-
Posts
9,863 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by Radoye
-
Jbg to je stvarno bio takav splet okolnosti da se bukvalno svakome moglo desiti a nije moralo nikome.
-
Sejdz je protutnjao kroz nize kategorije i debitovao za Ganasi, pokazao par odlicnih voznji u kvalifikacijama ali u trkama bio preagresivan i puno puta se slupao kad je bio na putu za podijum. Cip to ne tolerise pa je brzo dobio otkaz a onda ostao i bez sponzora, od onda vozi samo na mahove i normalno da ne moze da pokaze pun potencijal kada nema kontinuitet. Meni je on tu negde sa Reholom po talentu, mozda ne sama elita tipa Dikson, Pauer, Rosi, Njugarden ali da su neke stvari isle drugacije momak je mogao imati karijeru tipa Hanter-Rejeve ili Reholove, visestruki pobednik uz mozda srecno uzetu titulu i/ili Indi 500. A Vic stvarno nije puno toga pokazao, on je tu pre svega zbog jakog sponzora i ocekivalo se da ce Andreti raskinuti s njim saradnju jer se znalo da se sponzor povlaci na kraju sezone. Ono sto je iznenadjenje je da su ga nogirali momentalno. Govori se da ce na njegovo mesto u #26 da avanzuje Herta (on vozi u cerka-timu Stajnbrener-Harding-Andreti) a na Hertino mesto ce da uskoci Hincklif.
-
- Zek Vic dobio otkaz u Andreti Autosportu! Njemu ugovor istice na kraju sezone i umesto pregovora o produzetku saradnje on nece voziti ni na preostale 3 trke ove godine. Ceka se potvrda o zameni za bolid #26.
-
NHRA files lawsuit against Coca-Cola over sponsorship termination [UPDATED] By Mark Glendenning | 22 hours ago The NHRA has began legal action against Coca-Cola Co. after the soft drink giant severed its title sponsorship of the sanctioning body’s professional championships through its Mello Yello brand. In a letter to NHRA competitor information website nhraracer.com, NHRA President Glen Cromwell said that the partnership, which began in 2002, was contracted through to 2023, and accused Coca Cola of taking advantage of COVID-19 to break the deal: 2020 is a year we will never forget. As the country and the world paused in the face of COVID-19, NHRA, like other sports sanctioning bodies, canceled and postponed events. We had to do our part to protect public health and our decisions were based on evolving governmental and public health guidance. We worked with our entire racing community, government authorities and experts to return to racing in a prudent way. Now, we are one of the few sports anywhere that’s successfully returned to operating with spectators, with protocols in place to support those operations. Like many organizations, the pandemic impacted our finances. For example, without fans in the stands, we were forced to reduce purses. The good news is that our overall financial health remains strong and we are excited to gear up for our 70th anniversary in 2021. We are taking a bit more time to announce the 2021 national event schedule so we can have fuller information and more certainty. The schedule might look different than before – it might start later and it might start on the east coast – but it will be packed with what everyone expects from NHRA racing. I’m truly proud to say that the NHRA is the largest and greatest auto racing organization in the world, and we have all of you to thank for that, as well as everyone else with a passion for NHRA racing. When the pandemic struck, our entire racing family focused on everyone’s health and safety. On the pro series side, we continued to work closely with our series sponsor, Coca-Cola, and their Mello Yello brand. Even though they decided to withhold a payment from us during the pandemic, they worked with us and all systems were go for their sponsorship to continue, as contracted, through the end of 2023. Recently, Coca-Cola had a change of heart, and told us they would walk away from their agreement to sponsor our professional series — not at the end of 2023, as promised in their agreement, but now, after being with us since 2002. We’re deeply disappointed that they’ve taken this position. NHRA has always treated our sponsors as part of our family. Family sticks together when times get tough. But it seems The Coca-Cola Company is using the pandemic as an opportunity to break their promise. We can’t let that stand. We owe it to everyone who makes the NHRA so excellent – all our employees, teams, tracks, fans, partners and sponsors – to hold Coca-Cola to its promises. Today, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, we filed a lawsuit against The Coca-Cola Company. We have never filed a lawsuit like this in our history, and we never expected to be forced to take action against such a longstanding partner. We value relationships with our sponsors. We do not take this action lightly. But we are unwavering in our belief that we have no other option to protect our rights and the interests of our racing community, especially the racers whose purse was funded in large part by this agreement. Thank you for all you have done these past few months. We will continue to work with the greatest sponsors in the world, and together, we will cross many more finish lines, stronger than we have ever been before. When contacted by RACER for a response, a Coca-Cola Co. spokesperson said: “The NHRA’s allegations against The Coca-Cola Company are unfounded and we will defend the lawsuit accordingly.” This story was updated after publication to include the statement from Coca-Cola Co.
-
Vraca nam se Nedeljko, nekadasnji sef Ferarija Stefano Domenikali ce po svemu sudeci da zameni Cejsa Kerija na celu FOM https://www.racefans.net/2020/09/22/ex-ferrari-boss-domenicali-to-take-over-as-formula-1-ceo/
-
- Sejdz Karam i D&R Rejsing potvrdjeni za Indi GP dabl-heder:
-
http://www.vintagemotorsport.com/2020/09/photos-race-day-elkhart-lake-vintage-festival/
-
au jbt kako ta ruka lose izgleda jos uvek ne smem ni da pomislim sta bi 100% zdrav radio
-
- Potvrdjeno prisustvo 10 hiljada gledalaca za Indi GP dabl-heder (kao sto je poznato, prva trka tamo i Indi 500 vozeni su bez publike).
-
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/246772090005945/
-
Svaka cast Alene!
-
A Forgotten Classic: The Story of 1916 Harvest Classic September 18, 2020 | By Mark Dill https://www.indianapolismotorspeedway.com/news-multimedia/news/2020/09/18/ims-1916-harvest-classic-04-08-2020 Long before NASCAR arrived at the Speedway in 1994 for the Big Machine Vodka 400 at the Brickyard Powered by Florida Georgia Line, the race widely assumed to be the first race run at the famed Indianapolis Motor Speedway that wasn’t the Indianapolis 500 presented by Gainbridge, the Brickyard hosted another major event other than the Indy 500. Named the Harvest Auto Racing Classic, it wrote an obscure chapter in Speedway history 104 years ago, in September 1916. In many ways, 1916 was one of the strangest years in IMS history. Management decided to shorten the Indianapolis 500 to a 300-mile event. War raged in Europe, sharply reducing competition from overseas and casting a shadow on the future of racing at the giant Indiana facility. The Speedway’s visionary founder, Carl Fisher, foresaw America’s inevitable entry into World War I and shared his views at the annual meeting of the track’s investors and management in June of that year. He knew the conflict would force a moratorium on racing at the track and proposed a second event for the year, the “Harvest Classic” in September. Fisher’s goal was to generate enough profits to keep the business afloat until the war subsided and things could get back to normal. Saturday, Sept. 9 was selected for a card of three races, at distances of 20, 50 and 100 miles. The cash purses were $1,000, $2,000 and $5,000, respectively. The race took place just a few short days after a 300-mile spectacular in Cincinnati, the home of a new board track. Board tracks became popular at that time because they were fast and could be assembled at relatively little cost. Taking place Monday, Sept. 4, the race was the inaugural event for Ohio’s short-lived track of wood, attracting 29 entries pursuing a $30,000 purse. Almost 50,000 spectators watched seven cars finish a tough race won by Johnny Aitken in a Peugeot owned by IMS. Originally, 20 cars were entered for the Harvest Classic, but the attrition in Cincinnati took its toll. By race day, the field had dwindled to 14. News reports throughout the week speculated on the participation of Ralph DePalma, the superstar of the day. DePalma’s Mercedes blew an engine while battling Dario Resta for the lead on the board track a few days earlier in Ohio and was not repaired in time to compete in the Indy Harvest Classic. DePalma, winner of the 1915 Indy 500, had been the subject of much controversy in May when he held out for appearance money to drive in the 1916 edition of “The Greatest Spectacle in Racing.” Fisher refused, and DePalma did not run in the May race. All was forgiven by September, and an agreement was reached for the great driver to race one of the Speedway’s Peugeots. Resta, who in May won the only “500” scheduled for less than 500 miles, had blown an engine in Cincinnati and elected not to enter the Harvest Classic. Despite a sunny, postcard-quality day, crowds at the Speedway were disappointing, with little more than 10,000 people in attendance. With the Indiana State Fair closing just the day before, speculation was that the city didn’t have enough energy for another event. Weak ticket sales in the days leading up to the races worried management. On Friday, track General Manager T. E. “Pop” Myers announced he had pushed back the starting time of the event from the previously advertised 1:30 p.m. to 2 p.m. in hopes of attracting working people to leave their jobs early and travel to the Speedway. The Speedway had also announced a silver trophy competition for 21 music bands to round out the event’s appeal. But those efforts failed to yield the desired results, and much of the city missed a terrific show. The 20-Mile Race Ten cars started the first event, set at eight laps, equaling 20 miles. The two shorter races used a rolling start instead of a pace lap. Drivers were instructed to start their cars and hold alignment in two rows of four with two more trailing for 50 yards until they passed under a narrow suspension bridge over the track where starter Charlie Sedwick cast his signals. The front row consisted of Louis Chevrolet in a British Sunbeam, Harry McNey in an Ostewig, Art Johnson in a Duesenberg and Aitken in his Peugeot. Aitken rocketed to the front in the first mile, but the race was far from a cakewalk for the Indianapolis native. Howdy Wilcox, who would win the Indy 500 in 1919, was handicapped by starting at the back of the field and had to work his way through traffic. He drew steadily closer to Aitken, and by lap four was on his tail. Wilcox never made the pass, but the two finished nose-to-tail only 33-hundredths of a second apart, averaging just over 95 mph. The 50-Mile Race The 50-mile race was even more competitive, despite another short field of only nine cars. Wilcox gunned into the lead and held it for the initial 10 miles. Tire problems forced him to pit, allowing Aitken to again lead the field, but he was pressured once again. Englishman Hughie Hughes in a Hoskins Special pushed Aitken and even took the lead briefly on Lap 15. The two racers diced relentlessly, running wheel-to-wheel into the final lap. The Speedway’s electric timing device recorded Aitken’s margin of victory at 28-hundredths of a second for a speed average of nearly 92 mph. The 100-Mile Race The last event of the day was an American Automobile Association (AAA) National Championship race and produced the largest starting field of the day, 14 drivers. Among the entries that sat out the first two events was the Maxwell team of Eddie Rickenbacker and George (Pete) Henderson, as well as Tommy Milton in a Duesenberg. This race marked the first time Milton was entered to drive a race at the Speedway. He would later become the first two-time winner of the Indianapolis 500. Rickenbacker had a big future, too: He purchased the Speedway in 1927 and managed it until selling to Tony Hulman in 1945. As in the other two events, starting order for the 100-miler was relegated to luck of the draw. Duesenberg driver George Buzane started from the pole, leading the field and following Fisher in his Premier Model 6-56 pace car. No surprise that Aitken, known in the day as “Happy Johnny,” was the man to beat. He took an early lead, but Rickenbacker’s Maxwell was fast and hung close. The race was characterized by two great battles. While Aitken and Rickenbacker fought for the lead, Hughie Hughes and Wilbur D’Alene in a Duesenberg disputed third. Aitken held a slight edge, but never more than 100 feet. Rickenbacker, who fans called “Rick,” surged in front on Lap 24 of the 40-lap contest, only to see Aitken slip by again the next lap. Rickenbacker stormed in front once more on Lap 33, but Aitken was back on top the next circuit. With only four laps remaining, a steering arm to Aitken’s right wheel snapped, rendering the car unstable. He slowed markedly, and Rickenbacker shot his Maxwell into first place. There was no shortage of drama packed into those 100 miles. The Maxwell crew noticed Rickenbacker’s right rear wheel wobbling and tried to warn him with gestures from the pits. So close to victory, the daring driver decided to take the risk and pushed on. Coming out of the northwest turn with just 5 miles to go, Rickenbacker’s right rear wheel buckled, and the Maxwell’s axle scraped the bricks and twisted the car backward, destroying the other rear wheel before sliding into the wall. He narrowly escaped being hit broadside by D’Alene and Hughes. Passing the stricken Maxwell, Hughes shot by D’Alene to roar into second place. Walking with riding mechanic Pete Henderson back to the pits, Rickenbacker’s bravery was rewarded with cheers. Equally daring, Aitken, who had noticed Rickenbacker’s wobbly wheel, also saw opportunity. He stayed on the track with only one of his front wheels connected to a steering rod and remained in second place. When his rival failed, he still had to nurse his Peugeot through the final 5 miles. He held on to sweep the day, lowering his average speed to 89 mph, but winning by 19 seconds over Hughes. Hughes, like Aitken, was one of the few drivers to finish in the money in all three races. Prize money was distributed to only four drivers in the 20-miler, to five more in the 50-mile contest and seven in the AAA Championship race. For all the pre-race drama, DePalma failed to pick up any money. For “Happy Johnny,” the sweep netted him $4,600. The 20-mile event paid $400, with $700 for first in the 50-miler and $3,500 in the championship race. Combined with the $12,000 he was awarded for winning in Cincinnati the previous Monday, he picked up $16,600 for winning four straight races against stiff competition in a single week. That’s the equivalent of nearly $400,000 today, adjusted for inflation. Ironically, Aitken’s name is probably as obscure in Speedway history as the Harvest Classic races he won. Although he only raced in two Indy 500s, in 1911 and 1916, he ranks among the most successful competitors ever to appear at the track. He managed the winning Indianapolis 500 teams of 1912 and 1913 and won the pole for the Indy 500 in 1916. What’s more, it is Aitken, not Jeff Gordon or A.J. Foyt, who has more wins at the track than any other driver. His Harvest Classic victories, combined with his 12 wins in four Speedway race meets in 1909 and 1910, give him a grand total of 15 race victories as a driver at the most storied track in the world.
-
Juce bio live stream The Maness Brothers
- 56 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- live music
- concerts
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
@Alen13ASC je odradio posebnu temu, tu ima i satnica selog vikenda
-
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/2700980156856425/
-
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/679100506296629
-
Nisu ovo nikakve ideje niti predlozi kako bi trebalo da funkcionise ovaj konkretan forum. @Amigo je pitao za praksu sa stranih foruma, ja sam preneo neka svoja iskustva. Generalno je moj utisad da je moderacija na domacim forumima mnogo tolerantnija nego na stranim, mada opet i napolju ima foruma ili forumolikih pojava koje su kompletno nemoderisane (npr 4chan i tome slicno) i gde sve prolazi od zlostavljanja zivotinja i pedofilske pornografije do raznih ekstremistickih politickih ideologija.
-
Hoces reci da je i Vjekoslav trebao da dobije trajni ban?
-
Evo ja sam ucestvovao na dosta inostranih foruma a na par sam i moderisao. Pravilnika nema, osim u formi "mission statementa" (tema foruma je blablabla, tu smo da se druzimo i da svima bude lepo, nemojte psovati, nemojte postovati ilegalne sadrzaje, nemojte vredjati jedni druge, i jos koje slicno opste mesto). Vlada nulta tolerancija prema trolovanju (namerno provociranje i dizanje tenzija, skretanje s teme, recnik), postovi se regularno brisu ili edituju za najmanje sitnice, teme se zakljucavaju po "slobodnom sudijskom ubedjenju" a svaka rasprava o moderatorskim odlukama povlaci direktan ban. Sto se tice banovanja vlada politika "three strikes you're out" - prvi je kratak, dan-dva (timeout da se smire strasti), drugi je nedelju do 10 dana (poslednja opomena) treci je trajni, bez izuzetka. Svaka zalba zbog diktature ili manjka slobode govora biva u startu upucana sa "ovo je moja kuca i moja pravila, my way or the highway". Ovde postoji jedno fundamentalno nerazumevanje slobode govora na americki nacin - taj 1. amandman je garancija da te ograni drzave ne mogu goniti zakonski zbog misljenja ili politickog stava ma kakav on bio. To ne znaci da ne postoje realne posledice za izreceno jer se zastita zavrsava na policiji i sudovima - privatna lica i biznisi imaju svako pravo da ti uskrate uslugu ili zaposlenje ako im se tvoji stavovi ne dopadaju, 1. amandman tu ne vazi. Postoje definisani izuzeci - ne sme se diskriminisati po verskom, etnickom, polnom, starosnom, zdravstvenom itd kriterijumu ali politicki stavovi ne spadaju pod tu zastitu i sasvim su fair game. U praksi to znaci da meni niko ne sme da uskrati uslugu ili zaposlenje zato sto sam beo/crn/invalid/stariji od 50/seksualno usmeren ovako ili onako itd, ali ako na svoj FB profil stavim podrsku Alkaidi ili kukasti krst ili pozivam na proletersku revoluciju ili bilo sta sto se ne svidja osobi ili preduzecu s kojom bih da stupim u biznis (dakle: i administraciji foruma na kome bih da pisem) oni imaju svako pravo da mi to uskrate.