-
Posts
12,937 -
Joined
-
Days Won
25
Everything posted by wwww
-
Shapovalov totalno zasluzeno imao malo nekih brljotinica (duple), ali sve u svemu sasvim dobra predstava. Zverev ocajan, servis katastrofa (ceo turnir), a ni ostatak igre nije bas bio mnogo bolji.
-
Zverev - totalni raspad. DF sipa samo tako, a ni ostatak igre mu nije mnogo bolji (izgleda da mu je mozak prokljucao na vrucini, plus pritisak toga da moze da postane #1 ako osvoji titulu). Nadal posle tesnog TB 1. seta rutinirao Manarina. Box mu je krcat, otac mu je tu (zar ne bese da igraci mogu da povedu s sobom samo 3 clana tima?) sad i Shapo pripomaze...
-
Stach i Beker komentarisu mec Zverev-Shapo, pa u jednom trenutku kaze Stach (parafraziram): Dzoker je posle pobede nad Shapovalovim na WImbldonu u svlacionici prisao Shapovalovu i tesio ga, rekao mu da zna kako je njemu tesko, ali da njegovo vreme dolazi... pa nastavlja: bas fino od Dzokera (obicno ga tako oslovljava, kao da su zajedno ovce cuvali), fer je i to reci. u stilu: da ipak napomenemo da "Dzoker" nije bas totalno, 100%, najcrni djavo. covek se izvinjava sto, eto, mora da kaze i nesto pozitivno o "Dzokeru". Stach sad nalazi utehu u (sad vec prakticno neminovnom) porazu u tome da je Zverev veoma popularan u Australiji. , kako su njegovi treninzi bili krcati... Sad se nada da ce se Shapo uplasiti od velicine (ne fizicke, nego igracke) Zvereva, od njegove aure... A bilo je interesantno i kako su komentarisali kad je Zverev razlupao reket da "ni dugmici nisu ostali": nikakva kritika, samo podrska d izbaci iz sebe frustraciju i bes. Kako je sve relativno i zavisi s koje pozicije nesto posmatras - iste stvari se dijametralno suprotno komentarisu. komentar na 5:2 u 3. setu: "devojka-Svedjanka se veoma raduje" (razvojem dogadjaja)
-
There’s been a lot written about Omicron’s sharp case descent, which was seen in Gauging and throughout South Africa. But it isn’t so evident in any other country to date. It actually is somewhat wobbly, stuttering in the United Kingdom, one of the first countries outside of South Africa to begin its descent. So Omicron’s future trajectory isn’t clear, and we cannot rule out 2nd surges of Omicron at this point in places around the world. That occurrence may be influenced, at least in part, by the immunity wall built prior to and during the Omicron wave (from prior Covid, vaccinations and boosters), and only time will tell. Now is not the time to rely on sharp descents and that somehow “it’s over". If that happens, and we quickly get to containment and low levels of circulating virus that are no more threatening than annual flu, terrific. It seems quite unlikely with so much of the world’s population, especially in low and middle income countries, have yet to be vaccinated. If there's one thing we learned about predicting the path of SARS-CoV-2, it’s that it’s unpredictable. So we shouldn’t plan on a rosy picture. There’s too much we can do right now to seize control in case the most optimistic scenarios don’t play out.
-
with a booster vs Delta, the vaccine effectiveness was restored to ~95% hospitalizations: It is quite clear in reviewing the patterns from some of countries hit hard by Omicron that vaccination and booster rates are playing a critical role in keeping severe disease in check. One example is Portugal, with 90% 2-shot vaccinated and over 40% boosted. New cases have gotten extremely high during its Omicron wave, but the impact for ICU admits or deaths, fortunately, has been small to date. Similar patterns, perhaps less pronounced with respect to the case vs ICU/deaths dissociation, are evident in Denmark, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, all going through Omicron waves.
-
citala sam ovakvu argumentaciju: ako je neko nevakcinisan i nikada nije bio zarazen nekim od prethodnih sojeva, on ce posle inficiranja s omikronom zapravo biti imun na taj soj (i "naslednice") virusa, ali recimo nece na sojeve koji budu evoluirali od delte. onaj ko je stekao imunitet ili vakcinacijom (koja je bazirana na originalnom soju, a pokriva i alfu, betu i deltu) ili nekim prethodnim sojem imace neki imunitet koji ga stiti i od omikrona kad se zarazi omikronom, pa ce rezultujuci imunitet biti sireg spektra, tj. postojace imunitet na buduce sojeve koji se razviju i iz delte i iz omikrona. zato se preporucuje da se nevakcinisani koji su se zarazili samo omikronom ipak vakcinisu, jer ce da prosire spektar imuniteta koji su dobili posle zarazavanja omikronom.
-
pa vidjen je (neka fotografija) 29.12. negde napolju, a bio je na klupi Kanade 2.1. i igrao dubl.
-
ne znamo kad tacno je Shapovalov leteo za Australiju, recimo da je 23.12. poleteo, 24.12. sleteo i testirao se, a 25.12. dobio + rezultat. znaci da je npr. najkasnije 22.12. morao da ima negativan test da bi usao u avion. Problem je u tome sto je on bio u bliskom kontaktu s nekim ko je potom bio pozitivan (pozdravili su se na mrezi) i sto je trebalo da odradi neku izolaciju da se vidi da li se tad zarazio, da ceka da prodje inkubacioni period (recimo 7 dana, ne znam koja su sad gde pravila). Po istom principu kao i Novak posle utakmice i + testa onog igraca s kojim se Novak pozdravio. No, za sportiste vaze drugacija pravila (valjda). Pa tako za Shapovalova vazi isto sto i za Novaka: kritika ili opravdavanje. Ono sto je cudno su sad pravila u Australiji, gde je on sad + na testu, a ne radi nikakvu izolaciju (za razliku od nemackog novinara, takodje vakcinisanog i mislim busterovanog, kao i Mishe Zvereva koji je posle + testa bio 7 dana u izolaciji u istom tom SIdneju, gde je i Denis sleteo). Koja su zapravo pravila u Australiji?!?!? Bog sveti zna! Ni australijska vlast nema pojma. ex-Kralj je mogao da dobije odmah medikamente (npr. onaj Fajzerov koji ima odlicnu efikasnost u ranim fazama, plus monoklonalna antitela ili kako se vec zove) cim je saznao da je Nadal +.
-
ne znam da li se secas: - na nekoj od milion strana na "onoj" temi sam rekla da prvo sto mi je palo na pamet kad sam videla snimke sa utakmice je bilo: ala ce ovde da bude zarazenih! - rekla sam da bih ja (da sam kojim slucajem bila na takvom iventu) se samoizolovala dok ne vidim da li sam zarazena. no, to uopste nije praksa ni ovde kod mene, a kamo li u Srbiji. - kad se vec culo da je neko bio pozitivan, Novak je trebalo da se, kao blizak kontakt, testira i izoluje. No, to nije praksa kod sportista (osim ako imaju simptome) kako sam shvatila. A tek u Srbiji... - no, bar je odmah uradio pcr test i antigenski. antigenski (ako ispravno radi) u principu pokazuje da li je neko zarazan, pcr ima mnogo nizi prag osetljivosti te hvata i ljude koji jos nisu postali zarazni. To je ono o cemu je i Rubljov pricao kad se pravdao oko svog pozitivnog testa (pcr test mu jeste bio pozitivan, ali je imao malu kolicinu virusa, znaci na antigenskom bi bio negativan, te je bio nezarazan - to mu je neko rekao, nije on sam dosao do ovog zakljucka - no formalno je (rules are rules) bio pozitivan). Nadal je pre meca s Shapovalovim uradio pcr test (verovatno ujutro) i taj test mu je bio negativan (treba nekoliko sati, min 3h, da se test odradi) i s tim testom je usao u avion. Problem je sto je on u medjuvremenu osetio simptome i po pravilu bi trebalo da zbog toga ponovi test. U ovom prevodu ne stoji eksplicitno kakve simptome je imao (pitanje je koliko je precizan prevod s spanskog na engleski - "I started feeling under the weather"), ali nesto je imao cim je sam primetio simptome i mislio da je grip.
-
pa kad su se dlake cerecile za Novaka zasto ne bi za Rafu, Denisa, Rubljova? ako se Novaku zameralo zasto se nije momentalno izlovao posle saznanja da je kosarkas Barselone pozitivan, valjda moze i Denisu zasto se nije izolovao kad je Nadal objavio da je pozitivan, vec je leteo za Australiju, pa tamo bio pozitivan (prvi test po sletanju), pa ni tada nije bio u izolaciji vec posle par dana bio na terenu i potom igao dubl. U medjuvremenu nemacki novinar je pre nekih 7 dana bio pozitivan u Australiji i covek u izolaciji u sobi. Takodje, Novak je imao negativni antigenski test uzet istovremeno kao i pcr test, pa mu se ipak zameralo sto nije u izolacji cekao rezultate pcr testa (iako nije imao nikakve simptome, za razliku od Nadala). Ne znam kako su Nadala pustili u avion ako je imao simptome. Koliko ja znam avio kompanije ne pustaju ljude s simptomima respiratornih bolesti, ne mogu oni sad da gataju da li je to grip ili covid. Nadal eksplicitno kaze da je posle meca s Shapovalovim osetio simptome, ali nije mislio da je covid (i nije mu palo na pamet da se ponovo testira, vec je seo u avion). Cak ni kad mu je toliko pozlilo u avionu da je odmah s aerodroma otisao u bolnicu on je mislio da je obican grip. Ali ipak nije hteo da izlaze riziku starije u familiji. interesantan je i deo gde kaze da je prva 4 dan bio mrtvosan (d ane nabrajam simptome) - znaci od 20.-23.12. naredan 3 dan aje bio vrlo umoran. 24.-26.12. 8. dana je vec krenuo da vozi sobni bicikl pola sada i radi lagane vezbice - 27.12. - covek je supermen onda je dobio negativan test- za pretpostaviti je 28.12. - pa je jedan dan trenirao u Spaniji - valjda tog 28.12. - i resio da krene za Australiju. znamo da je bio na RL 31.12., znaci krenuo je najkasnije 30.12. ako je verovati njegovoj prici (na isti nacin kako se sumnja u Novakovu pricu ), nije samo Novak Spartacus of Nazareth
-
so he says the PCR was negative but he felt so bad during the flight that he went straight to hospital when he got to Spain Why would he fly? Why would he risk it? And expose to all the other people on plane? He feels so rough on flight from Abu Dhabi to Spain but has a negative PCR. A few hours later in Spain, he goes straight to hospital as he thinks he has flu (who goes hospital for flu?) And then tests positive… * Rafa & Shapo play in Abu Dhabi on Dec 18. * Rafa tests positive on Dec 20. * Shapo tests positive on Dec 25 on arrival in Sydney. Looks like he got infected by Nadal. Why did he not isolate after Nadal announced he was Covid positive? Instead, he flew to Sydney and confirmed he was Covid positive Is still allowed in and hasn't quarantined? * 29 Dec someone takes a photo of him. (not isolating?) * On court Jan 2 in ATP doubles pravil, pravila...
-
Women's Singles R16 [1] Barty vs. Anisimova [5] Sakkari vs. [21] Pegula [4] Krejcikova vs. [24] Azarenka [8] Badosa vs. Keys [19] Mertens vs. [27] Collins [14] Halep vs. Cornet [7] Swiatek vs. Cirstea [2] Sabalenka vs. Kanepi Men's Singles R16 [17] Monfils vs. Kecmanovic [19] Carreno vs. [7] Berrettini [3] Zverev vs. [14] Shapovalov Mannarino vs. [6] Nadal [32] De Minaur vs. [11] Sinner [20] Fritz vs. [4] Tsitsipas [9] Auger-Aliassime vs. [27] Cilic Cressy vs. [2] Medvedev
-
Along with Fritz and Tsitsipas, Aryna Sabalenka is another player being followed by the Netflix filming crew at this #AusOpen
-
znaci kao i kod nas: 2G je za one koji su vakcinisani ili prelezali 3G je za vakcinisane, prelezale ili koji imaju negativni pcr test. to je sasvim druga stvar od onog sto sam ja prethodno bila razumela, naime da se vise ne priznaje imunitet onima koji su prelezali zarazu, tj. da vazi samo 1G (samo vakcinisani) ako se ne varam PHH je rekao da je i on sad negde zakacio virus, sto bi onda znacilo da bi i on mogao da igra RG (spada u 2G), dok Sandgren npr. ne moze jer je on imao infekciju pre vise od godinu dana (no ako se u medjuvremenu inficira onda bi i on mogao). za ulazak u USA ostaje 1G (samo vakcinisani). naravno, ostaje opcija da ATP uvede obaveznu vakcinaciju svih igraca da bi igrali turnire, mada je Azarenka pre neki dan (doduse za WTA, ali isto je to) rekla da ne bi mogli da uvedu obaveznu vakcinaciju (sigurno bi ih onda mogli tuziti zbog prakticno zabrane bavljenja poslom, posto ATP/WTA imaju monopol, tj. nema laternative za profi tenisere).
-
Krajicek opens the Ahoy door for Djokovic: ‘He has not broken any rules, so he is welcome’ ABN Amro tennis tournamentRichard Krajicek had visible difficulties with it last year, an empty Ahoy. But the Rotterdam tennis tournament had no choice but to keep the doors closed this year, the director explained today. Krajicek also opened the door for Novak Djokovic, who was eventually refused entry in Australia. Djokovic also participated in 2010 in Ahoy. There has been no contact with Novak Djokovic in recent days, the message remains that the Serb is always welcome and knows that. Krajicek: ,,Normally he goes skiing in February, to recover from the Australian Open. Now he may have to recover from that tournament. But we follow the rules of the Dutch government here, Djokovic has not broken any rules, so he is welcome. I also try not to have an opinion about it, everyone is free not to be vaccinated.”
-
https://netherlandsnewslive.com/krajicek-opens-the-ahoy-door-for-djokovic-he-has-not-broken-any-rules-so-he-is-welcome-sport/336993/ Krajicek opens the Ahoy door for Djokovic: ‘He has not broken any rules, so he is welcome’ ABN Amro tennis tournamentRichard Krajicek had visible difficulties with it last year, an empty Ahoy. But the Rotterdam tennis tournament had no choice but to keep the doors closed this year, the director explained today. Krajicek also opened the door for Novak Djokovic, who was eventually refused entry in Australia. Once but never again. That’s what tournament director Richard Krajicek said last year about the edition of the ABN Amro tennis tournament in an empty Ahoy. But the stands in Rotterdam will also remain empty next month, it was announced last week. That decision seems a bit hasty. The current measures taken by the cabinet are about to expire, further relaxation may follow, for example also under pressure from the culture and events sector. “At some point we have to make a decision,” Krajicek explained. ,,If we want to get rid of a kind of television studio again, by illuminating it nicely, we have to prepare. At Friends of Amstel Live they built everything up, and they had to tear everything down a day in advance. For us this was the only choice. Hopefully it will be twice and then never again.” Because there is no audience, the tournament uses a halved prize pool, just like last year, according to the guidelines of the ATP. ,,And just like last year, I will only wear a suit on the final day,’ said Krajicek. ,,But I do intend to come into the room a little more to watch the matches.” The tournament director found that difficult last year, he was mainly in his office. Furthermore, Krajicek announced that the Dutch Botic van de Zandschulp and Tallon groenpoor will receive a wildcard for the main tournament as expected. The former may not need it, in which case the free ticket will be released again. Eleven players from the top twenty participate in Rotterdam, including number 2 in the world Daniil Medvedev and two-time winner Gael Monfils. In the wheelchair tournament, the line-up is stronger than ever, with nine players from the global top ten. Djokovic also participated in 2010 in Ahoy. There has been no contact with Novak Djokovic in recent days, the message remains that the Serb is always welcome and knows that. Krajicek: ,,Normally he goes skiing in February, to recover from the Australian Open. Now he may have to recover from that tournament. But we follow the rules of the Dutch government here, Djokovic has not broken any rules, so he is welcome. I also try not to have an opinion about it, everyone is free not to be vaccinated.” This morning it was announced that main sponsor ABN Amro will also remain associated with the ATP tournament for the next three years, so until 2025. This means that the bank remains the longest-serving title sponsor of the ATP Tour. In addition, tournament directors Krajicek and Esther Vergeer will remain associated with the event. The fiftieth edition is scheduled for next year.
-
https://nos.nl/artikel/2413731-krajicek-hoopt-djokovic-naar-rotterdam-te-halen-fantastisch-als-hij-komt Krajicek hopes to bring Djokovic to Rotterdam: 'Fantastic when he comes' Novak Djokovic is not on the list of participants of the ABN Amro tennis tournament in Rotterdam, which starts on February 7. But if it is up to tournament director Richard Krajicek, the Serbian number one in the world will participate next month. That is striking, since Djokovic was refused entry to Australia because he was not vaccinated against corona. Different rules apply in the Netherlands. "The Dutch government allows him to come, we follow those guidelines. It's just allowed. The situation in Australia is completely different," said Krajicek. Extra call? He will not make an extra call to the Serb. "No, I don't know if this is the right time. He has something else on his mind. Moreover, he knows that he can come here. Great if he wants to come." Djokovic traveled to Australia early this year to defend his title at the Australian Open. He would have surpassed Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer with a 21st Grand Slam title. However, his visa application failed. As he is not competing in the Australian Open, there is a gap in his match schedule that Krajicek could take advantage of. The Serb has only participated in the ATP tournament in Rotterdam three times before, most recently in 2010.
-
https://www.science.org/content/article/missed-shots-science-revisits-its-2020-breakthrough-year Missed shots: Science revisits its 2020 Breakthrough of the Year The COVID-19 vaccine rollout was a spectacular success—and a stunning tragedy
-
za obozavaoce - Sorana prosla u R4: