the world of medicine, they do not look favorably on the use of infiltrations for athletes. “You have to know what they infiltrate it with. And the issue is that in cycling that is prohibited, ”Fredy Avella, a doctor, told EL TIEMPO. “In sports there are therapeutic use authorizations. It is clear that it is an advantage for him over the rival because it helps to avoid pain, "said the doctor.

“Today’s heroes…”: Thibaut Pinot and Guillaume Martin question Rafael Nadal’s use of anaesthetic injections during French Open “To say that the limit is between what is prohibited and authorised, that does not seem to me the right criterion." https://road.cc/content/news/pinot-and-martin-question-nadal-injections-293447 “Today’s heroes…”: Thibaut Pinot and Guillaume Martin question Rafael Nadal’s use of anaesthetic injections during French Open “We see too many athletes using this kind of practice in recent weeks,” said the Groupama-FDJ rider “When you have an injection or you use cortisone, there are at least three weeks of effects. Some do [it] just before the races. You are out of competition, but the effect is there,” he told L’Équipe at the time(link is external). “I'm the complete opposite of all of that, but we're still in two-speed cycling I think. “A guy who has a TUE has no place being on a bicycle. He is not fit to compete." “If a cyclist does the same thing, it’s already forbidden,” Cofidis rider Martin said. “But even if it weren’t, everyone would call him doped because there is such a cultural background, such connotations attached to the bike. “While people praise Nadal for being able to go this far in pain. I believe that [AC Milan forward] Zlatan Ibrahimovic also spoke about his knee injections. “They pass for heroes because they go far in pain, but in fact, they use substances to go far in pain and again, it’s very borderline. “The winner on the bike, in particular that of the Tour de France, even if there is no element behind it, he is systematically accused of doping.” “The UCI anti-doping regulations, for me are a minimum. There are plenty of things that are allowed and that I forbid myself. It’s the whole question of grey areas, the use of certain drugs that are normally used to treat cancers, multiple sclerosis for example. “I don’t see myself taking this kind of thing to be a better cyclist. Yet it is allowed. The anti-doping agencies are always behind the times, so I don’t think you have to wait for them to position themselves to adopt their own positions. “It is up to everyone to build their own ethics. I accept that sometimes my results are less good because I follow this ethic, but nevertheless I remain consistent with myself and I am satisfied with that.”

mislim da je on jos pre vise od deceniju totalno rascistio s sobom da ne bi da upotrebljava "injekciju" (shvatiti ovo kao opstu metaforu) da bi postigao odredjene sportske rezultate. Kao sto rece ovaj biciklista u clanku L'equipea. Umesto ubacivanja u telo svakojakih "supstanci" koje bi mu pomogle da postigne bolji performans, odlucio je da "izbaci" iz tela sve ono sto ometa njegovo telo da pruzi maksimum (ono cime se telo "zamajava" umesto da trosi elergiju na sportski performans), plus i da da svom telu najbolji moguci "input". Dalje poboljsanje performasi je islo preko mentalnih vezbi (posto je opste poznato da ljudi mogu da izdrze vece napore i postignu bolje rezultate ako su u posebnom mentalnom stanju).