Angelia

Pa Greenwald je definitivno levo. Dobitnik Pulitzera, covek koji je pustio pricu o Snowdenu....nije neki nebitan lik. Inace on je objavio razmenu sa urednicima, i definitivno su mu trazili da ukloni iz clanka bilo kakvo pominjanje da je Biden mozda korumpiran. Inace cela prica oko laptopa je upravo explodirala. Ovo je Hilari i server 2016 ispocetka. Zasto su cekali ovoliko dugo da objave - samo oni znaju. Ali za Bidena je naredna dva dana samo damage control, ukoliko mediji ne cenzurisu pricu.

Procitaj Zoki click Twitter je inace odlucio da oslobodi NYP account, koji su drzali dve nedelje zatvorenim.

La, la, la I jesam primetila, samo sto je to neprofesionalno, opasno i totalitarno, da ne pominjemo protivustavno

Cenzura medija i auto-cenzura koja se desava ovih dana je neverovatna. I definitivno pokazuje problem koji imamo u medijima. Levicari su krenuli da jedu svoju decu. Glenn Greenwald je dao otkaz u mediju u kome je bio su-osnivac, zbog pokusaja cenzure texta u kome kritikuje medije za ponasanje sa pricom o Bidenu i laptopu, i gde poteze neka teza pitanja. Text je objavio u izvornom obliku na svom blogu: TITLE: THE REAL SCANDAL: U.S. MEDIA USES FALSEHOODS TO DEFEND JOE BIDEN FROM HUNTER’S EMAILS Publication by the New York Post two weeks ago of emails from Hunter Biden's laptop, relating to Vice President Joe Biden's work in Ukraine, and subsequent articles from other outlets concerning the Biden family's pursuit of business opportunities in China, provoked extraordinary efforts by a de facto union of media outlets, Silicon Valley giants and the intelligence community to suppress these stories. One outcome is that the Biden campaign concluded, rationally, that there is no need for the front-running presidential candidate to address even the most basic and relevant questions raised by these materials. Rather than condemn Biden for ignoring these questions -- the natural instinct of a healthy press when it comes to a presidential election -- journalists have instead led the way in concocting excuses to justify his silence. After the Post’s first article, both that newspaper and other news outlets have published numerous other emails and texts purportedly written to and from Hunter reflecting his efforts to induce his father to take actions as Vice President beneficial to the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, on whose board of directors Hunter sat for a monthly payment of $50,000, as well as proposals for lucrative business deals in China that traded on his influence with his father. Individuals included in some of the email chains have confirmed the contents' authenticity. One of Hunter’s former business partners, Tony Bubolinski, has stepped forward on the record to confirm the authenticity of many of the emails and to insist that Hunter along with Joe Biden's brother Jim were planning on including the former Vice President in at least one deal in China. And GOP pollster Frank Luntz, who appeared in one of the published email chains, appeared to confirm the authenticity as well, though he refused to answer follow-up questions about it. ..... Publication of that initial New York Post story provoked a highly unusual censorship campaign by Facebook and Twitter. Facebook, through a long-time former Democratic Party operative, vowed to suppress the story pending its “fact-check,” one that has as of yet produced no public conclusions. And while Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey apologized for Twitter’s handling of the censorship and reversed the policy that led to the blocking of all links the story, the New York Post, the nation’s fourth-largest newspaper, continues to be locked out of its Twitter account, unable to post as the election approaches, for almost two weeks. ..... The few mainstream journalists who tried merely to discuss these materials have been vilified. For the crime of simply noting it on Twitter that first day, New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman had her name trend all morning along with the derogatory nickname “MAGA Haberman.” CBS News’ Bo Erickson was widely attacked even by his some in the media simply for asking Biden what his response to the story was. And Biden himself refused to answer, accusing Erickson of spreading a "smear." ....... To justify her own show’s failure to cover the story, 60 Minutes’ Leslie Stahl resorted to an entirely different justification. “It can’t be verified,” the CBS reporter claimed when confronted by President Trump in an interview about her program’s failure to cover the Hunter Biden documents. When Trump insisted there were multiple ways to verify the materials on the laptop, Stahl simply repeated the same phrase: “it can’t be verified.” After the final presidential debate on Thursday night, a CNN panel mocked the story as too complex and obscure for anyone to follow -- a self-fulfilling prophecy given that, as the network's media reporter Brian Stelter noted with pride, the story has barely been mentioned either on CNN or MSNBC. As the New York Times noted on Friday: "most viewers of CNN and MSNBC would not have heard much about the unconfirmed Hunter Biden emails.... CNN’s mentions of “Hunter” peaked at 20 seconds and MSNBC’s at 24 seconds one day last week." ....... First, the claim that the material is of suspect authenticity or cannot be verified -- the excuse used on behalf of Biden by Leslie Stahl and Christiane Amanpour, among others -- is blatantly false for numerous reasons. As someone who has reported similar large archives in partnership with numerous media outlets around the world (including the Snowden archive in 2014 and the Intercept’s Brazil Archive over the last year showing corruption by high-level Bolsonaro officials), and who also covered the reporting of similar archives by other outlets (the Panama Papers, the WikiLeaks war logs of 2010 and DNC/Podesta emails of 2016), it is clear to me that the trove of documents from Hunter Biden’s emails has been verified in ways quite similar to those. ....... Second, the oft-repeated claim from news outlets and CIA operatives that the published emails and texts were “Russian disinformation” was, from the start, obviously baseless and reckless. No evidence — literally none — has been presented to suggest involvement by any Russians in the dissemination of these materials, let alone that it was part of some official plot by Moscow. As always, anything is possible — when one does not know for certain what the provenance of materials is, nothing can be ruled out — but in journalism, evidence is required before news outlets can validly start blaming some foreign government for the release of information. And none has ever been presented. Yet the claim that this was "Russian disinformation" was published in countless news outlets, television broadcasts, and the social media accounts of journalists, typically by pointing to the evidence-free claims of ex-CIA officials. ...... Third, the media rush to exonerate Biden on the question of whether he engaged in corruption vis-a-vis Ukraine and Burisma rested on what are, at best, factually dubious defenses of the former Vice President. Much of this controversy centers on Biden's aggressive efforts while Vice President in late 2015 to force the Ukrainian government to fire its Chief Prosecutor, Viktor Shokhin, and replace him with someone acceptable to the U.S., which turned out to be Yuriy Lutsenko. These events are undisputed by virtue of a video of Biden boasting in front of an audience of how he flew to Kiev and forced the Ukrainians to fire Shokhin, upon pain of losing $1 billion in aid. But two towering questions have long been prompted by these events, and the recently published emails make them more urgent than ever: 1) was the firing of the Ukrainian General Prosecutor such a high priority for Biden as Vice President of the U.S. because of his son's highly lucrative role on the board of Burisma, and 2) if that was not the motive, why was it so important for Biden to dictate who the chief prosecutor of Ukraine was? ....... That a media outlet should even consider refraining from reporting on materials they know to be authentic and in the public interest because of questions about their provenance is the opposite of how journalism has been practiced. In the days before the 2016 election, for instance, the New York Times received by mail one year of Donald Trump's tax returns and -- despite having no idea who sent it to them or how that person obtained it: was is stolen or hacked by a foreign power? -- the Times reported on its contents. Veoma interesantan text i analiza zasto mediji stite Bidena, a i zasto ima dovoljno materijala da se ispituje Bidenovo koriscenje pozicije. Predugacak je da celog kopiram pa koga interesuje ima link.

Ma podseticu te ja: The study’s conclusions are supported by Covid-19 testing data in many of the cities that were home to prevalent protesting. For instance, the Minneapolis Department of Health reported that more than 15,000 people were tested at centers set up in communities affected by the protests, and 1.7% of tests came back positive—below the statewide average of about 3.6%. According to the Washington Post, protest attendees in Minneapolis returned positivity rates of less than 1% and that “officials believe the low infection rates reflect that the protests were outside, that most people wore masks and that people spent most of their time in motion, circulating through the crowd.” NPR reported last week that parties—not protests—are believed to have caused coronavirus spikes in Washington. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/07/01/research-determines-protests-did-not-cause-spike-in-coronavirus-cases/?sh=395e95927dac The leading theory to explain this paradox is that being outdoors is safer than indoors. Numerous studies support this. Japanese researchers, for example, found the odds of indoor transmission of the coronavirus were about 19 times greater than in the open air. But a new study funded by the National Bureau of Economic Research offers another explanation: The protests prompted an overall increase in people staying home, which mostly offset any impact of transmission among protesters. https://www.inquirer.com/health/coronavirus/coronavirus-no-spike-cities-despite-protests-big-surge-in-states-that-reopened-20200627.html That seemed to be especially true in areas where the media reported on violence at protests, the study concluded: “We generally find increases in the percent of residents staying at home full-time and time spent at home for both sets of protests [peaceful or violent], though effects are expectedly stronger when protests are accompanied by media reports of violence.” As a result, the study didn’t detect an increase in Covid-19 cases. “We went in not knowing if we would find an increase in cases, a decrease in cases, or no effect,” Dhaval Dave, an author of the study, told me. “It was somewhat surprising to us.” If anything, there may have been a decrease in Covid-19 cases due to the protests, the study found. But Dave cautioned against making too much of that finding, since it wasn’t statistically powerful. https://www.vox.com/2020/6/26/21300636/coronavirus-pandemic-black-lives-matter-protests Lucky us - znaci sto nasilniji protesti to manje obolelih.

Pa strucnjaci i vlasti. Vec si zaboravila?

Pa valjda ne, tako su nam rekli u vreme proslih riots, da su u stvari smanjili sirenje virusa, pa tako ocekujem i od predizbornih skupova Poenta je da niko ne obraca paznju na virus, dok ne prodju izbori.

Ali preizborni skupovi ne pale i ne pljackaju ....

Mi imamo riots, mislim koga briga za virus Cekam da prodju izbori.

Njegova reakcija jeste cudna. A i gde je Hunter da kaze nije istina? Pogotovo u kampanji. Ne mozes reci da nisu sumnjivi samo zato sto ne znamo kako je laptop dospeo do FBI. U svakom slucaju ne mislim da ce republikanci tek tako odustati od istrage.

Ja bi icekivala da neko ko je nevin demantuje, da kaze "Nije tacno, nije njegov kompjuter, nije se nikad desilo, sve je to laz". Umesto toga on govori kako nista nije bilo inappropriate, da je to ruska kampanja.... A to izgleda kao izbegavanje odgovora.

Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic with millions infected and numerous fatalities. Questions regarding the robustness, functionality, and longevity of the antibody response to the virus remain unanswered. Here we report that the vast majority of infected individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 experience robust IgG antibody responses against the viral spike protein, based on a dataset of 30,082 individuals screened at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City. We also show that titers are relatively stable for at least a period approximating 5 months and that anti-spike binding titers significantly correlate with neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2. Our data suggests that more than 90% of seroconverters make detectible neutralizing antibody responses. These titers remain relatively stable for several months after infection.

Nemam pojma Baby, da nije FBI potvrdio da nije nikakva malverzacija, i da su u posedu laptopa jos od decembra, ja bi mislila da nije tacno. Drugo ni Biden nije negirao da je laptop vlasnistvo sina. Uz to kazu, nisam videla (nije ni potvrdjeno), da je njihov advokat poslao pismo trazeci da ga dobije nazad. Ako uzmes te cinjenice u obzir - veoma moguce. Sad jos imas i svedoke, telefonske poruke.... Naravno sve sto nisam licno videla ili nije potvrdjeno istragom, ja sam sumnjicava.

Papiri nadjeni. Bas me interesuje sta je u njima kad su ovoliko gradili misteriju

Mislim glasovi koji nemaju datum slanja jasan da su poslati pre dana izbora. Takvi se nikad pre nisu racunali pa ne vidim ni zasto bi sada. Ali to ce odluciti SC.

Ma da, oni su trazili da se prihvate glasovi koji nisu prethodno bili po zakonu zato sto hoce da odrade ok posao A ne zato sto hoce da uvuku vise glasova koje inace ne bi racunali. Tako da je GOP potez potpuno legitiman. Znaci oni samo odgovaraju na ono sto su Dems uradili pre mesec dana, i pokusavaju da ih blokiraju.

Nema tu nikakvog spina, znaci cinjenica je da su to uradili pre mesec dana i da je GOP krenuo da ih blokira. Bez postmark nije bilo pravilo pre toga. Ja nisam procitala njihov podnesak da vidim da li je "sa ili bez", valjda ti jesi ili samo zakljucujes tako, posto objasnjenje je: Republican legislators and the Pennsylvania Republican Party asked the justices on Sept. 28 to put the Pennsylvania court’s ruling on hold. They argued that the portion of the ruling allowing unclear postmarks would result in the counting of some ballots that are actually sent after Election Day, thereby violating federal election law and the U.S. Constitution. Znaci ja zakljucujem da se odnosi na one "bez" Ko sad spinuje?

Pa i nije ti neki argument za zasto. PA sud je odluku o brojanju glasova koji nemaju validni postmark napravio pre mesec dana. Ne vidim razlog zasto se to ne bi proveravalo na Sc kao ok. Mislila sam imas neki pravni argument zasto bi glasali 8:0. Iako ocekujem da SC odbije ovako blizu izbora, sto nije pravni argument vec politicki.

A ako su se zarazili na poslu?

Zasto?

Hmmmm Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, will tell "Tucker Carlson Tonight" in an exclusive interview Tuesday evening that Joe Biden's denials of knowledge or involvement in his son's foreign dealings are "a blatant lie." Bobulinski, a Navy veteran and the former head of SinoHawk Holdings -- which he describes as a partnership between the CEFC China Energy conglomerate and two Biden family members -- told Carlson that he almost walked out of last week's second presidential debate when Biden discussed the topic. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-tony-bobulinski-tucker-carlson-joe-biden

Toliko su bili pogodjeni sto je naoruzani napadac upucan da su morali odmah da opljackaju par radnji: Following Wallace's death, which was recorded and posted on social media, hundreds of people -- some armed with bricks -- protested in the 52nd Street commercial district, and the demonstration quickly turned violent. Police cars and dumpsters were set ablaze and NBC10 Philadelphia reported that at least 30 police officers were hurt. A 56-year-old sergeant was struck by a truck and was hospitalized with a broken leg, among other injuries. Stores including several Rite Aid pharmacies, a restaurant, and clothing and shoe shops were broken into. Two ATMs were also reported to have been smashed. More than 30 people were arrested during the confrontation, according to police. The Philadelphia Police Department confirmed to Fox News that two women and four men were arrested in looting at Snipe Sneaker Stores, four men were arrested in looting at the American Kids Store, seven men were arrested in looting at three Rite Aid locations, one man was arrested in looting at Jessabelle Restaurant and five juveniles were charged with looting at a Foot Locker.

Negiranje mu je bilo mnogo izokola - nisu negirali da laptop nije njegov, nisu negirali da su mailovi lazni. Definitivno postoji pokusaj da se zataska, ali je pitanje kako ce biti iskoristeno.

Daj molim te, navodis stvari od kojih vecinu rade dems, kao Trampov autoritarizam? Koje to 3 on ne radi, pa cu te pitati sta od ovoga nije radjeno od strane dems....ili ne rade sada.

ACB je zvanicno imenovana kao sudija. kako ce ovo uticati na izbore? Da li to znaci da ce Tramp dobiti u landslide ili da ce republikance demotivisati u glasanju sada jer su postigli svoj cilj? bice interesatno za gledati, u svakom slucaju jeste istorijski presedan koliko ce ljudi glasati. Malo je bilo smesno danas citati da je AOC komentarisala kako su redovi za rano glasanje "voters supression" a mogla je lepo da glasa postom Kakva drama queen.... prijatelj mi kaze da se u kalifornija odvija nevidjena kampanja za Trampa - kaze ne pamti ikad takve kampanje za bilo kog republikanca a glasa oko 20 godina, znaci ne pamti Regana. Cali momci jel imate neke informacije?