Angelia Posted yesterday at 12:08 AM Posted yesterday at 12:08 AM 22 minutes ago, 𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 said: Ne, ja sigurno nisam mizogin, ali tvoj narandzasti ljubimac jeste i uopste ne gubi priliku da to uvek pokaze. Meni bi bilo logicno da se ne raspravljamo oko ovog, ali avaj... Pa I meni bi bilo logicno da se ne raspravljamo o ovome. Ali ti si pretvorila to u mizogeniju, kad je jasno da javnost smatra da je zlatna medalja muskog tima, vece dostignuce, jer su imali losiju poziciju godinama. To sto se zenski tim uvredio na kako je on to rekao, samo zato sto su uvredjene, ne znaci da su u pravu. Ali njihovo pravo da izaberu da ne idu. Iskreno receno kad sam razmislila o tvojoj hipotetickoj situaciji, mozda bi I dosla na tvoj rodjendan, cisto da te nerviram. Samo kazem, ne vidim nista mizogeno u tome. I kad se neko zeza na racun "zena vozaca" ne zakljucujem da su automatski to mizogena misljenja. Thin skin nije moj fazon. A videla sam stvarnu mizogeniju u zivotu. Preosetljivi ste na gluposti. Vise ne mozes ni da se nasmejes na salu, a da ne dobijes etiketu.
𝓑𝓪𝓫𝔂 Posted yesterday at 03:05 AM Posted yesterday at 03:05 AM 2 hours ago, Angelia said: Pa I meni bi bilo logicno da se ne raspravljamo o ovome. Ali ti si pretvorila to u mizogeniju, kad je jasno da javnost smatra da je zlatna medalja muskog tima, vece dostignuce, jer su imali losiju poziciju godinama. To sto se zenski tim uvredio na kako je on to rekao, samo zato sto su uvredjene, ne znaci da su u pravu. Ali njihovo pravo da izaberu da ne idu. Iskreno receno kad sam razmislila o tvojoj hipotetickoj situaciji, mozda bi I dosla na tvoj rodjendan, cisto da te nerviram. Samo kazem, ne vidim nista mizogeno u tome. I kad se neko zeza na racun "zena vozaca" ne zakljucujem da su automatski to mizogena misljenja. Thin skin nije moj fazon. A videla sam stvarnu mizogeniju u zivotu. Preosetljivi ste na gluposti. Vise ne mozes ni da se nasmejes na salu, a da ne dobijes etiketu. Ne bro, ti si pretvorila kao i do sada sve u raspravu. Jbg jedina se ti ovde ne slazes... 2
Mina D. Harker Posted yesterday at 10:05 AM Posted yesterday at 10:05 AM Bez uvrede Anđeliji, ali iz ukupnog pisanja ne bih rekla da ima radar za mizoginiju. Kežualnu, ličnu ili sistemsku.
DameTime Posted yesterday at 10:24 AM Posted yesterday at 10:24 AM Quote United States Olympic women's hockey team captain Hillary Knight didn't find Trump's "joke" about including the gold-winning U.S. women's hockey team to the White House funny. At all. Less laughing off misogyny and more calling misogyny like it is: Bullshit. Distasteful. Unacceptable. Not a f*cking joke. Knight, a five-time Olympic medalist, said the controversy surrounding Trump's invite "is overshadowing a lot of the success, the success of just women at the Olympics carrying for Team USA and having amazing gold-medal feats." 👏👏👏 2
Angelia Posted yesterday at 12:04 PM Posted yesterday at 12:04 PM 1 hour ago, Mina D. Harker said: Bez uvrede Anđeliji, ali iz ukupnog pisanja ne bih rekla da ima radar za mizoginiju. Kežualnu, ličnu ili sistemsku. Totalno bez uvrede, zar nisam I sama rekla da mislim da ste preosetljivi? To upravo znaci da nemam "radar" jer to zahteva da u svakom casual obracanju ili sali trazim mizogeniju, I jos licnu ili sistemsku. Nije svaka glupa recenica mizogenija, zato sto sam zena. Jasno mi je da u Srbiji imate veci problem, ali projektujete. Videla sam stvarne primere mizogenije, iskreno vise u Srbiji, ali i ovde sam cula tipa koji mi se obraca sa "devojcice", I registrujem mizogeniju kad je vidim, ali stvarnu mizogeniju. Realno, u vise sportova, muski sportovi privlace vise paznje, jer su fizicki jaci, brzi...to nije mizogenija, nego meritokratija. Razumem da se zenski tim uvredio, I razumem da to sto je Trump rekao nije bilo lepo, mogao je da preskoci zenski tim u obracanju, I da kaze da imamo retki istorijski moment u kome su muski I zenski tim, istovremeno osvojili zlato. To bi bilo lepo.
djura.net Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Ne postoji nacin da ovaj covek ne izgovori neku laz u kakvoj god prilici cnn Trump has made the claim that Iran was working on missiles that could reach the US several times in recent days, though sources told CNN that the assertion is not supported by US intelligence. There is no intelligence, sources said, that Iran would soon have a missile capable of hitting the US. However, Iran does have short-range ballistic missiles that could threaten US troops and military bases in the Middle East, the sources said.
Klotzen Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Od "Završiću rat za 24h između Ukrajine i Rusije" dođosmo do otpočetog trećeg rata u nešto više od godinu dana na vlasti. Još jedan dokaz da se radi o patološkom lažovu. 6
Don Dusko Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 21 hours ago, Angelia said: sama rekla da mislim da ste preosetljivi? Na stvari poput mizogonije i rasizma nema preosetljivosti. 2 1
djura.net Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 49 minutes ago, Klotzen said: Od "Završiću rat za 24h između Ukrajine i Rusije" dođosmo do otpočetog trećeg rata u nešto više od godinu dana na vlasti. Još jedan dokaz da se radi o patološkom lažovu. I opet ce da trazi Nobela za mir, bez da trepne.
Mina D. Harker Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Don Dusko said: Na stvari poput mizogonije i rasizma nema preosetljivosti. E, tako ❤️
Angelia Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, djura.net said: I opet ce da trazi Nobela za mir, bez da trepne. Pa ima, ako se svakakve gluposti nazivaju mizogenijom I rasizmom. Gubi vrednost. 1
djura.net Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago cnn The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee is warning that President Donald Trump’s decision to take US military action against Iran will have consequences for years to come. “Against the clear wishes of the American people, President Trump has thrust our nation into a major war with Iran — one he never made a case for, never sought congressional authority for, and for which he has no endgame,” Sen. Jack Reed said in a statement. He added later: “President Trump has chosen the path of war while diplomacy was still within reach. That is a decision with consequences that will outlast this presidency.” 2
djura.net Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago bbc analysis This attack on Iran was launched by the same Donald Trump who promised American voters “no new foreign wars” and railed against previous American attempts at regime change – in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is not planning to invade Iran. He hopes he can overthrow its leadership without putting American boots on the ground. President Trump’s appetite for foreign military intervention has increased since his bombing campaign against Iran last year and the capture of Venezuela’s president last month. No Americans were killed in either of those limited actions. The attack on Iran is on an entirely different scale. And he is warning of the likelihood of American casualties as a result of this operation. Many of his own supporters may feel that this is not what they voted for. American presidents usually rely on vote in Congress to give them the authority to launch this kind of military offensive. Donald Trump did not consult them. And he is not planning to appear on television to explain why he felt the need to take action. He used a video posted on social media at 02:30 in the morning to inform the American people that he had launched a massive attack against Iran.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now