wwww

zabole me sta ti ocekujes. mogo bi da prekines da "analiziras" forumase, moralises i propisujes sta bi ko trebalo da pise.

pa da niste obratili paznju na Alcaraza zavrsio bi Albert posao do sada

Kaze Anakon da je Novak 31:2 protiv levorukih igraca koji nisu Nadal (jedan poraz je protiv Melcera) http://yk.freestreams-live1.com/tennis-channeltv/ Vajda nosi Lacoste kacket (verovatno i majicu, ali nisam uspela da vidim marku)

Ja zato na svakom slemu u prvim kolima navijam protiv domacih igraca samo sto je na RG toliko Francuza u zrebu da ne mozes da "postignes" da protiv svakog navijas. a i nekad igraju protiv igraca/igracice koji su mi nesimpaticni (npr. PCB) pa onda morm da navijam i za po nekog Francuza/kinju.

Zverev ce da ispadne od malenog Baeza

a pogledaj raspored za sutra:

pa totalno je logicno da nedelju ispune koliko god mogu: em sto mnogo vise ljudi moze da dodje i gleda meceve (nedelja - neradni dan - ljudi slobodni da odu na meceve u svoje slobodno vreme), em ce se (zbog poznatih problema s vremenom) obezbeditti da se mecevi prvog kola, koji su najkriticniji, zavrse na vreme i manje-vise svi oni koji prodju u 2. kolo imaju iste, fer uslove. pored toga, u sedmici pred RG na "programu" su samo 250 turniri koji imaju manje kola, pa se mogu bez problema zavrsiti u subotu (ATP) odnosno u petak (WTA) umesto dan kasnije nego sto se obicno desava. znaci, nisu nesto ostetili ni manje turnire pred RG (ovde se moze argumentovati da su ovi izgubili jedan dan za prodaju karata, ali bi tu trebalo da bude moguca nekakva kompenzacija od strane RG - bar bi tako bilo fer i poslovno ispravno da je tenis neki sistem koji funkcionise kako treba ) a jedan dan vise da se prodaju karte, tv prava itd. znaci vise para za RG. zato su i ustogljeni Britanci sad resili da se igra i u nedelju na kraju 1. sedmice - mani glupavu tradiciju kad mogu da se zarade pare a i da se obezbedi relaksiraniji program u ponedeljak potom (koji je bio ludilo i uvek kritican sto se tice zavrsavanja meceva). Mene nervira kruto drzanje za tradiciju i opiranje smislenoj modernizaciji. Mislim da sam vec nekoliko puta pisala kako me nervira stav Viskovica koji je protiv "robota" iliti HE i ekvivalentnih sistema koji eliminisu ljudsku gresku kod sudjenja. Njemu se svidja kad se igraci svadjaju i prepiru i u sustini gube koncentraciju na igru. Imali smo prosle godine nekoliko turnira gde su svuda imali HE i kako je sve bilo super i bez problema: samo pratis tenis, a ne neke neteniske stvari (svadju). I sad u Madridu je bilo super kad su koristili onaj specijalni sistem za sljaku, pa jos igraci nisu imali ogranicenje kod chelendza. Milina!

https://www.aapnews.com.au/news/millman-slams-unilateral-wimbledon-ban?share=BmQWuNm Millman slams 'unilateral' Wimbledon ban John Millman has condemned Wimbledon’s "unilateral" decision to ban Russian and Belarusian players amid an extraordinary, impassioned attack on the governance of world tennis. The veteran Australian stalwart, a Player Council representative for the ATP men's tour, also called on the British government to reveal whether it was actually behind the decision, not Wimbledon. Millman, who spoke emotionally about the "disgusting" conflict in Ukraine, also said players' views were being ignored amid a lack of consultation and communication. Speaking after his defeat to Sebastian Korda at the French Open on Tuesday, the 32-year-old said he still thought he would play at Wimbledon but believes the world's biggest tournament could even ban him over his comments. "Look, my old man’s flown over for it, Wimbledon’s hallowed ground, mate, a beautiful place. I love it," Millman said. "But I don’t like how they went about making the decision. "If the whispers are that it’s government guidance, get the government to come out and say it was them. "I’m getting older, there’s probably not going to be so many opportunities to play Wimbledon, so I think I’ll play but maybe I’ll get banned for saying this stuff. "I mean, you can, right? That’s what I’ve had a problem with from the very start - unilateral decisions." Millman volunteered his views in eloquent fashion for 20 minutes about "wrong governance" at the highest levels of the sport. "First, I want to put it out there that I'm against any conflict where people are dying," he began. "The Russia-Ukraine conflict is terrible. My heart aches for the Ukrainian people, Ukrainian players, I hate that. "But I hate all conflict. I didn't like the war in Iraq when collateral damage is seen as innocent people dying. I don't like the UK selling bombs to the Saudis when they bomb Yemen. "I don't like Israel and Palestine conflict, don't like the Libya conflict, anywhere where people are dying. I think that it's rubbish. "But also I don't like unilateral decisions. "There was an opportunity to have the Russians (and) Belarusians play (at Wimbledon). "There were two options - recommendations, not even laws - given by the UK government. One, to sign a declaration, and be able to play; and the other one to ban them. "Without really any consultation, a unilateral decision was made to ban players. It just goes against what tennis is about. "I have a problem with lack of communication. The player council, player reps on the ATP board, hadn't been consulted until after the decision had been made. "The Russian and Belarusian players weren't even asked if they'd sign the declaration prior to this decision being made. We talk about their safety. They weren't even asked if they could sign it. "And this is where the governance is wrong in tennis, at grand slam level. Because it should be a partnership. "I know COVID's tough but in the last two years, we’ve seen grand slams change the date three times and our world’s best player (Novak Djokovic) locked up in detention for two weeks, horrible scenes to watch whether you’re pro-vaccination or not. "It's tough times, but the buck's got to stop somewhere, where there's a change in governance and consultation where players and tournaments work together. "I just don't see that and I don't see it with this decision." Of the ATP’s decision to ban ranking points from Wimbledon, he said: "We allowed our player reps and tournament reps to make that decision. "Obviously, there were a whole lot of options on the table, but the point is you can’t make unilateral decisions and exclude players. It’s discrimination, right. "Players are being ignored. There's no consultation. There’s frustration (from them) with everything, that they’re being ignored, that points have been removed, frustration that there is discrimination. "We've got to start working together and that's not happening."

Wertheim pocinje svoj uvod u danasnji dan na RG time kako je Novak proteran na SL teren danas, kako je ponovo za njega vezan skandal i kontraverza (zbog toga sto danas igra na SL ) , da ce biti tenzija jer Moncana trenira sad Vajda itd. itd. Ponovio je nekoliko puta reci skandal i kontraverza i jos par prikladnih "epiteta". I posle kao mediji ne kroje "misljenje" javnosti i svi su oh tako fer i super prema NOvaku, a on je tako jedno zlo koje hoda po zemlji...

.

kako PR radi, a ovamo Rafica nema nikakvog uticaja, jadan, na odluku ATP da se ne dodeljuju bodovi na Wimbldonu i zamrznu ni od prosle godine, nego "tamo neki co'ek " sam donosi odluke kako se njemu cefne, a on jadan nema jasno misljenje ni o cemu.

ovde svi jeli bunike! sad ce Wimbldon da tuzi WTA i ATP! sad su ATP i WTA prekrsili govor, a oni, Wimbldon, nisu kad su zabranili Rusima i Belorusima da ucestvuju na turniru! lud zbunjenog....

postavila Barbara pitanje Henmanu i Koreci o ovome, tonom koji je sugerisao da treba da se uputi najostrija kritika igrca i da se poostre kaznjavanja itd. itd., na sta je Henman adekvatno odgovrio. I onda dodje red na Korecu. I covek kaze: znate sta, i u obicnom zivotu smo primetili da je ova pandemija dovela do toga da su ljudi na ivici zivaca, da lako planu za sitnice (npr. ako neko ne krene odmah na semaforu kad se upali zeleno odmah krece s trubljenjem). I teniseri su ljudi, i oni su nervozniji itd. itd. Naravno, ne podrzava ovakvo ponasanje i treba sve adekvatno kazniti, ali da rzume zasto su svi razdrazljiviji nego ranije. Koreca retko razuman i odmeren komentator/analiticar/strucni konsultant u danasnje (tenisko) vreme.

evo je ova opet: sto sad treba posebno da se konsultuju ukrajinski teniseri/teniserke?

Alex de Minaur did not appreciate the wild atmosphere at Lenglen... "Let's say that when the crowd says things to me, with eye contact with me, after I have double faulted... there is a line which must not be crossed." ma nije valjda!

Pliskova: "I think it's super tough and unfair and a bad decision,." "I think they should keep at least 50% from the last year or all the points. It was the same like when it was Covid, if there were no tournaments you kept the points for like one year or two years."

ne mogu da verujem sta citam! danas nije 1. april, je li tako?

Zilavi Zil

Museti mora da stabilizuje svoju igru, trenutno ima previse pikova i ponora 🎢 , kao Shapovalov. Simon pravi shou na SM terenu. covek uziva u svom poslednjem RG.

kad je to Novak rekao da su ga ATP konsultovali? kad su ga prosli put pitali on je rekao da mora da pozove nekog iz PC i da pita o situaciji, pa je pred RG, u petak, pre saopstenja, rekao da on jos nema nikakve informacije o odluci i da ne moze unapred napamet da komentarise. Da bi sinoc rekao da je u medjuvremen (dakle, posle donesene odluke) razgovarao s neimenovanim glavesinama iz ATP i s nekima iz PC (nije rekao s kim). Dakle, to se sve desilo posle donesene odluke. Ne znam sta Enan prividja (kao i Pechi). Novak je cak rekao da je cuo da postoji inicijativa nekih 30tak tenisera da se odluka ponisti, ali ocigledno on ovoga puta ne predvodi "bunu" (posle "solidarnosti" koju je doziveo u januaru od svojih kolega i ne treba uopste da se petlja ni u sta vise - nek si nadju novog vodju).

Museti moze svakog trenutka da se raspadne, nista ne znaci ovo.