mrd

Sto je najgore, cini mi se da ce i da postigne. Mexico ce na kraju morati da reaguje, ako nece da ima gubitke, GM ce morati da otvori proizvodnju u US, DT ce ponovo biti izabran, posto je ispostovao glavnu tezu da ce da vrati poslove u zemlju. Na stranu sta bilo ko misli o DT.

The new tariff plan is pretty simple. Starting on June 10, all goods shipped from Mexico to the United States will face an extra 5 percent tax. On July 1, that tax goes up to 10 percent. On August 1, it goes up to 15 percent. On September 1, it goes up to 20 percent. And on October 1, it goes up to 25 percent. This is a tax on all exports from Mexico to the United States, with no cutesy games or exemptions. It should, in the first instance, raise the price in the United States of Mexican-made goods. Public discussion of US-Mexico trade often picks avocados as an emblem of NAFTA-related shifts in trade patterns, but in reality they represent less than 1 percent of US imports from Mexico. The lion’s share of US-Mexico trade consists of cars, trucks, and various forms of automobile parts. In some instances, tariffs should increase the competitiveness of American car manufacturing. But in other instances, American factories are depending on supply chains that are partially located in Mexico, and the tariffs will actually hurt made-in-America cars and aid imports from Asia and Europe. That said, the US and Mexico both have currencies that float freely on international financial markets, and one immediate consequence of the tariff announcement was a rapid fall in the value of the Mexican peso. This will partially offset the increased prices to American consumers, but will also make US exports less affordable to Mexican consumers — meaning that American exporters of goods to Mexico (advanced machinery is the biggest category here) will pay a healthy share of the price for the new policy. Mulvaney was, however, at pains to say that he is not actually eager to see 25 percent tariffs imposed on Mexican imports. “We sincerely hope it does not come to that,” he said. “We actually have some level of confidence that the Mexican government will be able to help us.” Trump, by contrast, often seems to see tariffs as a virtuous end in and of themselves, so assessing whether or not Mexico is doing enough to merit suspending or removing the tariffs may turn out to be controversial. What Trump wants from Mexico McAleenan described three major asks that the United States would like to make of Mexico: He wants to see more vigorous Mexican efforts to secure the border between Guatemala and the Mexican state of Chiapas. “They need to step up their efforts on the border,” he said, alluding to the fact that this is a much shorter border than the US-Mexico one and that he believes Mexican authorities should have the ability to stop people from crossing in the first place. Second, he’s calling for a massive crackdown on the organizations that help migrants travel through Mexico to the United States. He characterized these groups as “transnational criminal organizations” and says “we need Mexico to crack down on these operations,” many of which he says are operating fairly openly, with some involving commercial bus lines. Last and potentially most significantly, he says “we want to align with Mexico on asylum” and “we need to be able to protect people in the first safe area they arrive at.” This appears to signal a desire to move beyond the current Remain In Mexico policy initiative and get Mexico to sign what’s known as a “safe third country” agreement. Such an agreement would stipulate that Mexico is a safe place for people fleeing Central America, and thus that Central Americans arriving at the US-Mexico border are not entitled to asylum hearings. Mexico has sporadically done the first and second of these things at various times, but has always been deeply reluctant to do the third. Mexico is, among other things, not necessarily a very safe place for Central American asylum seekers to be. Under questioning, however, Mulvaney would not lay out specific success criteria that he wants to see Mexico meet. Instead, he said simply that “we’re going to handle this on an ad hoc basis.” That means Trump could do anything from raise the ratchet all the way up to 25 percent to pressure Mexico to sign a safe third country agreement to backing down after Mexico does a showy short-term surge of border enforcement. The important thing, according to both Mulvaney and McAleenan, is that they want to see change fast. “We are going to judge success here by the number of people crossing the border,” Mulvaney said. “And that number of people needs to start coming down immediately in a significant and substantial way.” Da vidimo kako ce sad da se trguje. Meni bitno da ne oporezuje cigare i scotch vise, za guacamole cu sam da se snadjum. :P

Sve je dobro dok ti traze legitimaciju kad kupujes pice i cigarete. :)

Evo nagrada! Pod pokroviteljstvom Doorna:

Prvo mi je bilo bez veze, ali topic ispade veoma dobar team builder.

Mi gerijatrija posle 50 vodimo 15, so far.

U pravu si, nego se zezam. Draze mi je da me vi kritikujete zbog mojih konzervativnih i zastarelih shvatanja, nego da se s'generacijom raspravljam oko bilo cega. Ziveo.

Lako je njima da se bacaju godinama, kad ih bas briga. Ustrce uz stepenice na 3 sprat a ne zaduvaju se. :) Ne zamerite, samo sam mrd uvek. :)

Dobro je stariji si od mog starijeg sina.

Najvise ovih matorih izmedju 45-50. Bogami kriza. :)

Jednostavno, matori ste. :P

Eto i ja sam te nagazio, ma da sam varao od 50-te brojim u nazad, tako da ipak 46. :P

Kaki ste, sad sam i ja zbog peršuna počeo da vas pratim. Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

Hm, ne znas koliko si u pravu. Da nema bogatih gologuzija bi propala.

Ne razumem sta hoces da kazes? Ko odlazi, zasto? Moras nekada da citas i izmedju redova. Ovo sto si ti ovako iz jedne recenice, zakljucio samo ide u prilog tvojoj ideologiji, ali ne objasnjava nista, niti pomaze ovoj koliko toliko pristojnoj diskusiji. Ima tu, kao sto rekoh mnogo promenljivih, koje treba uzeti u obzir. Isto tako postoji i matematicko pitanje, sta je vece 1% od $2,000,000 ili 50% od $100.

Ja pretpostavljam da smo se slozili oko ovih bitnih stvari. Isto tako sam, iako veliki pristalica tax, da ne sme da se mnogo gazi ni po bogatijima. Oni ce samo da se isele i promene residence i onda nema para. Nije to samo, "Ovi kradu, daj da ih rebnem." Ima tu mnogo variabli i stepeni slobode. Ove teme tax, zeravstveno, penziono, treba stvarno diskutovati na posebnim topicima. Ne mozemo da se rasplinemo na sve to ovde. Ovo malo tabela i linkova sto smo iskopali na net-u, moze da da neku sliku troskova, ali nikako ne moze da nam pomogne da donesemo bilo koji inteligentan zakljucak.

Ovo je posebna tema: Chart Label Offense # of Inmates % of Inmates a Banking and Insurance, Counterfeit, Embezzlement 432 0.3% b Burglary, Larceny, Property Offenses 8,226 4.9% c Continuing Criminal Enterprise 349 0.2% d Courts or Corrections 714 0.4% e Drug Offenses 76,129 45.3% f Extortion, Fraud, Bribery 10,506 6.3% g Homicide, Aggravated Assault, and Kidnapping Offenses 5,459 3.3% h Immigration 11,023 6.6% i Miscellaneous 1,156 0.7% j National Security 56 0.0% k Robbery 5,978 3.6% l Sex Offenses 16,656 9.9% m Weapons, Explosives, Arson 31,240 18.6% Verovatno je i jedan od razloga sto je Obama apelovao na skidanje posedovanja droge kao offense. Drastican je podatak da je 45% zatvorenika zbog drug offenses. Kao sto rekoh o ovome se itekako da prcati. Pazi kad jedna godina zatvora kosta drzavu preko $100k, jedan ucenik u srednjoj skoli kosta $11k. Zamislite koliko bi se moglo ustedeti, da te ljude obrazujemo. Razlika u ceni $89k. Malo li je? Posle pitanje zasto da se ne povecavaju tax. Samo da se smanji broj zatvorenika i problem resen. :) link

Da, zeza se drustvo da je to no-votingFEE. Posto kaci samo drzave koje nisu glasale za DT. :)

Obrati paznju, da se ovaj deo dotice samo zaradjene sume. Ovaj odbitak od poreza zbog koga sam ja veom upset je to da se od poreze odbija, godinsnji porez koji si platio na kucu, godisnji porez na brod, ako imas, dobar deo registracije za automobil, ali je to ovaj put svedeno samo do $10k i sve preko se ne racuna. To bi bilo sve ok, da se federal tax ne racuna svuda isto. Oni koji zive u drzavi gde su nekretnine jeftine, mogu da odbiju sve sto su platili za nekretnine, plus i odbitak za kamatu. Ovi koji su u skupljim drzavama gde je prosecna kuca preko $400k, vec sa godisnjim porezom na kucu su ispucali tih $10k i sve ostalo ne mogu da odbiju. Zbog tih odbitaka je tax code veoma neprijatan za tumacenje. :)

Idi bre. Ok. Da se fokusiram na nekompetentne face. :)

Joj, mislim da je SABA prvo kupila Grundig, a posle ne znam sta se desavalo. Ovo je i vise od 30 goidna.

Nisam ja to tako mislio. Seti se sam, kako je to izgledalo, dodje padobranac, koji ne zna nista o bilo cemu bitnom za taj posao i rukovodi. Nije morao da bude iz "provincije". Nemam ja toliko toga, po pitanju grada.

Svaka drzava ima svoju stopu, a federacija preko toga ima svoju. California - Single Tax Brackets Tax Bracket Tax Rate $0.00+ 1% $8,223.00+ 2% $19,495.00+ 3% $30,769.00+ 4% $42,711.00+ 8% $53,980.00+ 9.3% $275,738.00+ 10.3% $330,884.00+ 11.3% $551,473.00+ 12.3% $1,000,000.00+ 13.3% California - Married Filing Jointly Tax Brackets Tax Bracket Tax Rate $0.00+ 1% $16,446.00+ 2% $38,990.00+ 4% $61,538.00+ 6% $85,422.00+ 8% $107,960.00+ 9.3% $551,476.00+ 10.3% $661,768.00+ 11.3% $1,000,000.00+ 12.3% $1,074,996.00+ 13.3% California Federal: Expand the filing status that applies to you. Single filers Tax rate Taxable income bracket Tax owed 10% $0 to $9,525 10% of taxable income 12% $9,526 to $38,700 $952.50 plus 12% of the amount over $9,525 22% $38,701 to $82,500 $4,453.50 plus 22% of the amount over $38,700 24% $82,501 to $157,500 $14,089.50 plus 24% of the amount over $82,500 32% $157,501 to $200,000 $32,089.50 plus 32% of the amount over $157,500 35% $200,001 to $500,000 $45,689.50 plus 35% of the amount over $200,000 37% $500,001 or more $150,689.50 plus 37% of the amount over $500,000 Married, filing jointly Tax rate Taxable income bracket Tax owed 10% $0 to $19,050 10% of taxable income 12% $19,051 to $77,400 $1,905 plus 12% of the amount over $19,050 22% $77,401 to $165,000 $8,907 plus 22% of the amount over $77,400 24% $165,001 to $315,000 $28,179 plus 24% of the amount over $165,000 32% $315,001 to $400,000 $64,179 plus 32% of the amount over $315,000 35% $400,001 to $600,000 $91,379 plus 35% of the amount over $400,000 37% $600,001 or more $161,379 plus 37% of the amount over $600,000 Plus su ove godine uveli da ne moze da se dobije odbijanje od poreza za vise od $10k na kucu i kamatu za kredite na kucu. pff.

Da stanemo ovde, izgleda da ti opet nije jasno. :) peace!