Jump to content

wwww

Član foruma
  • Posts

    12,937
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by wwww

  1. videla sam kad je izasao, mozda dan-dva posle prikazivanja na tv.
  2. gledala sam pre neki dan neki intervju Ozma kod neke voditeljke Gojgic, ako se ne varam (moze biti da je ona neko poznato ime). bas je bila odlican emisija, oboje su bili odlicni.
  3. wwww

    Novak vs State

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-16/serbians-belgrade-angry-australian-government-novak-djokovic/100759260 Key dates in the Djokovic saga On November 18, Djokovic is granted a temporary activity (subclass 408) visa. Temporary activity visas enable people to work in Australia on a short-term basis, and subclass 408 covers sporting activities. On November 29, Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt writes to Tennis Australia chief executive Craig Tiley, saying players wishing to enter Australia quarantine-free must be fully vaccinated and cannot count a previous infection as a reason for exemption. On December 16, Djokovic undertakes both PCR and rapid antigen COVID tests, according to a statement put out by the tennis star. On December 17, Djokovic participates in events having not yet received a positive COVID test result. On December 18, Djokovic takes part in a media interview despite having received a positive result on the PCR test. On December 30, Djokovic receives a letter from the Chief Medical Officer of Tennis Australia stating he has been granted a "medical exemption from COVID vaccination" on the grounds that he had recently recovered from COVID-19. On January 1, Djokovic receives an automated online confirmation via the Australian Travel Declaration website/app that he met the requirements for a "quarantine-free arrival into Australia where permitted by the jurisdiction of your arrival". Just before midnight on January 5, Djokovic arrives in Melbourne on a flight from Dubai and is detained at the airport. In the early hours of January 6, Djokovic is interviewed by Border Force officials before his visa is cancelled and he is transferred to a Melbourne immigration detention hotel. Later that day, his lawyers file a challenge against the cancellation of his visa. An injunction is granted to allow Djokovic to remain in the country until January 10, the same day a hearing is scheduled in the Federal Circuit Court. On January 10, the court finds Djokovic's visa was unreasonably cancelled and orders his release from detention. After his release, the tennis star publicly states his intention to stay in the country and compete at the Australian Open. On January 13, the Australian Open draw takes place and a match between Djokovic and compatriot Miomir Kecmanovic is scheduled for the first round of the tournament. On January 14, Immigration Minister Alex Hawke uses his ministerial powers to cancel Djokovic's visa on "health and good order grounds". Later that day, Djokovic's lawyers lodge an application at the Federal Circuit Court to appeal against the cancellation. On January 15, the Federal Court confirms it will hear Djokovic's application before a full bench. Djokovic is taken back to immigration detention. On January 16, the Federal Court dismisses Djokovic's application before a full bench.
  4. wwww

    AO 2022

    koji bi to fazon bio!
  5. wwww

    Novak vs State

    (tvoj post mi samo sluzi kao povod za komentar, nemo' da se ljutis ) e pa cvrc! treba li da se ponasa "kao svi na tom nivou" i da ga bas briga za sve ostalo ili da se suprotstavi (nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen = to the best of his knowledge and ability) cemu god smatra da je generalno nepravedno? nikako da se dogovorimo i stalno saljemo konfuzne signale (kao i AO/TA i Australija). tako i sad tokom sveg ovog galamatijasa odmah su se javili neki da zahtevaju momentlno da se on pobrine za one azilante, te da uradi ovo, te da uradi ono (ministar ga sutnu iz zemje jer mu po definiciji pripada uloga roel model-a za mladje generacije, ali samo onakva kakvu "mi" zelimo ). kao i s onom porukom oko Rio Tinta i protesta: jedni ga kritikuju sto nije vise rekao, drugi sto se svrstao, treci ... svetu nikako da ugodi! Jedni ga hvale, drugi žale, treći kažu: "E, moj brale, taj je bio kvaran kao šupalj zub".
  6. wwww

    Novak vs State

    Ide kod zene i dece.
  7. wwww

    Novak vs State

    da, ali svi oni upotpunjuju sliku o svemu ovome (a Novakova tema je odavno otisla do djavola i uopste ne lici na ono na sta bi fan tema trebalo da lici, Boxy najbolje zna, odrzavajuci Fedovu temu)
  8. wwww

    Novak vs State

    pa Sandgren sad ima crno-na-belo dokaz za svoje teorije (za razliku od onih ranije koje je retwitovao itd.) to je dodatna tragedija: antivaxerima i ostalim teoreticarima zavere je pruzen, crno-na-belo, u lajvu DOKAZ o kome su oni godinama pricali i pokusavali da nekako izfabrikuju od nekih drugim dogadjaja raznim manipulacijama. lepo je rekao Novakov advokat: jeste li razmislili kakav ce ovo biti vetar u ledja antivaxerima ako ga deportujete? da ne bude zabune, za Novaka je bolje da se makne iz celog tog haosa (dok je jos ziv, jer mi se cini da ni scenario Monika Seles uopste nije bio nerealistican). Rekla sam i da je za njega bilo najbolje da je posle one prve presude rekao: fino, ali ja sad nisam ni u fizickom ni u prihickom stanju da igram turnir, cao, zdravo do vidjenja. i da se nikada vise ne vrati u Australiju.
  9. wwww

    Novak vs State

    budite fini prema njemu. evo, Koreca je bio sasvim fin.
  10. wwww

    Novak vs State

    pa upravo je to i poenta. dzabe sad WTA da pokusava kao nesto da uradi - ima da ih posalju u tri lepe (kao i do sada, samo sto ce im sada jos prilepiti samarcinu u vidu ovog postupla Australije).
  11. wwww

    Novak vs State

    reakcija jos jednog tenisera (za one koji ne prate tenis a pisu ovde): da li to znaci da nece i u buducnosti? A sta cemo s Peng? Ovim je i za nju sve zavrseno.
  12. wwww

    Novak vs State

    Serena i Venus su godinama bojkotovale Indian Wells zbog ovog: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/361673-venus-and-serena-williams-boycotting-indian-wells-9-years-and-counting In those days there were often subtle comments made in certain media quarters, hinting that the outcome of their matches was pre-ordained. tako da Novak ne treba vise nikada u zivotu da kroci na tlo Australije. A ako ga kojim slucajem ikada vvise u buducnosti pozovu tamo (kad se penzionise) treba da se zahvali i kaze da se plasi za licnu bezbednost i da jos uvek vuce traume od poslednje posete. da ih sve redom (koga god moze, od medija do drzave i politicara, TA) tuzi - to bi definitivno trebalo da uradi. (cekamo sad hoce li ATP naci neki paragraf da ga i oni kazne ni to me uopste ne bi ni malo iznenadilo)
  13. wwww

    Novak vs State

    Ne, njoj viza nije poništena odlukom ministra na osnovu tog člana. i ona je dobila 3 godine zabrane. ona je negde 38 godina stara dubl igracica, tako da se ona tamo definitivno vracati nece. sad me samo zanima da li ce i ona i Novak dobiti pola prajz manija za R1 kakvo je pravilo za igrace koji se kvalifikuju ali povuku s turnira.
  14. https://theconversation.com/why-novak-djokovic-lost-his-fight-to-stay-in-australia-and-why-it-sets-a-concerning-precedent-175038?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=bylinetwitterbutton evo nekoga ko moze biti da je jedna pristojna osoba (ne poznajemo ga i ne znamo bas sta jos pise) , ali sigurno nema emocija prema Novaku Đokoviću koje mu krive percepciju i onemogućuju ga da bude objektivan (iako je to skroz ljudski): I have a number of concerns with this. https://www.theage.com.au/sport/dangerous-in-a-democracy-civil-rights-groups-alarm-at-government-s-djokovic-case-20220116-p59omd.html ‘Dangerous in a democracy’: Civil rights groups’ alarm at government’s Djokovic case Civil rights proponents say one of the Morrison government’s key reasons for deporting Novak Djokovic was weak and could create a precedent to block travellers with undesirable political views who pose no real risk to the community. Lawyers for Immigration Minister Alex Hawke relied on comments made by the tennis world No.1 in April 2020, before COVID-19 vaccines were created, in which he said he was “opposed to vaccination” but was “no expert”, had an “open mind” and wanted “an option to choose what’s best for my body”.
  15. kad je i Govedarica imao komentar...
  16. wwww

    AO 2022

    OOP objavljen pre nego sto je sud presudio, tako da se Novak povukao posle objavljivanja OOP i onda Rubljov ostaje gde jeste (mrzi me da gledam, ali mozda mu je tu i bolje).
  17. wwww

    Novak vs State

    Troicki je imao neku izjavu, stavila sam pre neki dan.
  18. wwww

    Novak vs State

    ma sad ce on da ti objasni kako si ti "jedna pristojna osoba. To što ti tvoja emocija prema Novaku Đokoviću krivi percepciju i onemogućuje te da budeš objektivna je skroz ljudski"
×
×
  • Create New...