Angelia

To ti je bio odgovor na nijedno masovno pucanje nije od ilegalnog oruzja.

The first Covid lockdowns saved 10,000 lives in Europe and US had 'little or no effect' on the virus death rate, updated analysis suggests. A review by an international team of economists found draconian shutdowns only reduced Covid mortality by 3 per cent in the UK, US and Europe in 2020. The experts, from Johns Hopkins University in the US, Lund University in Sweden and the Danish think-tank the Center for Political Studies, said that equates to 6,000 fewer deaths in Europe and 4,000 fewer in the US. This figures is a revised from the group's first report last year, which found lockdowns cut Covid deaths by just 0.2 per cent. The team said the updated figure is down to changes in their calculations and new studies. But they still conclude: 'Stricter lockdowns are not an effective way of reducing mortality rates during a pandemic, at least not during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.' .... Their report does not look at the effect of lockdowns excess deaths, which includes people who died from other causes because hospitals were shut, for example. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10856933/Lockdowns-saved-just-10k-lives-Europe-combined-Study-finds-little-no-effect.html isti medij: Thousands more Americans may be living with undiagnosed HIV than before Covid struck, official figures have suggested, in a warning sign the devastating virus is spreading again in the United States. The annual surveillance report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports new diagnoses fell by about two percent every year since 2016. But in 2020, the latest available data, they tumbled 17 percent to 30,000 new cases — which was 5,000 fewer than would be expected based on previous trends. At the same time the number of CDC-funded swabs for the virus fell by half from 2.4 to 1.2 million, one of the lowest numbers on record, leading officials to fear many cases have gone unnoticed. In its report the agency said the 'steep reduction' in new cases was 'likely due to disruptions in clinical care, patient hesitancy... and shortages in HIV testing reagents/materials'. Bruce Packett, director of American Academy of HIV medicine, told DailyMail.com it was 'very likely' thousands of cases had been missed. He warned that — in line with other sexually transmitted diseases — cases of HIV may now be 'level' or 'even increasing', in a reversal of the gradual decline since for the past four years. The CDC warns other STIs like gonorrhea and syphilis may already be at record highs. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10854241/Thousands-Americans-living-diagnosed-HIV-report-shows.html U principu unistili smo ekonomiju, deca su zaostala u razvoju, da bi spasili 7k ljudi koliko ce otprilike dobiti HIV

Notably, most individuals who engaged in mass shootings used handguns (77.2%), and 25.1% used assault rifles in the commission of their crimes. Of the known mass shooting cases (32.5% of cases could not be confirmed), 77% of those who engaged in mass shootings purchased at least some of their guns legally, while illegal purchases were made by 13% of those committing mass shootings. In cases involving K-12 school shootings, over 80% of individuals who engaged in shootings stole guns from family members. ..... Most individuals who perpetrated mass shootings had a prior criminal record (64.5%) and a history of violence (62.8%) https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/public-mass-shootings-database-amasses-details-half-century-us-mass-shootings drugi bold je typo jer treba da bude 23% Edit: Najveci broj masobnih ubistava su porodicni sukobi

Najveci broj ljudi je tu umrlo od ilegalnog oruzja. Ovakvi slucajevi bi se smanjili sa background checkom, i prijavljivanjem skola, ali to nema ko da plati. Naravno da ima para za Ukrajinu jer je to virtue signaling, za ovo nema para jer nije popularno. O ovom pucanju ce se pricati nedelju-dve da bi se dobili politicki poeni i onda ce sve otici nazad na isto. Niko nece da izgubi izbore zbog toga.

Zelja da se privatni gradjani zastite od drzave se nije promenila, to smo recimo videli u Waco, TX a pogotovo tokom nereda zadnjih dve godine. Uz to i zadnjih par meseci oko pljacki ... Pistolj ne moze da prodje Sc pod drugim amandmanom. Svi znaju sta se mislilo sa "keep and bear arms" isto kao sto se pominje militia. Kosta, zato ceka, niko nece da ga finansira. Nista stvarno, samo sto nema para da se izglasa. Znaci podrzavam stav, samo nema ko da ga plati. Veoma normalno u velikim gradovima zadnje dve godine, posledica BLM nereda i defund police politike, gde se i uhapseni kriminalci pustaju nazad na ulicu u roku od 24h. To nikakve veze nema sa dostupnoscu oruzja. To oruzje je najcesce kupljeno ilegalno. Najvise ljudi pogine u takvim pucnjavama, a ne u skolama.

Izaberi ko glasa za ono sto je tebi bitno, bez obzira da li je za Tramp ili ne. Glasaj za ono sto ti je bitno. Ako je to kontrola oruzja, glasaj ko to podrzava.

Glasaj za druge debile. Nije da ja podrzavam samo jedne, nego ti to radis. Glasaj za nekog ko podrzava tvoj stav. Ostavi se mog izbora

Niko ti za sada nije trazio da ga platis. Da su ti trazili osetila bi. Nego si ti samo pomesala objasnjenje da ne postoji centralni sistem koji bi mogao da odradi background check pravilno sa placanjem privatnog lica za background check. Pa mi kazes kad mogu da kupe oruzje mogu da plate I za background check...pa ne kupuju ljudi naoruzanje za Ukrajinu. Posto to nije moguce jer ne postoji koncenzus, moglo bi da skole prijave takve slucajeve, pa da postoji neki mental care. Medjutim, u mnogim skolskim okruzima, pare se stavljaju na CRT I gender identity, to mogu da rade, da ubedjuju decu da su gender fluid I dovode do svakakvih mentalnih problema a ovo ne mogu. Oruzje moze svuda da se kupi, deca od 14 ili 16 ga upotrebljavaju po Chicagu, NYC, baltimoru...a nisu ga nabavili legalno. Umesto sto se uporno napada 2gi amandman, jel moze nesto realisticno da se uradi? Valjda je neko nesto naucio jos od Columbine

Takav sistem kosta bilione, a ne kao oruzje.

Regulativa pripada drzavama za godiste kad mozes da kupis, a imas ih 50. Za background check bi morao da napravis centralni sistem, za sta nema ko da plati. Ah ok, znaci Klinton uspeo, jer republikanci nisu bili placeni a Obama nije jer su republikanci placeni. Super zakljucak. Zasto nisu ti Senatori izglasani od svojih glasaca ako ih placaju lobisti a njihovi glasaci su protiv?

Vidi, to radi za US 200+ godina, ja znam u koju sam se zemlju doselila. Znaci za to nema koncenzus, tu se sva prica zavrsava, jer ljudi imaju pravo da uredjuju svoje drustvo. Nije to neko provalio fazon, nego je to jedna stvar koja sprecava divljanje drzave.

Nije izgovor, to su osnovni postulati na kojima americki sistem funkcionise. Prosto za to nemas koncenzus. Zato sto je amerima jos uvek bitnija sloboda. Ja se slazem da bi background check trebao da bude bolji, ali sistem za to ne postoji. Odgovor nije "treba zabraniti oruzje" jer se oruzje svejedno moze kupiti. Lakse bi bilo da skole rade bolji posao po pitanju otkrivanja ovakvih slucajeva, i bolji mental care, za to je lakse postici koncenzus.

Pa jbga morali bi da prvo promene godiste regrutacije. pa da menjaju background check za koji ne postoji vecina... Za to vreme skole se bave gender identity a prosli im ovakvi slucajevi. To sto pricas je protivustavno. Drugi amandman je jasan po tom pitanju, da imaju pravo da kupe oruzje da se brane od tiranije. To definitivno nije pistolj i lovacka puska. Prosto nemas vecinu koja podrzava ni background check.

Nazalost, moze I u rat da ide da pogine, ali cigare I pivo, nista. Kako se ovako bolesna deca provuku kroz skolski sistem da niko ne primeti I ne reaguje? Onaj prethodni je bukvalno na pitanje sta planira za raspust rekao "ubistvo I samoubistvo", poslali ga na razgovor kod skolskog savetnika, rekao da se salio...I nista.

Molim? Hoces da kazes da Tramp ima teroristicku organizaciju? Predsednik amerike koji je u to vreme validni predsednik...Znaci sam Dorsi je rekao da je to pod pritiskom a ne zakonski.

Slazem se, nazalost. Nije da smo ovo ocekivali.

Naravno, sad idem za SR pa kad se vratim onda sam beskucnik, dok ne nadjem nesto na FL 🙂 imacu privremeni smestaj.

Ako pozivaju na terorizam, ne. To je protiv zakona, ili organizuju terorizam, ISIS je teroristicka organizacija, ne politicka. Dozvoljavaju iranskim mulama da pozivaju na unistenje izraela... Nema veze od cega imaju najvecu zaradu, kad gube pare. Twitter je u gubicima. Znaci nemam pojma o kakvom profitu pricas, kad sami zaposleni kazu da im profit nije cilj, nego upravo socijalizam.

Philadelphia officials are bringing back masks in public schools in another effort to bring back face-coverings after officials implemented city-wide mask mandate last month that only remained in place for a matter of days before its subsequent lifting. .... The bizarre decision was widely panned by residents, and no other blue cities followed the eastern Pennsylvania city's lead. Only days after the mask mandate went into place was it repealed, with officials then stating it was their plan all along to do so. Covid cases in Philadelphia county, which is mostly comprised of 1.5 million residents of the city, have jumped this month, up to around 500 per day after spending much of last month in the 300s, according to most recently available data from early last week. Deaths in the city have remained in the single digits for around two months, though. .... The order will last indefinitely, and will apply to both students and staff members at public schools in the city. There is an estimated 200,000 students and 18,000 staff members the orders will apply to. Ovi ljudi nisu normalni, toliko su pod uticajem sindikata https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10849681/Philadelphia-require-masks-schools-again.html

Negativno. Mi ne pricamo o pristojnoj komunikaciji nego o cenzuri misljenja i ideja. Nemam pojma, oni kazu tako - valjda znaju zasto rade to sto rade i zasto im je firma neprofitabilna? Neki vide, ali nista do Novembra osim ako nisi mislio da pokrenu gradjanski rat?

To se zove auto cenzura. Pazim sta pricam da ne uznemirim vodje... Pogledas ona dva videa i vidis da to nije radjeno zbog profita, upravo suprotno, njih uopste nije briga za profit nego da kontrolisu slobodu govora, iz svojih ideoloskih razloga. Da je zbog profita, twitter bi bio profitabilan, a nije. Dok zaposleni govore kako su radili 4 sata u kvartalu...

Zasto imamo inflaciju, dodatni razlozi, jako interesatno misljenje: This puts the president’s regulation obsession in perspective. In its first year, Team Biden added more than 72,000 pages of regulations, executive orders and agency notices. That’s 25% more than the Trump administration added in its first year, according to my review of the Federal Register. Biden’s team also pushed through more major regulations in his first year than any president in modern US history — 69 such regulations compared with 22 under Donald Trump and 52 under Barack Obama. These mandates, by definition, cost more than $100 million a year or have substantial effects on the economy. The list includes, most recently, a massive Environmental Protection Agency decree forcing cars to meet unprecedented and potentially unachievable mileage standards. The Biden administration is also forcing retirement plans to take “climate change” into account and making it harder for independent contractors to find work. Biden even repealed a commonsense policy that sunsets old regulations that haven’t been updated in years. All told, the cost of Biden’s regulations far outpaces that of his predecessors’. In his first 12 months, he saddled the economy with more than $200 billion in higher costs, per the American Action Forum. That’s three times more than Obama imposed and 40 times what Trump did. So businesses are spending at least 131 million more hours annually complying with Washington’s mandates and dictates. Since time is money, that’s extremely expensive for the consumers who ultimately get stuck with the bill. https://nypost.com/2022/05/23/its-not-just-spending-bidens-record-regulations-are-driving-inflation-too/

Ti znas da je libel iskljucen is slobode govora? Bukvalno, zakonski. Znaci postoji sloboda govora, zakonski, po ustavu, i zna se koje stvari su izuzete.

Procitaj ponovo sta sam ti napisala. Nikakve veze sa Trampom. Nego sa evolucijom interneta. Toliko si se fokusirala na par republikanaca koji su banovani, da ne kontas da algoritam mnogo vise utice na sve druge, jer je namesten da promovise samo ono sto zaposleni u twitteru podrzavaju, idi pogledaj ona dva videa Project veritas da malo skontas da ne mora sve da bude o tvojoj opsesiji Trampom.

Jel ti ne razlikujes vlasnistvo od pravne pozicije upotrebe? Mozda ti nije jasna upotreba izraza town sq? Savrseno je vidljivo da jesu postali javna platforma. Iz tog razloga su svojevremeno dobili zastitu section 230. Da bi se razvili kao javna platforma. I sve je bilo ok dok tu poziciju nisu poceli da zloupotrebljavaju.