FrediB

Dr Puzigaca opet skoluje. Samo napred!

Ne zaboravi ni svemocni Vatikan i Karla Bilta....

Bogami, plebs podrzava tiranina gotovo jednoglasno. Nije mi ih zao. Naime, tokom ''zlatnih godina'', kad je nafta bila 150$ po barelu, putin ih je kupio za 800 $ mesecno, pa se to malo ''progospodilo'' , pocelo da putuje, kupuje krpice itd. A onda, cim su 2014. zbog velikoruskog imperijalizma i napada na suverenu drzavu Ukrajinu nastupile zasluzene sankcije te pad cena nafte, odma' su poceli da vriste ''Na Berlin'', ''Na Njujork'', da prete i luduju, da sire ortodoksno mracnjastvo, da histerisu. More, m's tamo, bando nelecena!

Barem ne namecu ortodoksno-srednjovekovno-totalitarno ludilo ostalim zemljama kao rusija i ne rovare svuda redom.

CIA estimates in 1990 GDP (Nominal) per Capita data in 1990, with some countries only GNP (Nominal) was provided by the CIA World Factbook.[1] No. Country (or dependent territory) GDP per capita 1990 1 Bermuda $23,000 2 United States $21,082 3 Canada $19,600 4 Norway $17,900 5 Switzerland $17,800 6 Luxembourg $17,200 7 Qatar $17,070 8 Iceland $16,200 9 Sweden $15,700 10 Japan $15,600 11 Germany $15,300 12 Finland $15,000 13 France $14,600 14 Denmark $14,300 14 United Kingdom $14,300 14 Australia $14,300 15 Italy $14,000 15 Faroe Islands $14,000 16 Netherlands $13,900 17 Belgium $13,700 18 Austria $13,600 19 United Arab Emirates $11,680 20 New Zealand $11,600 21 Kuwait $10,500 22 Singapore $10,300 23 Spain $10,100 24 Aruba $10,000 24 Hong Kong $10,000 24 Nauru $10,000 24 Cayman Islands $10,000 25 The Bahamas $9,875 26 German Democratic Republic $9,679 27 Brunei $9,600 28 Soviet Union $9,211 29 Northern Mariana Islands $9,170 30 United States Virgin Islands $9,030 31 Greenland $9,000 32 British Virgin Islands $8,900 32 Ireland $8,900 33 Israel $8,700 34 Czechoslovakia $7,878 35 Guam $7,675 36 Isle of Man $7,573 37 Bahrain $7,550 38 Portugal $6,900 39 French Polynesia $6,400 40 Macau $6,300 41 Hungarian People's Republic $6,108 42 Cyprus $6,100 43 Oman $6,006 44 Taiwan $6,000 45 New Caledonia $5,810 46 People's Republic of Bulgaria $5,710 47 Greece $5,605 48 Puerto Rico $5,574 49 Antigua and Barbuda $5,550 50 Netherlands Antilles $5,500 51 Yugoslavia $5,464 52 Libya $5,410 53 Barbados $5,250 54 American Samoa $5,210 55 Malta $5,100 56 Turks and Caicos Islands $5,000 57 Saudi Arabia $4,720 58 South Korea $4,600 59 Polish People's Republic $4,565 60 Gibraltar $4,450 61 Reunion $4,290 62 Montserrat $3,780 63 Seychelles $3,720 64 Martinique $3,650 65 Socialist Republic of Romania $3,445 66 Anguilla $3,350 67 Guadeloupe $3,300 68 St. Kitts and Nevis $3,240 69 French Guiana $3,230 70 Suriname $3,215 71 Gabon $3,200 72 Trinidad and Tobago $3,070 73 Uruguay $2,950 74 Venezuela $2,700 75 Brazil $2,500 76 South Africa $2,380 77 Malaysia $2,270 78 Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands $2,260 79 Algeria $2,235 80 Argentina $2,217 81 Cook Islands $2,200 82 Mexico $2,165 83 Cuba $2,000 84 Chile $1,970 84 Paraguay $1,970 85 Iraq $1,940 86 Mauritius $1,910 87 Iran $1,800 88 Jordan $1,760 89 Fiji $1,750 90 Panama $1,648 91 Costa Rica $1,630 92 Botswana $1,600 93 Syria $1,540 94 Grenada $1,535 95 Jamaica $1,529 96 Federated States of Micronesia $1,500 96 Marshall Islands $1,500 97 Dominica $1,408 98 Turkey $1,350 99 St. Vincent and the Grenadines $1,305 100 Belize $1,285 101 St. Lucia $1,258 102 Namibia $1,245 103 North Korea $1,240 104 People's Socialist Republic of Albania $1,200 105 Guatemala $1,185 106 Thailand $1,160 107 Colombia $1,110 108 Tunisia $1,105 109 Djibouti $1,070 110 El Salvador $1,020 111 People's Republic of the Congo $1,000 111 Niue $1,000 111 West Bank $1,000 112 Cameroon $955 113 Ecuador $935 114 Ivory Coast $900 115 Papua New Guinea $890 115 Honduras $890 116 Morocco $880 116 Mongolian People's Republic $880 116 Peru $880 117 Tonga $850 118 Vanuatu $820 118 Yemen Arab Republic $820 119 Tokelau $800 120 Dominican Republic $790 121 Swaziland $750 122 Egypt $700 122 Lebanon $700 123 Senegal $680 124 Maldives $670 125 Bolivia $660 126 Gaza Strip $650 127 Philippines $625 128 Western Samoa $615 129 People's Republic of Angola $600 130 Tuvalu $530 130 Zambia $530 131 Mauritania $520 132 Kiribati $500 132 Solomon Islands $500 133 South Yemen $495 134 Cape Verde $494 135 Wallis and Futuna $484 136 Comoros $475 137 Nicaragua $470 137 Zimbabwe $470 138 Central African Republic $453 139 Indonesia $430 140 Guyana $420 141 Pakistan $409 142 Togo $405 143 India $400 143 Ghana $400 144 Liberia $395 145 Haiti $380 146 People's Republic of China $370 147 Sri Lanka $370 148 Kenya $360 149 Guinea $350 150 Sao Tome and Principe $340 151 Sudan $340 152 People's Republic of Benin $335 153 Niger $330 154 Rwanda $325 155 Uganda $300 156 Equatorial Guinea $293 157 Burma $280 158 Nigeria $270 159 Burundi $255 160 The Gambia $250 161 Sierra Leone $250 162 Lesotho $245 163 Tanzania $235 164 Mali $220 165 Socialist Republic of Vietnam $215 166 Somali Democratic Republic $210 167 Democratic Republic of Afghanistan $200 168 Bhutan $199 169 Zaire $195 170 Chad $190 171 Malawi $180 172 Bangladesh $180 173 Burkina Faso $170 174 Guinea-Bissau $160 175 Nepal $158 176 Madagascar $155 177 Lao People's Democratic Republic $150 178 People's Republic of Kampuchea $130 179 People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia $130 180 People's Republic of Mozambique $110

Nije to pitanje dopingovanja , vec vise da se bagra izoluje i otera u Sibir gde joj je i mesto. Pijandure i nasilnici koji nisu umeli da se integrisu u globalni svet kao Kina, Indija itd. vec samo da lome, pijance, divljaju i rovare po komsiluku. Neces da budes civilizacija - nazad u dzunglu. Zato je to.

Opa bato: https://www.b92.net/sport/olimpizam/vesti.php?yyyy=2019&mm=12&dd=09&nav_id=1628324

Potemkinova sela...

Varlamov bolje da se pazi... Pre dve godine su ga gadjali farbom u lice, sad mogu i necim mnogo gorim....

Murmansk, Omsk, Saratov, Mahackala, Irkutsk, Arhangeljsk, Novosibirsk van centra, Vladivostok van centralnih delova .... pakao zivi. Ne mora se ici tamo da bi se videlo, dovoljno je posetiti Instant Street View i uveriti se. Ili sajt Varlamov.ru. Manja mesta su tek sacuvaj Boze. I da, snimci nisu iz neke 2009. vec relativno novi, 2015-2016 pa navise.

I on i onaj preispoljni fašista feridž.

U vukoj**instvu, citaj takmicenju ko ce se vise uvuci drugom karakorumu... pardon Trecem Rimu.

Russia – a threat against Europe forever? Understanding the historical development of the Russian state Miltiades Varvounis 1 April 2015 If anyone wants to understand why Russia has always been a mortal threat against the West, it is essential to examine the historical development of the Russian state. With the exception of the Central European peoples, westerners often consider Russia through the sphere of the Soviet Union and the Second World War. But we must look further back if we wish to understand the Russian nation and Kremlin’s long-term imperialistic aims and motivations. A Byzantine-Asiatic culture A simple explanation of the historically cultural elements and traditions that have influenced Russia and its civilization is much needed here. The confrontation between Russia and the Free World is often portrayed as a clash between East and West; and since the rise of Russia as a world power, the country has always been considered a representative of Asianism. Historical analysis, however, has revealed that Russia has a complex identity, a Byzantine-Asiatic one, which stands in sharp contrast with the values of the Western civilization. The Byzantine Empire, indeed, contributed to the shaping of the country’s political culture and social organization by providing Russians with the gift of Orthodoxy. The millennium-old strong and unbroken presence of the Orthodox faith in Russia resulted in an ultra-conservative, anti-intellectual, anti-democratic, and xenophobic worldview that kept Russia isolated from the West for a number of centuries. But one should remember that Mongols and Tatars ruled Russia from the thirteenth to the fifteenth century. These warriors of the steppe brought despotism, backwardness and ignorance to Russia. And it was this painful experience that caused Russia’s traditional adherence to the curbing of freedom and also Kremlin’s hostile attitude towards neighboring states. The effects of the Mongol rule over Russian lands were profound and it influenced greatly the political, social, and religious facets of Russia. The very Mongolian cultural impacts are still evident today in Russia from on the language to on the form of the government. Had the chance been given to experience the Renaissance, as had the other European states, the political, religious and social thought structure of Russia would presumably differ greatly today than it really is now. However, despite the fact that the Russians became a more Asiatic nation in political and cultural terms as the result of the Mongol oppression, their deep Christian roots helped them maintain a link to Europe. The Mongol yoke contributed to the course that Russian culture, political geography, history, and national identity would take. Nevertheless, the negative anti-western aspects of Russian political culture come not only from the Mongol Empire but also from the Byzantine world. Therefore, Byzantinism and Orthodoxy became deeply integrated with Asianism. This all-embracing Byzantinism-Asianism, a system of military theocracy-autocracy characterized by a Messianic imperialistic ideology, led to tragic results for the Russian people: a despotic state that subjugated the unfortunate Russians a long time ago and is continuing to do so. It is no wonder why the Tsarist Russia and Soviet Union were called “the prison of the peoples” and “the prison of the nations.” To sum up, many analysts have wondered if Russians are a part of Europe. Undoubtedly, Russia has been connected to Europe for centuries. It is evident that geographically and culturally, the Russian people are actually “Eurasians” with a unique Byzantine-Asiatic mentality, not found elsewhere. However, the desperate effort of Russia to portray itself as a pure European did not prevent Russians to be hostile to the West in cultural, social and political dimensions, despite the admirable efforts of Peter the Great, actually a ruthless despot, to transform his semi-Asiatic barbaric nation into a completely modern westernized and European one. Russia’s imperialistic ambitions The most important idea for Russians from the fall of Byzantium until today is the idea of empire and they think they are an imperial nation with a holy mission to realize. Russian history is an unbroken chain of endless territorial expansion, bloody annexation, suffering and tragedies of conquered ethnic groups. The idea of empire has been always one of the most precious ones in Russian ideological lore and it is this that Russians proudly proclaim to other nations, especially their European and Caucasian neighbors, who had suffered for a long time under the Kremlin’s totalitarian rule. The history of Russian imperialism began in the sixteenth century. From its very beginning, Russian expansion was steeped in the religious doctrine of the “Third Rome,” which was borrowed from the Byzantine tradition. However, the holy mission to “liberate” Constantinople, the Dardanelles, and the Balkans had to be postponed for the future. All of the Russian state’s aggressive wars of invasion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were against its numerous neighbors – the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Sweden, Livonia, the Khanates of Crimea, Kazan, Astrakhan, and the nomadic tribes of Siberia. The territories which Russia acquired through her imperialistic wars from the eighteenth century to the early twentieth century (and during the Soviet period), such as Poland, Baltic States, Central Asia, Caucasus, Crimea and Finland, had no common aspects with the rest of Russian territory. These conquered regions were so different from the Russian authoritarian state in all conceivable aspects such as nationality, culture, traditions, and religion. For that reason, several cases of enforced Russification took place in most of the occupied areas, including the Eastern-Central European ones at the same time as the fact that tribes such as the Uralic and Volga-Finnic peoples were completely assimilated and their cultures disappeared. It also has to be mentioned that the control of the Polish and Lithuanian lands by the Tsarist Russia (and later by the USSR) always threatened the fragile European balance of power and it proved disastrous for the West on several occasions since the nineteenth century. Poland, the heart of Europe, was not called Antemurale Christianitatis (Bulwark of Christendom) without a reason. The Poles did not only defend the values of the Western civilization from the Ottomans, but also from the Russian Empire’s anti-western holy divine mission (or the USSR’s anti-western mission of global Communist revolution) to expand itself against the Latin heretics and pluralism of the West. The most important characteristic of the Russian and Soviet imperialism has always been the maximization of territorial expansion for the realization of economic, cultural and political interests as it has been one of the important principles of state policy. Moreover, it is not an exaggeration to say that the despotic states of Tsarist Russia and the USSR were built on the corpses of the non-Russian conquered peoples, who suffered for centuries under the yoke of the Kremlin’s imperialistic domination. Russian paranoid mentality Apart from the Russian expansionist agenda, a paranoid “besieged by the West” mentality has characterized the foreign policy and strategic thinking of the Kremlin for centuries. This anti-western dimension of Russia has a deeper layer. We have to keep in mind that Russia’s national identity has historically been shaped in opposition to its traditional military enemies – its European neighbors. The specific root of this phenomenon is linked to Catholicism that was historically perceived by the Russians as an obstacle to their Orthodox Messianic mission. However, Russia did not only invade, but also was invaded a few times. The Russians saw all foreign invaders – Polish and Lithuanian forces, Napoleon – as hateful symbols of Western civilization that tried to destroy the last bastion of Orthodoxy. The Kremlin’s manipulation efforts of public opinion always try to emphasize those invasions, repeating ad nauseam for decades that the West is plotting to encircle Russia and invade and destroy the Russian “exceptional soul.” So what is the main objective of Russian deceptive propaganda? It is the method of the aggressor playing the victim by using the classic “the West wants to dismember Russia and control her resources” motto. And such methods are enough to turn the tables by turning the invaders into victims in the eyes of the public. This kind of rhetoric enables effectively the Russian elites to officially justify their aggressive foreign policy by presenting it as defense-through-attack. Another problem for the West is that Russia has established an image of being a champion of conservative values. Since the West is in decline, where political correctness, ultra-progressivism, unlimited materialism and globalization threaten the moral and traditional values of the Western civilization, Russia follows the steps of militant Islam by taking advantage of the West’s moral decay. To achieve its purposes, Russia seeks to be a great ally for European conservatives and right-wing political parties on issues like defending the values of family and religion against a tide of liberal “pro-gay” progressive way of life without limits. Clearly, the Kremlin’s ambitious – but unrealistic – aim is to control several European countries, marking an end to American hegemony over Europe and also the end of the dominant power of the Free World. Nevertheless, Russia’s target audience is not only the right-wing fringes of western politics but also people in what was once called the Soviet sphere of influence in the ex-Eastern Bloc, the Middle East and even Africa. Russian academics, diplomats and journalists with the assistance of several dangerous European apologists or fifth columnists have taken an active role, building a powerful coalition of pro-Russian conservative circles. No need to analyze further why these Moscow’s European influential “agents” (who can be found in Central European countries as well) are the Russia’s Trojan Horse into the West. Ultra-conservative values, international diplomacy, effective propaganda and “information aggression” by Moscow’s great-in-size trolling armies and western fifth columnists with a political or academic voice are apparently the main fields where the Kremlin is exercising its international influence. Conclusion Unfortunately for the Free World, Russia is decisively back as a dangerous major global player, glorifying nationalism and militarism that once again threaten peace and stability in Europe. No matter how hard the European apologists of Kremlin try to excuse Russia’s imperialistic foreign policy, History is not on their side; for History tells us that since the sixteenth century, the Tsarist Russia, the USSR and post-Soviet Russia, traditional enemies of the values of democracy and freedom have been responsible for nearly sixty wars of aggression against its neighbors. In its nature, Russian civilization is anti-western and it is based on antagonism towards foreign civilizations and especially towards values such as democracy, civil liberties, individualism, and humanism. Undoubtedly, Russian identity belongs to a non-western civilization “code” as a successor of the Byzantine Empire. Russia will only be able to move forward and become a successful member of the new world of the twenty-first century by embracing completely western values, thus abandoning Byzantine-Asiatic totalitarianism and the “Third Rome” expansionist ideology. But what price Europe will have to pay for that almost impossible transformation is entirely another matter. Miltiades Varvounis is a prominent Greek-Polish historian and freelance writer, with a thorough knowledge of the history of Central Europe. He has written several books in Greek and English, including “Jan Sobieski: The King Who Saved Europe.” Miltiades Varvounis https://visegradinsight.eu/russia-a-threat-against-europe-forever01042015/

To bi oni videli kao ''Boziju volju i promisao'' . Posledica ne komunizma, ne turske okupacije, vec padanja u istorijsku slepu ulicu - uticaj zatucane istocne despotije vizantije.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4KRv89_K3o

Rusiji je Kosovo Srbija samo zato sto im Srbija treba jedino kao kamencic u cipeli EU i NATO, tj. kao moneta za potkusurivanje s istima.

Jeste, i zato su DR Kongo i Nigerija najbogatije zemlje na svetu, a ne Nemacka, Japan, J. Koreja, Svedska... oni su glupi sto proizvode konkretnu industrijsku hi-tech robu. 😁

Vau , kakav uspeh, opet izvoz sirovina te eventualno nekog poluproizvoda.....

Pozdrav svima! :)