Jump to content

(Ne)sportski komentatori


zoe Bg

Recommended Posts

Ubaldo je ladno pitao Šapovalova misli li da bi Beretini mogao da iskoristi onakve prilike kakve je on propuštao danas na brejk lopte i slično. Ne znam šta mu je to trebalo kad je dečko dovoljno utučen, mogao je samo da pita misli li da Beretini može da pobedi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stvarno ne znam kako je u stanju da ostane ozbiljan dok sluša Ubalda, svaka mu čast, pogotovo što je imao juče sa Cvijom napad smeha u emisiji da nisu mogli da se povrate neko vreme :classic_biggrin:

 

Inače Govedarica je čak citirao Dantea juče :lol_2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, de Havilland Mosquito said:

intervuisao je i on Ubalda u blogu. 

Navodno Ubaldo nije mogao da dobije akreditaciju i da su mu pomogli oni sa SK. Kako sam razumeo, stavili su ga na spisak novinara SK. 

 

Ubaldo ga zvao Pliskovic iz zezancije:s_d:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Članci na B92 postaju sve gori, očigledno ih niko ni ne pročita pre postavljanja i samo je bitno štancovati što više klikova. Da ne pominjem naslove za onu drugu temu, ali mogli bi se potruditi oko teksta da i kad prevode to ima nekog elementarnog smisla.

 

Quote

Zbog činjenica da je najbolji u pet setova otvara razliku u odnosu na igrače poput Medvedeva ili Zvereva, koji su takođe pokazali da mogu jako dobro da igraju, posebno na ovim vrstama turnira", počeo je Koreča za "Punto de Break".

Kako neko ko ne prati redovno tenis da dešifruje uopšte ovakvu rečenicu?

I oni koji prate moraju da se oslone na poznavanje konteksta pošto ovo ni gramatički ni semantički ne znači ništa.

 

Prestala sam da čitam i njihov teniski deo otkako Ozmo više ne piše, sad sam počela opet da gledam ovaj deo za OI i zbog interesantnih članaka o drugim sportovima, ali i to je jako loše sastavljeno i prevedeno. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

evo ga i ovaj Britanac (to je onaj koji je u drugom podcastu pricao o tome kako bivse komunisticke zemlje mnogo vise vrednuju OI od Zapada, cak je napisao i esej o tome, o politici i OI  :twak:  inace, svojevremeno je bio u grupi UK&USA novinara koji su bojkotovali Novaka tokom mastersa u Rimu, umesto njegovih meceva s Delpom i Schwartzmanom (koji su bili fantasticni) oni su gledali Pasmu Evrovizije :twak:   )  :

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.tennismajors.com/others-news/tokyo-olympics/why-the-olympics-means-so-much-to-some-434610.html


 

Quote

 

Why the Olympics means so much, to some

 

At the height of the Cold War, Communist countries used sport to create status. It’s a link that remains strong for tennis players today

 

 

Quote

But a closer look at the medalists since 1988 will also show how well players from Eastern Europe have performed. In total, 13 players from former Communist countries in Eastern Europe earned a place on the singles podium, while Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Dementieva both won the singles gold.

The reason for that has a lot to do with history and politics.

At the height of the Cold War, when Communist countries were looking for ways to outdo their western counterparts, sport became an important tool, a sign of status. Producing champions, from athletics to swimming, gymnastics to winter sports, was government policy.

 

Quote

Realising that the Olympics was effectively a shop window to showcase their assumed superiority, eastern European countries invested hugely in Olympic sports, and by turn, in Olympic athletes. Winning a medal at the Olympics was a big deal and could mean a big deal too. Winners were often given huge rewards, by means of cars, even apartments. The incentive to do well was clear.

Of course, that national drive for success also saw many eastern European countries turn to the pharmaceutical industry for help, drugs in sport became more and more prevalent as they tried to outperform the United States.

 

e sad nek mi neko objasni kako su to Ameri prirodno superiorniji u sportu od "bivsih komunista" (cak ni ne ulazuci ni malo novca u olimpijske sportove, jelte, za razliku od mrskih "komunjara"). Da li je to u genetici ili u politickom sistemu ili o cemu se to tacno radi? Kako je to totalno prirodno da su Ameri najbolji na OI, a ovi "komunisti", koji umisljaju da su superiorni, sad tu kao hoce da zeznu "dobre momke" Amere (i njihove najbolje prijatelje Britance) raznoraznim necastivim metodama (koje su, kao sto dobro znamo, totalno nepoznate naivnim Amerima :classic_rolleyes:  )

 

kakva ksenofobija! :twak:

 

i onda krece da citira razne tenisere/teniserke iz tzv. Istocne Evrope, da bi na kraju napisao ovo:

 

Quote

It is not just the former Communist countries who hold the Olympics up as a beacon. The traditional Olympic countries – Greece (the original hosts), Great Britain, France, Germany, Australia and the United States (tennis-aside) all invest heavily in Olympic sports.

 

dakle: zemlje se dele na "tradicionalno olimpijske zemlje" koje u duhu olimpizma ucestvuju na OI (good guys) i ex-komunjarske ciji motivi uopste nisu ovako fini i lepi (bad guys, sto rece onaj producent ESPN-a kad je postavio Novaku pitanje tokom Wimbldona), koje perfidnim metodama (cak i patriotizmom) hoce da podriju dobre momke iz "tradicionalnih olimpijskih zemalja" i pokazu kako su zapravo oni superiorni!

 

kakva gomila smeca!

Edited by wwww
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...