Dragan

Tri razloga zašto je Donald Tramp izgubio TV duel Pre TV debate, bilo je veliko interesovanje za debatu: Prema istraživanju, 70 odsto je želelo da laut gleda – a 30 odsto je i dalje verovalo da se na njihovu odluku o glasanju može uticati. Interesovanje za Kamalu Harris bilo je mnogo veće, erklärte rekao je analitičar David Montgomeri za Times Radio. Nije ni čudo: Iako Kamala Harris služi kao potpredsednica, ona je i dalje manje poznata od Donalda Trumpa. Harris stoga ima jasan cilj da se pokaže kao sposoban kandidat i predstavi svoje političke planove. Taktika Donalda Trampa proizilazi iz ovoga: On želi da javno uskrati svom protivniku sposobnost da vodi zemlju. Ako je ova matrica nešto po čemu treba ići, Tramp je očigledno izgubio dvoboj. Ovo su tri razloga. PS Cekaju se objasnjenja kultista da je u stvari sve bilo drugacije. :) Jos jedan zabrinuti neutralac (kome se pripisuju izuzetne geostrateske sposobnosti). Zaboravio je samo cvece i leptirice ... i mir u svetu. :izborzamiss:

Dan je dug, ali od lepe Sahre do AFD-a i ne bas tako dug. Sta kaze Sahra, koliki deo Nemacke bi prepustila kameradu zlom gnomu ? Prva ljubav zaborava nema. PS Interesantno je kako su brzo su se krajnja desnica (AFD i MAGAsi, jer stabilna budala zapravo nema ideologiju, osim obozavanja samog sebe) i krajnja levica (BSW - sto je isto u pitanju, a uz to i jedina veca partija koja nosi ime jednog politicara, sa sve prodajnim djindjuvama sa likom doticne) nasli u tome da treba pustiti da proguta Ukrajinu (sa svim posledicama - milionima izbeglica, deportacijama, ubistvima i torturom i u krajnjoj liniji zatiranjem jedne nacije i njene kulture). Ah da, oni se bore za mir, respektivno za njihove poreske pare

Sta je sad ovo ?

Republicans against Trump Koji je to lazov, to je nevidjeno - a ovakvih primera ima hiljadu.

Si siguran Bar ima jedan razlog za nas muskarcine da glasamo za njega. To je svet o kojem sanjaju USA gradjani. Trump supported invading Iraq in 2002 Donald Trump often touts that he was against the war in Iraq, but in 2002 he expressed support for an invasion. Trump, who was being interviewed by Howard Stern, said that “yeah, I guess so” when asked if he was for invading the country. “Are you for invading Iraq?” Stern asked. “Yeah, I guess so,” Trump responded. “I wish the first time it was done correctly.” At Saturday’s GOP debate, Trump claimed he opposed invading Iraq in the run-up to the 2003 war. “I’m the only one on this stage that said, ‘Do not go into Iraq. Do not attack Iraq.’ Nobody else on this stage said that,” Trump said. “And I said it loud and strong. And I was in the private sector. I wasn’t a politician, fortunately. But I said it, and I said it loud and clear, ‘You’ll destabilize the Middle East.’ That’s exactly what happened.”

Ukrajinsko pojačanje vrši kontranapad izvan Pokrovska Ruski napad na grad za sada gubi zamah

Vic godine. :) AWKWARD! Donald Trump's Economy Boast Prompts Series Of Brutal Reminders

Cini mi se da malo preoptimisticno vidi russke mogucnosti, ali inace dobar komentar. UK announces supply of 650 Martlet missiles to Ukraine in new defense package.

Sve ok. Treba naravno sve proveriti. Problem je sto je stabilni uveo "fake news" kao magicni stapic kojim moze svaku kritiku i svaku cinjenicu da omalovazi, a to koriste i njegovi sledbenici obilato. To je zapravo moja najveca zamerka citavom tom ludilu oko njega - na stranu sto mi je kao osoba odvratan, a kao politicar nistavan - neprestani pokusaji u kojima i uspeva, da ponudi alternativne cinjenice tj. da stvori iluzorni svet u kome cinjenice ne igraju nikakvu ulogu, svako misljenje je podjednako vazno (a njegovo naravno najvaznije) i sve je u nekoj kognitivnoj magli (ili mocvari), a uz to igranje na kartu najnizih osecaja sledbenika.

Upravo tako. Vec 10 godina vrti uvek iste fraze i njegov recnik se svodi na stotinjak reci, uz obavezno isticanje kako je on najnaj, a drugi su smece. Logika za njegove kultiste.

Nije valjda da si i ti presao u tabor "fake news, fake news !!!" ?! Trump tried to explain how he plans to make childcare more affordable. It was a word salad Meandering? Off-Script? Trump Insists His ‘Weave’ Is Oratorical Genius. Former President Donald J. Trump’s speeches often wander from topic to topic. He insists there is an art to stitching them all together. Poenta je da ti mogu naci masu njegovih odgovora, za koje ne bi mogao reci koje pitanje mu je postavljeno i da su mu govori cesto tako zbrkani da verovatno ni on sam ne zna o cemu prica, ali najtuznije je sto kultisti misle da je govorio nesto genijalno i pokusavaju da nadju smisao u besmislu.

Here is the full reply from Trump on child care:

Otkud ti ideja da ja bolje znam kako on zivi tamo (daj citat) ? Druga je stvar da, bez obzira sto neko tamo zivi, ja imam pravo i mogu da kritikujem zverstva koja russka mafijaska tvorevina, podrzana vecinom stanovnika, radi po Ukrajini (a i po russiji). Sasvim logicno. Kao sto je i tvoje misljenje samo tvoje, a njihovo samo njihovo. To sto neko negde zivi ponekad moze biti prepreka da sagleda siru perspektivu. Uostalom ako neko zivi u Moskvi, ne znaci da "zivi" (poznaje stanje) i u celoj russiji. Ko ti brani da pocnes da pricas o Svajcarskoj ? Ja svakako ne - samo bi bilo zgodno da otvoris novu temu da ne bude off ovde. Zasto mislis da bih nekriticki, a posebno ideoloski, branio greske koje je Svajcarska cinila, ili cini ? I zar nije to samo whataboutizam ? Zasto navijas za russe i MAGAse ?

Hoces da kazes da oni koji misle svojom glavom (MAGA+russofili) su na zalost ovde terani na lomacu, ali da ce istorija pokazati da su bili u pravu. I da ce kasnije generacije slaviti stabilnu budalu i zlog gnoma (kao sto sada u russiji slave Staljina). Koje je zapravo to ubedjenje koje spaja MAGAse i russe te se dobrovoljno bore za pravu stvar ? Trump sides with Russia against FBI at Helsinki summit

Insinuiras da ih ima i na ovom forumu ?

Nisam se bavio tim pitanjem, jer su moji ulozi na berzi previse mali da bi me interesovalo. Imali smo inicijativu 2021. "rasteretiti prihode, oporezovati kapital", koja je u svim kantonima odbacena sa 52-70%. Od 1.1.2024. je uveden porez od 15% sa internacionalne firme sa obrtom vecim od 750 mil. na inicijativu OECD, sto mi se cini jako dobrim jer iste stete SVIM drustvima dosadasnjim legalnim trikovima za izbegavanje poreza. Inace o svaajcarskom poreskom sistemu: Salama, čini se, ipak nije tako mršava u ovoj zemlji. Kako bilo cinjenica je da su u mnogim zemljama pravila tako postavljena da pogoduju tome da bogatasi postanu jos bogatiji, a siromasni jos siromasniji i tu treba nesto uciniti. To je cak i u interesu bogatih, jer nemiri u drustvu mogu i njima nastetiti. Dobrovoljni, filantropski, prilozi koji se velicaju u USA mi se ne cine dobrim nacinom da se stanje promeni. Rusi zdusno rade na destabilizaciji Zapada, a kultisti rado zalezu na rudu.

"Imam velikih problema sa Navaljnim Ruski pisac i opozicioni aktivista Sergej Lebedev optužuje Putinove kritičare da u osnovi dele njegov pogled na svet i propagandu.

dobrimag

Jebao im pas mater fasisticku !

Warren Buffett and His Secretary on Their Tax Rates Buffett's secretary since 1993, Debbie Bosanek, sat next to her boss just hours after being invited by the president to the State of the Union address, where the president made her the face of tax inequality in America. Bosanek pays a tax rate of 35.8 percent of income, while Buffett pays a rate at 17.4 percent. "I just feel like an average citizen. I represent the average citizen who needs a voice," said Bosanek. "Everybody in our office is paying a higher tax rate than Warren." ... "I don't pay hardly any payroll taxes," Buffett said. "Gov. Romney hardly pays any payroll taxes, Newt Gingrich hardly pays any payroll taxes. Debbie pays lots of payroll taxes." He lashed out at assertions from many Republican leaders that the "Buffett rule" is class warfare. "If this is a war, my side has the nuclear bomb," Buffett said. "We have K Street. … We have Wall Street. Debbie doesn't have anybody. I want a government that is responsive to the people who got the short straw in life."

Ako se vec gadjamo slikama, ova je realnija. PS Dzaba se svadjate oko poreza. Niti ce to proci u tom predlozenom obliku, niti su brojke vazne. Vazno je pridobiti glasace, najcesce putem plasenja i ocrnjivanja druge strane u cemu stabilna budala prednjaci. Savetnici ga mole da vise prica o inflaciji i imigraciji, a on udara ispod pojasa jer misli da mu je taktika kao protiv Hilari najbolja (a mozda jedino to i zna).

Mislis na ovo - Finance capitalism Izmedju ostalog. In Casino Capitalism (Blackwells, 1986), Susan Strange problemizes the nonsystem that the international monetary system has become. She compares it with a casino whereon the foreign exchange plays as snakes and ladders. She sets the stakes that international finance has become stronger than states and has been deregularized. The Smithsonian Agreement has been weak leading further to benign neglect from the US, the Eurodollar market and OPEC has been strong undermining the Bretton Woods system. There is no state or actor governing the international monetary system and the international financial markets. American banks are made free to pursue their interests since the 1980s strengthened by the possibility to finance American bonds in the world, making a carousel of bond trading with the OPEC and the Eurodollar market. The forces of market integration set by the Bretton Woods system was going through. Mad Money (University of Manchester Press, 1998) updated the analysis of Casino Capitalism to the late 1990s. At the time of her death, she was working on an exposition of her theory of the international money system. Strange argued in Mad Money that complex derivatives, such as credit default swaps, had increased systemic risk in the global financial system. She has been described as a prescient thinker who "foresaw multiple aspects of the global financial crisis of 2008 and its aftermath".

Kad vec pricate o ekonomiji, ovo sam vec jednom postavio, ali nema ni jednog komentara od strane navijaca za stabilnog, sto je veoma simptomaticno - kada se postavi neko pitanje o njegovim namerama/izjavama, onda se to ignorise, ili se iz petnih zila pokusavaju opravdati, ili cak prikazati genijalnim, njegove bedatoce i lazi. Bez izuzetka. To je ujedno razlika izmedju kultista i ostalih. Trump’s 10 Percent Tariffs: Projected Impacts on U.S. Households and Allies * Former president and presidential candidate Donald Trump has proposed a 10 percent tariff on all imports into the United States, which would result in average estimated additional costs per U.S. household of between $1,700 and $2,350 annually. *The top 10 U.S. import partners, which represent nearly 70 percent of all imports, would be hit with tariffs up to 3 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP); retaliatory tariffs against the United States could amount to $200 billion in the event of a tit-for-tat trade war, with the aggregate impact of tariff hikes reaching up to 5 percent of GDP for the country’s largest trade partner. * A targeted 60 percent tariff on China, as candidate Trump also proposed, would balloon additional U.S. consumer costs from $300 billion to over $500 billion and on its own increase household costs by $1,950 annually.