ters
Član foruma-
Posts
3,083 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by ters
-
Izgleda da je Izrael "ugasio" S-300 i S-400 mit jednom zauvijek... U jednom udaru, bez gubitaka.
-
Vjerovatno se okrece - zasluzio je svojim koketiranjem sa Pinochet-om. Ali i kod njega bi postojala gradacija i razmatranje sta je gore od dvije stvari koje obje smatra pogresnim (evo sta kaze Grok): Given Friedman's emphasis on freedom in economic transactions and his critique of government interventions that distort market signals, he might consider tariffs as fundamentally more damaging to the economic principles he advocated for, due to their widespread, systemic interference in trade. However, both policies would be criticized by Friedman for their interference with market dynamics, just at different scales and with different immediate consequences.
-
Nijemci su, sto bi se u narodu reklo, usrali motku sa VW skandalom prije deset godina. I izgubili povjerenje koje su gradili decenijama prije toga. Sami pali, sami se ubili.
-
Za Kinu hoce 60%, za Evropu i all foreign goods 10-20%.... Procitaj, poslusaj i onda nema potrebe da nagadjamo sta misli. Da li su stvari u okviru zakona? Vjerovatno. Da li je to fair - vjerovatno nije. Od osnovnog primjera Tesle kojem se isplata bonusa Musku smatra rashodom, tako da ne ulazi u profit na koji se placa porez, a kako je isplata u dionicama Tesle, onda to nije taxable ni za Musk-a privatno dok ih ne unovci... E sad, kako ce ici kada ga R2D2 naslijedi ne znam...
-
Mozda i postoji rjesenje - Jethro, Jimbo, Junior i Jolene ionako ne idu u skolu (utvrdjeno statistikom), niti kod ljekara i zubara (takodje utvrdili statistikom), ne trebaju im putevi jer rijetko idu iz Swampy Joe Bog-a, a bogami imaju i svoj arsenal oruzja tako da mozes ukinuti i troskove odbrane i pravosudja (one violent day). Eto odmah troskovi manji za pola...
-
HA-HA-HA. Smijesno je da postoje oni koji ne razumiju koliko tezinu i vaznost ima podrska nekoliko desetina dobitnika Nobelove nagrade i par stotina strucnjaka za mentalno zdravlje, kada se govori iskljucivo iz strucnog ugla. Niko ti ne moze oduzeti pravo na "gut feeling" ili emocije, niti pravo da se njima vodis u zivotu, kao sto ni slucjanim ispitanicima ne moze oduzeti pravo da misle da misle da ce Trump biti bolji za ekonomiju, ali ako 23 osobe koje su stekle sva moguca naucna zvanja u oblasti ekonomije, ili 82 osobe koje su stekle sva moguca naucna zvanja u svojim pooljima, i svoje karijere krunisala dobijanjem najveceg priznanja stave svoje ime i svoj kredibilitet iza drugacije izjave, onda mislim da je sasvim jasno da ne pricas o ekonomiji nego o necemu potpuno drugom.Potpisnicima je jasno koliko je devastirajuca Trumpov-a skica kontura plana za crtice koncepta ekonomskog programa za buducnost USA.
-
A slicno pismo su potpisali i dobitnici Nobelove nagrade u drugim poljima - njih 82 (ukljucujci i 23 gore pomenuta). Naivci koji se boje Trampuljana bez razloga, neko je izmanipulisao najvece mozgove danasnjice...Iz nekog razloga Cletus i Bubba nisu medju potpisnicima. At no time in our nation's history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. The enormous increases in living standards and life expectancies over the past two centuries are largely the result of advances in science and technology. Kamala Harris recognizes this and understands that maintaining America's leadership in these fields requires budgetary support from the federal government, independent universities, and international collaboration. Harris also recognizes the key role that immigrants have always played in the advancement of science. Should Donald Trump win the presidential election, he would undermine future US leadership on these and other fronts, as well as jeopardize any advancements in our standards of living, slow the progress of science and technology, and impede our responses to climate change. This is the most consequential presidential election in a long time, perhaps ever, for the future of science and the United States. We, the undersigned, strongly support Harris.
-
I da - da dodam jos jedan detalj na koji sam naisao trazeci NAte Silver-a (kojem niko nije prijetio zato sto predvidaj pobjedu Trumpa). Fini neki svijet ne voli cuti drugacije prognoze - koje su to sto jesu - prognoze. Three experts make shocking final predictions in the election | Daily Mail Online But polling 'Nostradamus' Allan Lichtman, a historian who’s successfully predicted every presidential election since 1984, said he stands by his earlier prediction that Harris will win. Lichtman uses a 13-point ‘Keys to the White House’ theory which relies on true-or-false questions to determine the outcome of the race. The 77-year-old has made the same announcement every election cycle, but the reaction this year has been unprecedented. He told NewsNation he and his family have received 'scurrilous, vulgar, violent and threatening' backlash to his prediction, noting he has 'never experienced anything like the hate that is being reaped upon me this time.'
-
Ovo je jedno bezvezno nagadjanje "zasto drugi pricaju da je toss-up i da je tijesno?" - jednostavno zato sto to pokazuju brojevi. Nate Silver je bukvalno rekao: "calling the race a 50-50 toss-up is the “only responsible forecast,” with polls showing the race as razor-tight in all seven key battleground states that are likely to determine the outcome." ali mu "gut feeling" (a ne brojevi) govore da ce pobijediti Trump. I slazem se sa njim - svi modeli ne mogu uzeti u obzir koliko su ljudi lakomisleni i spremni da rade u korist svoje stete - tako da i ja mislim da ce Trump biti pobjednik.
-
Kljucne rijeci - STEKLI i POSLIJE Ja nisam kupovao njihove knjige - a oni koji jesu su Obamama (ili oboma Obama) donijeli 65 miliona samo za ugovore za knjigu... Za razliku od Trumpa koji je dok je bio predsjednik valjao kape, majice i druge kineske djidje... Kasnije je poceo da valja i Biblije, satove i patike (vidio od Vucica) ali to je u redu jer nije u toku mandata...
-
Nije samo ona rekla, nego i istrazivanje organizacije stomatologa, i to ne svi Amerikanci, nego oni u crvenim drzavama... U kojima insisitraju da sami placaju zdravstevnu zastitu, obrazovanje, nece ljudi "handouts"... Dental health by state: 2024's worst and best Rk. State Total Dental Health Score 1 Connecticut 84.231 2 District Of Columbia 84.112 3 Massachusetts 80.823 4 Washington 77.186 5 Illinois 75.6107 6 New York 75.1711 7 New Jersey 75.0145 8 Maryland 73.9416 9 Hawaii 73.8184 10 Minnesota 73.11212 11 Rhode Island 72.21115 12 Michigan 71.7198 13 Utah 71.6626 14 Virginia 71.4922 15 California 71.3532 16 Wisconsin 71.21613 17 Colorado 70.71319 18 Nebraska 70.41517 19 Iowa 70.1269 20 North Dakota 69.52214 21 Ohio 69.53410 22 Idaho 68.02123 23 Oregon 67.81727 24 Vermont 67.42520 25 Pennsylvania 67.12918 26 North Carolina 66.53221 27 South Dakota 66.03124 28 Georgia 65.33625 29 New Mexico 65.12828 30 Kansas 65.03029 31 Florida 64.82336 32 Arizona 64.43533 33 Indiana 64.43930 34 Nevada 64.22734 35 Missouri 63.64331 36 South Carolina 63.43835 37 Alaska 62.12045 38 Maine 62.02441 39 New Hampshire 61.84237 40 Wyoming 61.53339 41 Delaware 60.63742 42 Tennessee 59.84438 43 Montana 59.54144 44 Texas 58.14047 45 Oklahoma 57.94640 46 Kentucky 57.94543 47 Alabama 55.74746 48 Mississippi 53.05048 49 West Virginia 50.64950 50 Louisiana 50.45149 51 Arkansas 49.14851