ObiW

Pošto su pre 80+ godina saradjivali sa nacistima, sad nemaju prava da biraju sa kim će da saradjuju?

Nije, tek je počelo drugo poluvreme.

Spreman si da žrtvuješ Ukrajinu za mir?

Da, čak iako sam skriviš nesreću.

Loš ti je primer. Lečenje od posledice saobraćajne nesreće u Americi plaća auto osiguranje a ne zdravstveno osiguranje. Račun stigne na nula dolara jer za razliku id zdravstvenog nema participacije.

Nije. Gutanje sonde i kolonoskopija je totalna tzv plitka anestezija u Americi. Plitka anestezija se koristi za intervencije koje traju pola sata sat, duboka anestezija je kada ti otvaraju stomak, grudi, itd.

Zato što od tog nekog treba da dobije to oružje, a taj neko im ga ne daje jer neće da ga Ukrajinci koriste da udaraju po Rusiji.

Ovo već postoji i jeste zajebano kada ti se telefon isprazni. Ne zato što si zaboravio kod, nego zato što koda - nema.

U našem narodu jeste. Šta tebe razlikuje od Bošnjaka? Izgledate isto, pričate isto, kultura vam je skoro identična osim što ti jedeš grah sa slaninom a on bez, što on klanja a ti se krstiš, i što se ne sahranjujete na istom groblju. Sve razlike medju vama su do religije.

Crvena Armija je bila agresor na Poljsku i Letoniju 1939. 1944. je bila oslobodilac. Ovo nije stvar slobodne interpretacije, ovo su istorijske činjenice.

Cuj, nije bilo prednosti. Ti si neki šaljivdžija, jel da? Da te neko pita “bi li 15 po turu odma sve, ili prvo 12 pa za 4 godine još 3”, šta bi izabrao?

SC kaže “sve je u redu” Update, June 29, 2021 On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court denied the ACLU and EFF's petition for certiorari in Merchant v. Mayorkas. Though it is disappointing that the Court elected not to rule on the border exception in this case, they may take the opportunity to do so in the future. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/merchant-v-mayorkas-formerly-alasaad-v-nielsen-and-alasaad-v-wolf O, da, imaju. Recimo Kanada ima celu sekciju o oduzimanju telefona, šiframa, i o tome šta mogu da gledaju: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/travel-voyage/edd-ean-eng.html “To examine the digital device, the officer will first ask for the password which will be written down on a piece of paper. You are obligated to provide your password when asked.” Ovom veselniku su Amerikanci ne samo trazili šifru, nego ga nisu ostavili na miru dok nije dao: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/ill-never-bring-my-phone-on-an-international-flight-again-neither-should-you-e9289cde0e5f/ U linku u mom prethodnom postu (koji nisi kliknula) piše: Does the government policy allow officers to keep my device? Yes. Government officers are permitted to “detain electronic devices . . .for a brief, reasonable period of time to perform a thorough border search.” “Detain a device” znači da telefon ide u jednu sobu, a ti u drugu. A nekad telefon ostane u sobi a ti odeš bez telefona kući: The plaintiffs include a military veteran, journalists, an artist, a NASA engineer,and a business owner. Several are Muslims and people of color. All were reentering the country from business or personal travel when border officers searched their devices. They were not subsequently accused of any wrongdoing. Officers also confiscated and kept the devices of several plaintiffs for weeks or months. Wait a second. What about my fourth and fifth amendment rights? Isn’t this illegal? The fourth amendment protects you against unreasonable search and seizure. The fifth amendment protects you against self-incrimination. If a police officer were to stop you on the street of America and ask you to unlock your phone and give it to them, these amendments would give you strong legal ground for refusing to do so. But unfortunately, the US border isn’t technically the US, and you don’t have either of these rights at the border. It’s totally legal for a US Customs and Border Patrol officer to ask you to unlock your phone and hand it over to them. And they can detain you indefinitely if you don’t. Even if you’re a American citizen. https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/ill-never-bring-my-phone-on-an-international-flight-again-neither-should-you-e9289cde0e5f/amp/ Bukvalno mogu ako hoće, bez da sumnjaju da si terorista. Razlika je u tome da onom kome sumnjaju da je terorista iskopiraju telefon, a onom ko nije manuelno prelistaju sadržaj telefona. Nadaj se da neće i sledećih 20 godina. A ako te ipak pitaju, daj šifru. Sud je presudio da su u pravu. Ali bukvalno je broj takvih pregleda porastao tri puta za tri godine: CBP officers conducted more than 30,000 electronic device searches in fiscal year 2018, over three times the number from fiscal year 2015 (8,503). To se radi sve češće: CBP officers conducted more than 30,000 electronic device searches in fiscal year 2018, over three times the number from fiscal year 2015 (8,503). Nadam se da sam ovoga puta odgovorio na sve nedoumice tipa “da li je ovo legalno”, “da li se ovo radi”, “može li ovo bez SC” i “šta bi sa ustavnim amandmanima”. A ako misliš da ovo što sam napisao nije tačno, stavi link gde si videla da piše suprotno. “Mene niko nije diro 20 godina” je neozbiljan argument.

Kod mene je 100% regruta iz klase upisalo fakultet. Tako je bilo u oktobarskoj klasi. Na prvom času, pita poručnik svakog od nas šta smo upisali. Regrut iz Kline kaže “filozofiju”. Pošto, blago rečeno, nije ličio na budućeg studenta filozofskog fakulteta, pita ga poručnik “šta je filozofija?”. On kaže “nauka o prirodi”. Ni ostali iz tih krajeva nisu bili mnogo bolji. Svi su ti oni bolan doneli potvrdu koju su platili po 100 maraka svako da su upisali studije, jer si u to vreme sa tom potvrdom služio vojsku 12, a bez te potvrde 15 meseci. Kako se ko snadje, što bi rekao Milenko.

Pa samo to, što si morao 24/7/365 da budeš sa njima. 😆 Sitnica. Plus si u JNA mogao i da saznaš kako izgleda primitivna ekipa iz drugih krajeva Jugoslavije, što nisi mogao u autobusu, pošti ili na ulici u mestu u kome živiš. Neprocenjivo iskustvo. Da ga nisam stekao, ne bih na vreme utekao preko bare. 😁

U Severnu Koreju ili Ameriku: On February 9, 2021, in the case of Alasaad v. Mayorkas, the First Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether it was a violation of the U.S. Constitution for government officers working for CBP or ICE to search the cell phones and other mobile devices of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents at the border. […] The court held that the government’s policy, described above, does not violate the Constitution. Border officers can continue to perform advanced searches without a warrant or probable cause and can perform basic searches without reasonable suspicion that there may be a violation of law or a national security concern. More specifically, CBP and ICE officers did not violate the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when they searched and retained their electronic devices without a search warrant or probable cause. The court reasoned that both advanced and basic searches are permissible without a search warrant (which, as noted earlier, is generally required by the Fourth Amendment) since these searches fall within the “border search exception.” This exception is based on the idea that the government has an “inherent authority to protect, and a paramount interest in protecting, its territorial integrity.” The exception is also based in the assumption that people have a lower expectation of privacy at the border than they do inside the U.S. It is important to note that the border search exception applies not just to borders, but also to their “functional equivalents,” which can include international airports or roadside checkpoints near the border. https://legalservicesincorporated.com/immigration/border-phone-search/

... jer je tu bilo mesta za njih da se smeste. Sta kaze onaj zakon u Oaklandu? Jesi ga procitao ili ja to treba da uradim za tebe?

Promice ti da je diskriminacija u Americi na osnovu etniciteta, a na osnovu dogadjanja iz proslosti, ustaljena zakonska praksa. Primer su rezervati za Indijance. Ne mozes da se tu naselis, ne mozes da kupis zemlju, na toj teritoriji jurisdikciju nema policija te drzave vec policija rezervata. Ko ima pravo da zivi u rezervatu odredjuje uprava rezervata, koju cine iskljucivo clanovi plemena, a clanstvo u plemenu se odredjuje na osnovu etnickog porekla (sto bi mi rekli "brojanje krvnih zrnaca"). Diskrimacija 1/1 koja je uredjenja zakonom u Americi. Ne vidim da protestujes protiv ovoga, verovatno zato sto za ovo prvi put sad cujes od mene. No da se ostavimo toga koliko ti o ovoj zemlji ne znas (a i ne trudis se da naucis), red je da se fokusiramo na issue at hand: da li je ovo isto ili bar slicno? Indijancima je u nadoknadu za genocid koji su pretrpeli data zemlja na kojoj zive i rade kako oni hoce, jer su isterani iz ostalih delova Amerike. Crnci nisu nikad imali svoju zemlju ali su u stvaranje ove zemlje ulozili rad koji nikada nije adekvatno kompenzovan. U tom smislu je opravdano kompenzovati ih novcano, jer se rad kompenzuje novcem. Llitigacija ovog zakona na sudu je pozeljna, jer bi teranje do Saveznog Suda dovelo do odgovora na pitanje da li je reparacija crncima legalna ili nije. Ako za 2-3 godine vidimo da je tako nesto ipak moguce sa pravne strane, ocekujem da ce Demokrate pokrenuti inicijativu da se to resi na saveznom nivou. Tako je. Paralela "belac u Americi dvadesetih godina XXI veka -- Jevrejin u Trecem Rajhu" se sama namece.

Pa ti već jesi diskriminisana. Vidiš da u Oaklandu daju pare AA, a nama belcima ne daju ništa. Najteže je biti belac u Americi.

Ja jesmo. Ja sam glasao za kandidata koji je normalan, i koji u slucaju krize ne poliva vatru benzinom nego vodom...i moj kandidat je pobedio. Onaj sto je izgubio je radio suprotno.

Mene interesuje sta predsednik ima da kaze kada u nekoj vanrednoj situaciji. Zato smo ga i izabrali.

Da nam je bivsi predsednik pobedio na izborima bilo bi obrnuto: za proslonedeljna ubistva bi rekao da su random, a za ovo bi rekao da je ciljano (terorizam!) i da je on u pravu sto muslimanima ne da da se useljavaju u Ameriku.

Boulder shooting victim: Neven Stanisic, a young man of faith and family, killed in mass shooting The 23-year-old’s parents fled Bosnia before he was born; Stanisic graduated from Alameda International Jr./Sr. High A graduate of Alameda International Jr./Sr. High, Stanisic’s family came to the U.S. as refugees in the late 1990s, according to leaders at Saint John the Baptist Serbian Orthodox Church in Lakewood. Stanisic was born in the U.S. “His family fled the war in the former Yugoslavia and everything they had was either left behind or destroyed,” said Rev. Radovan Petrovic of Saint John the Baptist. “They left everything to save their lives, and came here to have a new start.” Stanisic was likely headed home from the King Soopers on Monday after fix-it jobs inside the grocery store, Petrovic said, adding, “So he ended up being in the parking lot, in his car, when the bullet struck him. “He was an amazing child,” said Ivana Petrovic, the reverend’s wife, who had close ties with the Stanisic family. “We’ve known the family ever since we became their spiritual father and mother here. He was a very good, shy, hardworking boy and one of those kiddos who listened to his parents the best.” Stanisic’s Facebook page, which was last updated in 2016, showed him with high school classmates, smiling in a blue graduation gown and cap. The profile also contained images of hand-drawn anime characters and the Assassin’s Creed video game series. Petrovic, who has four boys of her own, said she frequently pointed to Stanisic as an example for her own kids, given that “he was such a good behaving boy.” As Serbian refugees from Bosnia, the Stanisics only wanted another shot at life for their family, which included Neven’s Colorado-based parents and his younger sister. “He was a very mild-mannered but hard-working, well-regarded young man,” Rev. Petrovic said. “(The family was) dedicated to life here, and to have his happen to him, that’s something neighbors and much of our community cannot comprehend. “These things that happen here in this country, unfortunately, it’s a specific phenomenon. I as a priest only can note that people in charge definitely need to pay attention to people needing mental health (treatment) so that these things don’t continue to happen.”

Kao covek koji je ziveo u Boulderu, mogu da ti kazem da je to mesto gde skoro uopste nema nikog osim belaca. Ako se i nadje neki, to je (verovatno strani) student na lokalnom univerzitetu, ili neko ko radi neki prost posao (recimo automehanicar), ali ko svakog dana putuje u Boulder jer je previse skupo da se tu zivi. Kada je jednom zavejao sneg odvezao sam se u servis da opravim auto i tu me je docekao menadzer kome niko od automehanicara nije dosao na posao jer su svi putevi u Boulder bili zavejani. Ovaj lik se dovezao u Boulder da bas u Boulderu ubija ljude, i zaustavio se kod prvog supermarketa u Boulderu iz pravca Denvera. Ovakvih supermarketa je mogao da nadje bilo gde usput, ali je ciljano otisao bas u Boulder. Da li zato sto je Boulder poznat kao liberalna oaza, da li zato sto je bas hteo da ubija belce, saznacemo ubrzo.

Kako je tebi kao belcu u Kaliforniji? Jel te kinje kad odes u prodavnicu?

Ja uvek pitam Teksašane koji insistiraju da mora da se sačuva istorija, šta im je najdraže u toj južnjačkoj istoriji. Odmah krenu da se vrpolje. Za Dražu makar možeš da kažeš da je spašavao pilote i dobio medalju od Trumana, za ovog južnjačkog veleizdajnika nema baš ništa osim “hteo da crnci budu roblje”.