mrd Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, Baby said: I niko nije moj, ne znam sto mi ista stavljas u posed? Mene briga ko ce da vodi drzavu dok je normalan, da li su dems ili reps, ne interesuje me, samo da ode Tramp (koji eto, po sistemu Vucica iskace iz frizidera poslednje tri i po godine i koji je nazalost zagadio republikance kojima je sada kao kamen oko vrata). Ignore me! Trump je na zalost izvukao ono najgore kod demokrata, zgadio ih je svima koji iole razmisljaju o akciji i reakciji. Dokazao da su ovi sadasnji dems 0 (nule) diplomatije i bilo koje razumne debate. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 3 minutes ago, Gaga said: Jedno pitanje. Hoce li Bajden i Tramp imati debatu, 1 on 1? Valjda hoce, od 29 septembra... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squabbit Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Ne rekoh tvoj. Mislim napisah tvoj i za jedne i za druge. Nije bilo bukvalno. :) Samo tebi miliji. Nismo se razumeli. Vrv se ne razumemo, al nije greda. Samo da ostane da batinanje u US i Srb nije ni blizu isto. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk Jedno pitanje. Hoce li Bajden i Tramp imati debatu, 1 on 1? Hahahajja hoce hoce.Biden nije drzao govor duzi od 8min vec 2 godine. :) Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrd Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Squabbit said: Hahahajja hoce hoce. Biden nije drzao govor duzi od 8min vec 2 godine. 🙂 Samo da mu napisu notes, sta je jeo pre 15min. 🙂 Ima da kaze, ja sam crn, glasajte za mene, a Trump ce da mu kaze:"Jel?" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, mrd said: Mene buni samo cinjenica da ljudi koji su preziveli 9-mart, Tiananmen, sebi dozvoljavaju luksuz, da u ovako brutalnim protestima vide mirne demonstracije. Mene vise nista ne iznenadjuje kad ljudi gutaju retoriku medija. 5 minutes ago, Gaga said: Jedno pitanje. Hoce li Bajden i Tramp imati debatu, 1 on 1? Ako pitas Dems, no way, Tramp jedva ceka.... U svakom slucaju ako se dogovore, ima da bude najbolji show na TVu ikad napravljen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrd Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Just now, Angelia said: U svakom slucaju ako se dogovore, ima da bude najbolji show na TVu ikad napravljen. To treba snimiti i cuvati kao skolski primer demokratije i dokaz da svako moze da prica. 🙂 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaga Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Ako bude,cestitke Trampi na novom mandatu. Cekaj,zar to nije obavezno kod izbora,da obojica kandidata imaju debatu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrd Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, Gaga said: Ako bude,cestitke Trampi na novom mandatu. Cekaj,zar to nije obavezno kod izbora,da obojica kandidata imaju debatu? Quote Gde bre Biden je zaboravio kako da piski. 🙂 Quote Candidate debates are not constitutionally mandated, but they are now considered an intrinsic part of the election process. ... Presidential debates are held late in the election cycle, after the political parties have nominated their candidates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amigo Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 (edited) Entuzijazam globalizma je izgleda zavrsen. Free enterprise je prakticno mrtav. Tarife, carine, pritisci na kompanije sa kim da posluju, pritisci na drzave sa kim da trguju, drzava se sve vise petlja u biznis, odredjuje pravce, sa kim, kako i gdje, jos malo doci cemo do americke prve petoletke Politicki nemiri, rasni nemiri, fake news, korona itd ucinili su da ovakva bude percepcija USA iz ovog mog dominiona. Edited July 22, 2020 by Amigo 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 Ah super, saobracajci ce da se bore protiv kriminala, nakon sto su rasformirali jedinicu koja je specijalizovala borbu protiv nasilnog kriminala. Odlicna ideja: The NYPD has cut traffic and homeless units to focus on rising gun violence following mayor Bill DeBlasio's move to defund police, according to reports. Senior police leadership transferred 114 members of the traffic congestion mitigation and 85 members of the homeless outreach units, according to official documents seen by The New York Post. The 199 officers were reassigned to precincts to combat a recent spike in shootings across the city, an NYPD spokesperson told the Post. Ali barem su ocistili BLM protest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Gaga said: Ako bude,cestitke Trampi na novom mandatu. Cekaj,zar to nije obavezno kod izbora,da obojica kandidata imaju debatu? Pa sad... Bajden moze i da cuti i gleda kako Tramp prica, jer svako slovo koje izgovori uglavnom se sve dublje ukopava... bar do sada je tako bilo. Tramp nema nikakav plan za dalje osim da nastavi da pravi Ameriku jos vecom. Moze da nastavi da drvi o imigrantima, zidu, fenomenalnoj ekonomiji berzi... i naravno krivcu Kini. Svakako je vec vecina zauzela stav koji se nece mnogo promeniti debatom. Oni za Trampa ce biti za njega po svaku cenu, ovi koji nisu nece biti i glasace protiv, ne za... Bajden se samo tu nasao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrd Posted July 22, 2020 Share Posted July 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, Baby said: Bajden se samo tu nasao. Biden jednostavno ne zna ni gde se nasao. Trump hoce da napravi MAGA, a biden misli da je crn. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deez nuts. Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 Williamsport, PAVery fine people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djole Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 18 hours ago, Squabbit said: Jao gde njega stavljas ovde. Okacio video iz BG iako je znao da nije US i ostavio.. Zato sinoc Serbia trendinguje u US. Bas sarlatan i biased lik. Attntion whorchica I Morgan Freeman okačio. Al' dobro, kad je Đovak bio zauzet Pjerovim prolivom, bar ovako da se pročuje šta se dešava. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anunnaki Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 38 minutes ago, Sprivel said: Williamsport, PA Very fine people. da li je to tvoje misljenje oo vim looserima? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squabbit Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 I Morgan Freeman okačio. Al' dobro, kad je Đovak bio zauzet Pjerovim prolivom, bar ovako da se pročuje šta se dešava. Nije to taj morgan :)Bar ja mislim Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djole Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 43 minutes ago, Squabbit said: Nije to taj morgan 🙂 Bar ja mislim Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk hahahahha postaje sve bolje 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, djole said: hahahahha postaje sve bolje A vidi ovo kako tek razvaljuje ovu pripremu za debatu 😄 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 Nisam sigurna da li je smesno ili tuzno: 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrd Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 Klinci mi pokazali danas, kazu cale vidi ovo reklama pd-a koji je nabavio moskvicha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 Nacionalni Muzej AA istorije je bio postavio ovo: Pa su ljudi morali da im ukazu da je ovo izuzetno rasisticki poster....onda su ga uklonili. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrd Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 Nacionalni Muzej AA istorije je bio postavio ovo: Pa su ljudi morali da im ukazu da je ovo izuzetno rasisticki poster....onda su ga uklonili. Iz svega prezentiranog, AA, sad idu na clear chocolate i ultimacy of b. peopleSent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, mrd said: Iz svega prezentiranog, AA, sad idu na clear chocolate i ultimacy of b. people Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk Ne znam sta su planirali da kazu, ali znam sta su rekli, a to nije nimalo flattering za AA zajednicu (i sve one non-white). Kako god okrenes, poster kao da je pisao KKK. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bohumilo Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Angelia said: Nisam sigurna da li je smesno ili tuzno: Pa u prvom redu je genijalno, jer su za manje od 2 minuta "busnuli dusicu" ovih postmodernih "identitetskih" - u sustini duboko anti-liberalnih i anti-prosvetiteljskih - pokreta i ideologija. A i ovaj flajer ispod je takodje odlican primer bas u kontekstu narecenog videa: 1 hour ago, Angelia said: Nacionalni Muzej AA istorije je bio postavio ovo: ...jer ideja da su neke individualne i kulturalne karakteristike, kao sto je "individualizam", "objektivnost", naucni racionalizam***, radna etika, samostalnosti, organizovanost i slicno - koje su, bez dileme, prediktori pozitivnih licnih i drustvenih ishoda - utkane u rasu i boju koze je stav koji bi svaki belacki suprematista najsnaznije podrzao. Recju, samo zamenite autora i bukvalno isti flajer za ideolosku naobrazbu moze da se deli i guta na skupu neke white power grupe. ------------------------------------------ *** btw, borba protiv objektivnosti i naucnog racionalizma karakterise svaki totalitarni pokret, pa tako i ovaj woke-zombi totalitarizam; nedavno je Lorens Kraus imao fin pregledni clanak o probudjenom staljinizmu/lisenkoizmu cak i u najbazicnijim prirodnim naukama: The Ideological Corruption of Science https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-ideological-corruption-of-science-11594572501 pocetak: Quote In the 1980s, when I was a young professor of physics and astronomy at Yale, deconstructionism was in vogue in the English Department. We in the science departments would scoff at the lack of objective intellectual standards in the humanities, epitomized by a movement that argued against the existence of objective truth itself, arguing that all such claims to knowledge were tainted by ideological biases due to race, sex or economic dominance. It could never happen in the hard sciences, except perhaps under dictatorships, such as the Nazi condemnation of “Jewish” science, or the Stalinist campaign against genetics led by Trofim Lysenko, in which literally thousands of mainstream geneticists were dismissed in the effort to suppress any opposition to the prevailing political view of the state. Or so we thought. In recent years, and especially since the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, academic science leaders have adopted wholesale the language of dominance and oppression previously restricted to “cultural studies” journals to guide their disciplines, to censor dissenting views, to remove faculty from leadership positions if their research is claimed by opponents to support systemic oppression... ... i zakljucak, nakon pregleda sta se desava: Quote ... Whenever science has been corrupted by falling prey to ideology, scientific progress suffers. This was the case in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union—and in the U.S. in the 19th century when racist views dominated biology, and during the McCarthy era, when prominent scientists like Robert Oppenheimer were ostracized for their political views. To stem the slide, scientific leaders, scientific societies and senior academic administrators must publicly stand up not only for free speech in science, but for quality, independent of political doctrine and divorced from the demands of political factions. uz, naravno, sjajnu ilustraciju: Dobar primer zrtvovanja racionalnosti na oltar totalitarne ideologije je i zabrana lekarima da ispituje Covid pozitivne pacijente da li su bili na protestima: https://www.nationalreview.com/news/de-blasio-tells-covid-contract-tracers-not-to-ask-positive-cases-if-theyve-attended-blm-protests/ Edited July 23, 2020 by bohumilo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angelia Posted July 23, 2020 Share Posted July 23, 2020 56 minutes ago, bohumilo said: *** btw, borba protiv objektivnosti i naucnog racionalizma karakterise svaki totalitarni pokret, pa tako i ovaj woke-zombi totalitarizam; nedavno je Lorens Kraus imao fin pregledni clanak o probudjenom staljinizmu/lisenkoizmu cak i u najbazicnijim prirodnim naukama: The Ideological Corruption of Science https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-ideological-corruption-of-science-11594572501 pocetak: i zakljucak, nakon pregleda sta se desava: Ne znam da li si video ovo: Scholar forced to resign over study that found police shootings not biased against blacks .... But the main thrust to oust Hsu came because the professor touted Michigan State research that found police are not more likely to shoot African-Americans. “The victory of the Twitter mob will likely have a chilling effect on academic freedom on campus,” Hsu told The College Fix via email. The union had taken advantage of a Black Lives Matter-linked #ShutDownStem day on June 10 to help oust him. Hsu stepped down from his vice president role on June 19 after pressure from the union and the president of the university, Samuel Stanley. Hsu will stay on as a physics professor at Michigan State, however. .... “We found that the race of the officer doesn’t matter when it comes to predicting whether black or white citizens are shot,” according to the Michigan State-based research Hsu had quoted that drew the ire of many. Hsu said that the attacks against him are baseless. “The GEU alleged that I am a racist because I interviewed MSU Psychology professor Joe Cesario, who studies police shootings,” he wrote in an email to The College Fix. “But Cesario’s work (along with similar work by others, such as Roland Fryer at Harvard) is essential to understanding deadly force and how to improve policing.” Cesario is the Michigan State psychology professor who co-authored the study published July 2019 that debunked the notion that police are more likely to shoot African-Americans. Hsu wrote on his blog that the paper concluded “there is no widespread racial bias in police shooting.” Professor Cesario received a small amount of funding for his research under Hsu’s leadership. Cesario pointed out to The Wall Street Journal “we had no idea what the data was going to be, what the outcome was going to be, before we did this study.” Cesario’s research had been cited in a widely shared Wall Street Journal op-ed headlined “The Myth of Systemic Police Racism” that was published June 3 amid racially charged protests against the death of George Floyd in police custody. ..... The graduate union told The Fix that administrators should not share research that runs counter to public statements by the university. “It is the union’s position that an administrator sharing such views is in opposition to MSU’s statements released supporting the protests and their root cause and aim,” Ackles wrote in an e-mail to The College Fix. Znaci nemoj slucajno da se bavis temom oko koje smo se dogovorili sta je prica, cak i kad podaci ne podrzavaju nasu retoriku. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now