Angelia

To sto ti zoves supervision, je u stvari management, i jeste najtezi deo posla. Micro-management je problem, osim ako ne treniras nekog, pa da bude investicija. Meni je povremeno smesno koliko ljudi ne kontaju zasto je menadzment bitan. Ja imam dosta ljudi koji direktno odgovaraju meni, ali vecina je samnom vise godina - neki cak u dvocifrenim ciframa, pa nije problem. Upravo pred pandemiju sam uzela novog asistenta, a imam par njih, nekog ko je radio da niskim funkcijama ali pokazivao potencijal. I racunam, provescu godinu u treningu ali nakon toga cu dobiti nekog ko zavrsava stvari. Dogodila se pandemija i mi svi moramo da radimo nezavisno, ja ne mogu da radim po par sati na treningu, nema sastanaka za ucenje....Tu sam upravo skontala da ima ljudi koji prosto ne mogu da rade od kuce. Posto meni ta osoba nije mogla da pomogne osim ako nije relativno nezavisna, pridruzim je odeljenju gde imam iskusne ljude, kao ispomoc. I danas sam upravo skontala da su svi zbunjeni, posto su navikli da ja treniram ljude sta ocekujem. Nadam se da sam raspetljala situaciju posto bi mi bilo zao da otpustim nekog samo zato sto nemamo vremena. Nazvala moju najbolju ucenicu koja je sad u vrhu menadzmenta, i rekla joj, treba mi tvoja pomoc da treniras ovu osobu, objasnila problem i uostalom njoj treba najvise pomoci. Nije bezosecajno, rekla sam joj, seti se kako si ti bila kad si dosla da radis (ona je bila totalno promenila industriju), i tako tretiraj novu osobu. Potpuno te razumem, ja sam ista. U normalnoj situaciji imam mnogo vise vremena, ali mi je pandemija napravila izazov, kako da komuniciram sa ljudima na pravi nacin, koji nisu upoznati sa radom. Iako mi je uzelo par sati danas da sve uklopim, nadam se da sam uradila najbolje.

Posalji mom sinu, dobices odgovor brze nego sto si otkucala

Ako ja ne gresim - a mozda gresim, sastanak za odobravanje Pfizera je 16tog

Nije tinejdzer Napunio 21, ionako se on drzi podalje. Mi imamo centralno AC tako da - ako ide kroz vazduh, potpuno je nebitno sto zauzimamo dva razlicita sprata. nego sada pokusavam da izracunam koliko je vremena proslo, da li postoji mogucnost... uz to mislim da je, iako neodgovorno, lepo od njega sto je spreman da pomogne svakome. Nisam ni previse zabrinuta da dobijem virus, nego eto vise njega cuvam od istog.

Reko da prijavim close call danas, koji jos ne znam koliko je close Za praznik isao klinac da poseti prijatelja na Penn State (za one koji ne znaju jedno 3 sata voznje odavde, koledz town, koledz na koji je moj klinac svojeveremeno hteo da ide pa odustao). Naravno ja ga kao svaka zabrinuta (citaj naporna) majka udavim pre puta sa sta je bezbedno a sta ne.....A on naravno "Mama, nisam deteeeee". Mislim da je istrcao iz kuce kad je krenuo Naravno od kako se vratio, ja ga stavim u kategoriju "na posmatranju" (vratio se u subotu) dok se ispostavi da se nije vratio sa Alien u grudima. Nije ni kinuo ni kasljucnuo nijednom, i vec sam pocela da se opustam. Kad malopre kaze "mama znas onog mog druga kod koga me cesto vozis?" drug je na 5 minuta od nas, i povremeno bi g ja odbacila kad se vidjaju - to nije isti prijatelj kao Penn State, zovimo ga No.2. Tu je u celoj ovoj pandemiji jedino isao pre novembra, skupe se njih 4-5 da se vide svakih mozda 3-4 nedelje, i svi tvrde da ne idu nigde - cuvaju se. E pa drug je pozitivan, i cela porodica, za sad znaju 4 clana. I ja naravno kazem uh bas mi je zao jesu ok, i on kaze osim njegove sestre svi su manje vise aimptomaticni, ona ima temperaturu i sl....I onda kaze mislim super da ja nisam dobio Rekoh naravno da nisi - niste se videli vec neke 3 nedelje (optimisticna majka) Kaze a nee, videli smo se onog dana kad smo morali da startujemo moja kola (crkao mu bio akumulator jer nije vozio kola), tad sam vozio njega i sestru i njegovu majku, sestri nije bilo dobro vec, ali nismo znali da je covid, ali su oni svi imali masku u mojim kolima....... Pazi mene cekaj sad da izracunam, dal je to 7 ili 10 dana ili......VOZIO SI NEKOG KOME NIJE BILO DOBRO!!!!! On mrtav ladan - kaze pa nije mi nista, do sad bi znali..... Ja idem da se istusiram hladnom vodom da ga ne udavim ovako 2 m visokog. Cekaj, vec su pomerili odobravanje na 16ti decembar, a trebali su da izbace vakcinu 12og. Ali da plan je u prvoj turi oko 100 mil vakcina.

Ima za TBC a ima i za MMR. Edit: ispravka MMR mislim da je iz neke druge zemlje mozda bas USA, ali znam da sam procitala da se samo odnosi na Mumps.

Kod mene je situacija uvek bila - barem zadnjih 10 godina ako ne i vise, da uglavnom radim "od kuce", i kad to kazem mislim ne idem u kancelariju. Iako mi je dosta posla vezano i za putovanja, sastanke i sl. Sto je ova pandemija ubila. U kancelariju sam isla 2-3 puta nedeljno, i to na kratko - uglavnom za neke sastanke. Imala sam i dve lokacije kao "istureno odeljenje" pa smo to koristili po potrebi. E sad nam se potrefilo, da smo HQ prodali bas pred pandemiju, i to po vrhunskim cenama u to vreme, mislim zgradu, ne firmu. I bili u procesu kupovine nove kad je lockdown objavljen, i mi izadjemo iz ugovora, odradimo da svi rade virtual office, i samo koristimo ova dva isturena odeljenja.... U to vreme bilo ajde mesec dva dok se sve ne otvori.....aha Sad smo u procesu da trazimo nove HQ, posto racunamo za 3-4 meseca trebace nam opet, iako dosta stvari cemo da nastavimo da radimo ovako. bar ce zgrada da bude jeftinije jer su cene pale.... Moram reci da mi interakcija, licna sa ljudima nedostaje, sto nisam nikad verovala da cu reci Inace ja sam skontala da gubitak vremena na voznju tamo-amo, i komfor rada bez uticaja kancelarije, funkcionise odlicno jos pre 10 godina i zato sam presla na remote. Ono sto sam tokom pandemije otkrila je da neki ljudi mogu da rade tako, a neki ne, kao sto si ti sad otkrila za sebe da ti odlicno ide. Nemaju dovoljno ono sto u skoli zovu executive skills - zato i moramo da vratimo neke u kancelarije. Jednostavno se izgube u radu od kuce, i onda ne rade nista. Moj klinac je od marta na zoom nastavi, ali srecom on je na koledzu pa nemam problem malog deteta, ali i on se zali da ovako ne valja. Ne zbog socijalnog aspekta, nego kaze tesko je fokusirati se. Ali pricam sa ljudima koji manje-vise imaju slicnu situaciju kao ti, i to je pakao. Mislim da nije off, osim onog dela u naslovu teme "nehumana neminovnost"

UK odobravanje, MRHA nisu preterane birokrate kao FDA - laksi su u proceduri ali su izuzetno striktni. Iskreno receno ne znam da su pravili velike greske u tome, nisam specijalno cula, ali znam da su i inace daleko brzi nego FDA Hehe uvek pobrkam skracenicu, da dobrano ih znam i verujem im vise nego svima ostalima.

Imali smo i mi jednog sto je napisao knjigu usred pandemije o svom velikom uspehu....sa najvecim brojem umrlim. Neki ljudi imaju jako los osecaj za timing

Dve vesti dana: 1. Ostala sam shokirana CNN je otkrio da je Kina lagala o ciframa obolelih i umrlih. Oni ko kostunica. 2. CDC objavio da su testirali uzorke krvi iz Crvenog Krsta iz decembra 2019 - koja je donirana i nasli pozitivne slucajeve (cak i nakon provere da nije neki drugi virus) The new coronavirus infected people in the U.S. in mid-December 2019, a few weeks before it was officially identified in China and about a month earlier than public health authorities found the first U.S. case, according to a government study published Monday. The findings significantly strengthen evidence suggesting the virus was spreading around the world well before public health authorities and researchers became aware, upending initial thinking about how early and quickly it emerged. Scientists at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found evidence of infection in 106 of 7,389 blood donations collected by the American Red Cross from residents in nine states across the U.S., according to the study published online in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. The scientists based their study on blood samples that the American Red Cross collected between Dec. 13 and Jan. 17 and later sent to the CDC for testing to see if any had antibodies to the new coronavirus, which is named SARS-CoV-2. “SARS-CoV-2 infections may have been present in the U.S. in December 2019, earlier than previously recognized,” the authors wrote. Znaci reagovanje, ne reagovanje ranije...ko zna i koliko ljudi je inficirano transfuzijom, znaci kad je Kina prvi put objavila postojanje virusa, vec je bilo kasno.

Ma ja ono martu trebala da idem za CA a tamo vec bilo dosta slucajeva, bas pred lockdown, i porucim dve vrste jedna n95 (kao za avion) a druge neke platnene sto mozes da stavis filter ....tih prvih par nedelja ni u prodavnicu nisam isla, pa se setim maski kasnije, kad nigde nije bilo da se kupi, kad otvorim prvi paket a ono "made in China" Bila sam srecna sto su par nedelja sedele ne iskoriscene - ali lepo su me sluzile, i sluze. Crne, tako da idu uz svaki outfit

Ja jos imam one sto sam kupila bas pred pocetak pandemije - a n95 nisam ni upotrebila peremo. Iako da sam letela ko ti ko zna kako bi to izgledalo....

Uh znam kako ti je. Kad se osecas bespomocno i samo mozes da sedis i cekas. Uzasno mi je zao da si prosla kroz taj stres, ali sve je dobro sto se dobro zavrsi. Uvek kazem da kad jednom odlucis da budes roditelj, tvoj zivot vise nije tvoj.

Svasta, ovo je kad se od izjave da nedostatak moze da skodi, pretvori u "vi mislite da to leci". A to niko od lekara ko preporucuje uzimanje suplemenata ne govori. I kakva je to izjava "sta ako neko pomisli da ga to stiti"? Pa sta ako pomisli da ga Bog stiti? Vidimo da su svi ovi kojima je otkriven deficit isli kod lekara i otkrili ga prvo Ne znam zasto, ali nekako mi lakse da verujem Cleveland Clinic istrazivacima, nego Neveni, znam da su neki od njih kreteni, ali nisu glupi. umesto toga dobijemo eh da ste zdravi ne bi bili bolesni.

Znaci nema naucnog argumenta, posto u barovima, restoranima i teretani niko izmedju 22 i 5 nece raditi nista drugacije nego ostalih 17 sati u toku dana. A ako hoce da se zabavljaju i piju okupice se u necijoj kuci, ili lokalnom parku do rane zore (ionako je jeftinije) 00

Ne, pricamo o ovome sada posto je ovo nova mera, za koju ne postoji potreba. Znaci nije deo onih prethodnih mera. Znaci nema uticaja na pandemiju. Vec se znalo da sa starim merama restorani ne uticu znacajno na sirenje virusa, tako da restrikcija kako ce otici manje ljudi ne utice na broj zarazenih. Moze da utice da restorani skrate vreme jela na manje od sat ipo da bi povecali broj gostiju koji prodju kroz restoran.....sto bi u stvari imalo kontra efekat. Oni ne rade, ili ako rade, rade sad kao restorani, znaci nebitno. To i dalje nema veze sa nepotrebnim zatvaranjem. Ti objasnjavas kako moze taj neko da ide i tokom dana (kad ima vise ljudi, znaci povecava mogucnost zaraze) ali mi ne dajes argument zasto bi zatvaranje imalo bilo kakve veze sa pandemijom. Znaci nepotrebna blesava mera, zasto - niko nece da odgovori. A to je bila poenta od kako sam pomenula zasto ljudi gube poverenje u mere, zbog ovakvih gluposti, koje samo maltretiraju ljude.

Interesatno da si pitao ovo i evo upravo naleteh na nesto: What have studies into vitamin D and Covid-19 shown? When? September. By who? Cordoba University in Spain. What did scientists study? 50 Covid-19 hospital patients with Covid-19 were given vitamin D. Their health outcomes were compared with 26 volunteers in a control group who were not given the tablets. What did they find? Only one of the 50 patients needed intensive care and none died. Half of 26 virus sufferers who did not take vitamin D were later admitted to intensive care and two died. What were the study's limitations? Small pool of volunteers. Patients' vitamin D levels were not checked before admission. Comorbidities were not taken into consideration. When? September. By Who? University of Chicago. What did scientists study? 500 Americans' vitamin D levels were tested. Researchers then compared volunteers' levels with how many caught coronavirus. What did they find? 60 per cent higher rates of Covid-19 among people with low levels of the 'sunshine vitamin'. What were the study's limitations? Researchers did not check for other compounding factors. Unclear whether or not volunteers were vitamin D deficient at the time of their coronavirus tests. People's age, job and where they lived - factors which greatly increase the chance of contracting the virus - were not considered. When? September. By Who? Tehran University, in Iran, and Boston University. What did scientists study? Analysed data from 235 hospitalized patients with Covid-19. What did they find? Patients who had sufficient vitamin D - of at least 30 ng/mL— were 51.5 per cent less likely to die from the disease. They also had a significantly lower risk of falling seriously ill or needing ventilation. Patients who had plenty of the nutrient also had less inflammation - often a deadly side effect of Covid-19. What were the study's limitations? Confounding factors, such as smoking, and social economic status were not recorded for all patients and could have an impact on illness severity. When? July. By Who? Tel Aviv University, Israel. What did scientists study? 782 people who tested positive for coronavirus had their vitamin d levels prior to infection assessed retrospectively and compared to healthy people. What did they find? People with vitamin D levels below 30 ng/ml - optimal - were 45 per cent more likely to test positive and 95 per cent more likely to be hospitalised. What were the study's limitations? Did not look at underlying health conditions and did not check vitamin D levels at the time of infection. When? June. By Who? Brussels Free University. What did scientists study? Compared vitamin D levels in almost 200 Covid-19 hospital patients with a control group of more than 2,000 healthy people. What did they find? Men who were hospitalised with the infection were significantly more likely to have a vitamin D deficiency than healthy men of the same age. Deficiency rates were 67 per cent in the COVID-19 patient group, and 49 per cent in the control group. The same was not found for women. What were the study's limitations? Independent scientists say blood vitamin D levels go down when people develop serious illness, which the study did not take into consideration. This suggests that it is the illness that is leading to lower blood vitamin D levels in this study, and not the other way around. When? June. By who? Inha University in Incheon, South Korea. What did scientists study? 50 hospital patients with Covid-19 were checked for levels of all vital vitamins and compared to a control group. What did they find? 76 per cent of them were deficient in vitamin D, and a severe vitamin D deficiency (<10 ng/dl) was found in 24 per cent of Covid-19 patients and just 7 per cent in the control group. What were the study's limitations? Small sample size and researchers never accounted for vitamin levels dropping when they fall ill. When? June. By Who?. Independent scientists in Indonesia. What did scientists study? Checked vitamin D levels in 780 Covid-19 hospital patients. What did they find? Almost 99% of patients who died had vitamin D deficiency. Of patients with vitamin D levels higher than 30 ng/ml - considered optimal - only per cent died. What were the study's limitations? It was not peer-reviewed by fellow scientists, a process that often uncovers flaws in studies. When? May. By Who? University of Glasgow. What did scientists study? Vitamin D levels in 449 people from the UK Biobank who had confirmed Covid-19 infection. What did they find? Vitamin D deficiency was associated with an increased risk in infection - but not after adjustment for con-founders such as ethnicity. It led to the team to conclude their 'findings do not support a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of Covid-19 infection.' What were the study's limitations? Vitamin D levels were taken 10 to 14 years beforehand. When? May. By Who? University of East Anglia. What did scientists study? Average levels of vitamin D in populations of 20 European countries were compared with Covid-19 infection and death rates at the time. What did they find? The mean level of vitamin D in each country was 'strongly associated' with higher levels of Covid-19 cases and deaths. The authors said at the time: 'The most vulnerable group of population for Covid-19 is also the one that has the most deficit in vitamin D.' What were the study's limitations? The number of cases in each country was affected by the number of tests performed, as well as the different measures taken by each country to prevent the spread of infection. And it only looked at correlation, not causation. When? May. By Who? Northwestern University. What did scientists study? Crunched data from dozens of studies around the world that included vitamin D levels among Covid-19 patients. What did they find? Patients with a severe deficiency are twice as likely to experience major complications and die. What were the study's limitations? Cases and deaths in each country was affected by the number of tests performed. Imas i novu neku studiju iz Londona: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9005225/Vitamin-supplements-cut-womens-risk-catching-Covid-19-study-claims.html

Kakve veze ima broj zarazenih sa time da je ista situacija u 9.30 i u 10.30? Mozda ti imas neko objasnjenje ali ga ja ne razumem. Prvo sva istrazivanja te demantuju, da se virus ne zadrzava toliko dugo ni u zatvorenim prostorijama ni na povrsinama. Drugo, restorani ne mogu da imaju centralnu klimu za celu zgradu, nije po zakonu. Mozes da imas manju centralnu ako je restoran manji, ali ce i dalje biti odvojen od zgrade. Tako da sorry nisam razumela poentu. Pokusavas da kazes da ako rade duze, iako je isti kapacitet, iako i dalje ljudi ne ostaju duze nego ograniceno vreme...nekako 2 sata duze radno vreme ugrozava vise ljudi? Posto restorani ionako zatvaraju kuhinje u ponoc.... iako do sada po tracingu nema dokaza da se ljudi masovno inficiraju u restoranima, upravo suprotno, imas podatke da to nije tacno, i da se najvise virusa siri u licnim kontaktima, u grupnim okupljanjima (crkva, politicki skupovi). Medjutim posto ovo zadnje nisu mogli da zabrane (probali pa im SC rekao nije ustavno) onda se smisljaju ovakve alibi mere - za koje nema nikakvih naucnih dokaza da menjaju nesto Poeenta i jeste da imas ljude koji dolaze posle 10, namerno kad ima najmanje ljudi, ali ova mera ce ih ugurati u vecu grupu, znaci izloziti ih riziku. Kakve veze ima koliko ljudi zavrsi u teretani do 10 sa zatvaranjem? Jel mozes da mi das razlog kako to zaustavlja pandemiju. A za nocne klubove vec objasnila, oni ionako ne rade kao nocni klub, ako uopste neki radi, a ne rade....jer moraju da sluze hranu. Opet, sve sam ovo objasnila da nema veze sa situacijom u NY, zbog vec postojecih mera. Barovima u restoranima nije dozvoljeno da rade, nema tu nikakve interakcije sa ljudima u restoranu gde se jede u drustvu. Znaci bukvalno nikakva korist od toga samo steta. Ja bih rekla da vi to projektujete SR na USA, pa vam nije jasno da restoran u NY nije kafana na Skadarliji. Imala sam ja svojevremeno pitanje tako od mog roditelja koji je hteo da ga odvedem u lokalnu kafanu da poprica sa ljudima

Iskreno receno meni nije bilo jasno zasto si odgovarala na moj post posto ocigledno nisi razumela zasto su mere neutemeljene i besmislene u tom slucaju (i jos nekim navedenim u tom textu koji sam linkovala). Ako neko kod koga barovi i restorani, rade smanjenim kapacitetom, mislim da su tamo na 25%, i uz to ogranicava goste na 1.5 sat boravka u istom, uz obavezu da kupi hranu da bi imao pice, znaci nema guzve i nema sanse napijanja - dodati na to i jos moraju da zatvore u 10 pm, uopste nema smisla. I objasnjenje da je to zato da se ne bi napijali je totalno besmisleno. Da ne pominjem zatvaranje teretana u 10 pm - nikakvog smisla, niti je bilo kakva argumentacija koju si dala uopste dotakla stvarno stanje. Tvoja argumentacije je kao da nikakva ogranicenja ne postoje - pa kao ajde da zatvore u 10, ovo se odnosi na barove i restorane. U slucaju teretana je samo kontraproduktivno, jer to znaci da ce oni koji dolaze kasno sad jos pokusavati da se uguraju u skraceno vreme i praviti veci problem. Potpuno besmisleno gusenje i to malo biznisa koji pokusavaju da prezive. Isto besmislena mera kao i ona u Kaliforniji, da se ne mogu posecivati rodjaci i prijatelji od 10 uvece do 5 ujutru. Znaci mozes da provedes ceo dan kod nekoga, i pandemija se nece siriti, ali ako prespavas hoce - gde je tu logika? U tom slucaju ja sam zavrsila pricu Imas dosta materijala o uzimanju vitamina kao o najboljoj prevenciji, tj nije prevencija nego kao i ako dobijes virus imaces blazi oblik jer ce ti imuni sistem biti jaci. Sto se tice istrazivanja nisam videla nijedno, drugi link je Cleveland clinic i oni kazu da istrazivanje ne postoji https://healthnewshub.org/vitamins-vs-covid-19-these-3-and-zinc-will-reinforce-your-immune-system/ https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/covid-19-and-supplements-what-we-know-now/ Generalno mislim da se za sada lekari slazu da moze samo da pomogne.

Jel zna neko jel ovo tacno i mozda detalje: Switzerland is emerging as a model for how the coronavirus can be contained without a national lockdown, after daily new infections halved since the start of November despite pubs, restaurants, gyms and sports remaining open in much of the country. The figures were hailed as a triumph for the “Swiss special way” by Swiss government doctors last week, and will be seen as evidence that regional tiers can work in the UK. Rather than ordering a general lockdown, Switzerland allowed regions to decide their own measures and only the worst-hit imposed tough restrictions. But critics have charged that the success came at too high a price, after the country experienced some of the highest death rates in Europe. https://news.yahoo.com/switzerland-halves-infections-without-national-154343012.html

Prvo, ja te nisam pitala da spekulises o mom zivotu, sta ja radim u teretani je moja stvar, sigurno se ne alkoholisem. Kakve to veze ima sa zatvaranjem u 10 pm, sta do 10 se ne znoje - samo posle toga? Kakve to veze ima sa bilo cime, isto radim u restoranu u 7 uvece i u 10 uvece. Pogotovo sto su slotovi da jedes sat ipo. Ne znam sta treba da popijem za to vreme da se napijem.... Ali samo nakon 10 uvece Nesto mi deluje da ti nikad nisi bila u NY ako ti je 100$ fancy vecera i tura pica. To je cena za Applbees a ne za fancy restoran. Znaci nema sta da pije - zabranjeno je tocenje alkohola ako svaka osoba ne poruci po jedno jelo, i ima tacno definicija sta se racuna u jelo. Ima alkoholicara samo oni ne piju uz veceru u restoranu jbte Nemoj pokusavati da odbranis neodbranjivo, znaci gomila ljudi je trazila objasnjenje i nije dobila, zato sto mere nemaju smisla, ali evo ti ces da ih objasnis iako ne znas ni koliko je pice u NY, niti kakve su mere vec postavljene.

I to bi sve imalo smisla kad ne bi postojalo ogranicenje kapaciteta u restoranima i barovima (pa nece biti blize), kao prvo a kao drugo da od kada im je dozvoljeno da rade, cak ni barovi ne smeju da sluze pice bez jela. pa se ti napij. Ili da ti preracunam u najjeftinijim barovima, tura pica za 4 osobe je preko 100$.

Veoma sam prijatno iznenadjena da ima mesta na kojima se ljudi napijaju u teretani To mi je stvarno novost. Kod nas u US u teretanama ne nude alkohol...... Imamo cak i restorane koji ne nude alkohol, i generalno restorani ne sluze za napijanje, za to budes izbacen iz restorana.

Kada se ljudi pitaju zasto ima dosta skepticizma po pitanju mera, i zasto se ljudi bune, ovaj text daje samo primere totalno pogresnih odluka. Izmedju ostalog, i zasto se virus siri i medju onima koji postuju mere: zato sto su mere idiotske There was no way for the general public to know, at first, that the recommendation to stay 6 feet apart originated in part from a 3-foot rule determined by decades-old studies of card-game players, and that the recommended spacing had been doubled on the basis of research into the spread of the original SARS virus through airplane cabins. And what about the widespread rule that each child in school should be allotted 44 square feet of space? WIRED’s David Zweig traced that back to a consultant who’d found it in an education magazine, which in turn had bungled what was already a faulty calculation by an educational nonprofit. Some pandemic guidelines are even stranger and more mysterious. In an effort to stop people from going out unnecessarily and spreading Covid-19 as winter approached in the southern hemisphere, the South African government prevented the sale of open-toed shoes and shorts (unless they were intended to be worn over leggings), on the grounds that any trip to purchase such articles of clothing would be inessential. In a seemingly backward move, the city of Madrid has closed parks but allows some indoor dining to continue. Meanwhile, Canada’s chief medical officer recommended that people engaged in sexual activity wear masks. https://www.wired.com/story/a-lack-of-transparency-is-undermining-pandemic-policy/ Na pocetku texta NEW YORKERS ARE still puzzling over a new, state-wide rule that bars, restaurants, and gyms must close at 10 pm to stop the spread of Covid. Was this based on some brand-new evidence that the virus mutates like a gremlin, getting worse at night? You wouldn’t know it from Governor Andrew Cuomo’s announcement, which did not cite any research whatsoever that might justify this policy. The announcement did claim, however, that New York uses “more science than any state in the nation.” Mera koja je svakom razumnom - kontraproduktivna, ali bi rado cula nauku iza toga....

Ovde negde sam procitala da ce CDC ici na 7 dana....ne znam da li su, nisam stigla da pogledam. Ili 2 dana bez simptoma ako nakon 7 dana jos uvek imas simptome.