Boxy

Poklonila NDj knjigu, dobila cokoladu, mislim da je to odlicna trampa

To su hejterski postovi, to nije za fan temu

Znala sam da nije ok, ipak forumasi bolje znaju u kakvom je stanju bio Fed posle onakvog meca...

Je l sad ok? Ili to sto je stavio svoj potpis, nema veze, forumasi bolje znaju...

Juce Nadal ovo postavio na fejsu, ljudi prokomentarisali da mu je mnogo dosadno u sobi

Kjudineli napisao kolumnu o povlacenju Feda, ako nekog uopste zanima da cita With regard to Wimbledon Federer had no choice It is questionable that a player can preventively abandon a Grand Slam tournament. Nevertheless, Roger's withdrawal from Paris is absolutely understandable for me if he doesn't want to endanger his season highligh Roger Federers - officially declared as a precautionary measure - withdrawal before the round of 16 of the French Open was not only talked about in the tennis world. While the comments in Switzerland, with a few exceptions, were positive and pro-Roger, more criticism was felt internationally. But what actually happened? In tennis, there are withdrawals because of injuries every week somewhere. Less often before the start of the match, mostly during a game, as happened a few days ago with the other Swiss in the third round, Henri Laaksonen. In contrast to the vast majority of such "walk overs", as we call forfait defeats in tennis jargon, this time the "walk over" concerned a major tournament and came from a world star whose grand slam comeback the entire tennis world was eagerly waiting for. Beside that, it was carried out preventively and not due to an acute injury. I cannot remember that a player ever abandoned a Grand Slam tournament out of prevention and it seems very questionable at first glance. In Paris, this happened twice within a week, if Naomi Osaka's waiver in order to avoid any winner / loser interviews for the benefit of her mental health is also to be called preventive. With Roger's decision, however, it is worth taking a closer look. Then it becomes clear that this makes perfect sense. Due to comparable experiences with knee problems, which forced me to undergo a complicated knee operation in 2007 and 2008, combined with an 18-month break, I can empathize with Roger's situation. A comeback after such a long time is - despite the carefully planned and over a longer period of advanced training - always a tightrope walk and fraught with many question marks. While training units can be precisely controlled and, if necessary, adjusted, these possibilities do not apply to a comeback athlete in a competition. This knowledge alone causes the athlete to be much more tense in a match situation and the body to react more strongly as a result. For me, it was normal for my knee to swell up a little in the evening after the long-awaited comeback in the first tournaments, as is usual with inflammations. When I fell asleep, I asked myself whether this irritation would subside overnight or whether I might have to take a few days off after all. At the beginning, my fear and scepticism were great, but mostly everything was OK again the next morning. The more matches and tournaments I was able to play, the calmer I was able to go to bed in the evening despite a slightly swollen knee. This, in turn, allowed me to focus more and more on other things from week to week which it takes to win matches. Roger's withdrawal in Paris, where he didn't give himself a chance to win this year, is therefore very understandable for me. In order to be in top form on time for his personal highlight of the season at Wimbledon, he needs two things beforehand: On the one hand, he has to regain complete confidence in his body during match situations. On the other hand, he needs match practice in order to be ready in London in the event of a more difficult draw than in Paris. However, the total focus on match practice only succeeds when 100 percent trust in the body is available again. The starts in Doha on hard courts and in Geneva and Paris on clay were clearly there for Roger to regain confidence in his body and thus tick off the first item on his comeback list. Now that he seems to have this confidence again, it is up to him to turn to the second point with match practice. With regard to Wimbledon, this in turn ideally takes place on grass, in his case in Halle from next week. In order for this to happen successfully on the special playing surface, Roger needs a few days of recovery after Paris, followed by several training sessions on grass. Since Halle takes place every year directly after Paris, this only works for those players who were not there in Paris until the very end. Roger has also canceled three times at short notice from Halle in the past because he made it to the final in Paris without this being a problem at Wimbledon. In a “normal” year, Roger would have played through in Paris, as in the past, and then renounced Halle because he would have accumulated enough match practice on different fast surfaces since January. In this special year, Roger urgently needs as many matches as possible in Halle if he wants to shine on his preferred surface. This left him no choice but to make this unpopular forfait decision.

Lepo ja rekoh da igra dubl jer mecevi u singlu kratko traju, dubl je duplo duze trajao

kakav poen za kraj

Iga igra dubl jer se u singlu isuvise kratko zadrzi na terenu

Ko je kriv Kepferu sto ga nije pobedio? Federer je sam izjavio da nije ocekivao da pobedi 3 meca, izvagao je i shvatio je da ako izadje sa Beretinijem, moze da se povredi, a njegov princip je da ako izadje, onda ne predaje. Pa valjda ga treba postovati sto se drzi svog principa, a ne zeleti da izadje, pa da preda posle par gemova ili jos gore da se povredi i pozdravi sa karijerom. Da je obrnuti raspored, Nadal bi uvek gledao na W kao na pripremu za RG, isto kao sto Fed gleda na RG, ne vidim sta je tu strasno. Sigurno je Djokovicu AO mnogo drazi nego RG i da su blizu, on bi mu bio prioritet. A gledali smo Frica na ovom turniru, bukvalno se povredio u poslednjem poenu meca, otisao mu meniskus, mora na operaciju, napustio teren u kolicima.

Ja nisam nikad razapinjala Djokovica zbog lakta, jesam da je glup sto nece operaciju, ali nisam zbog povrede. Nije prvi put da se neko povuce sa slema, ali jeste prvi put da se Fed povuce sa slema i onda ste svi digli dreku. Valjda on najbolje zna svoje telo i zna da ako izadje na teren, a nije dovoljno oporavljen da je sansa da se povredi poprilicno velika...usotalom, to bi trebao da zna svako ko se makar malo razume u sport, a koliko znam, mi smo na sportskom forumu.

Dobro je sto ovde svi znaju da njega nista nije bolelo, da je predao eto tek tako, da je posle 3.5h bio svez i odmoran kao da mu to nije 3. mec od povratka posle duple operacije kolena

Neka ga kazne, kao da bi to promenilo njegovu odluku da stavi zdravlje na prvo mesto

Vidim ja da bi vama bilo najpostenije da je izasao, sjebao kolenmo i zavrsio karijeru, onda bi vam srce bilo na mestu.

Nije se on povukao zato sto su male sanse da pobedi Beretinija, nego zato sto rizikuje povredu. Ali vec sam danas napisala, treba razumeti te finese, 40-godisnja legenda sa duplom operacijom kolena koji se povlaci pre meca i na vreme i klinac od 19 godina koji ne zeli da se blamira

Otkud znam, Fed sigurno nije, jer nije nikad predao mec, a da je izasao na teren.

Onda nije ni trebao da izlazi, jer da se ugledao na Federera, ne bi predao tokom meca, posto ovaj to nikad nije uradio. Mozda mu je neko drugi uzor, neko koje to radio

Kad bude napunio 40 godina, imao 2 operacije, nije bitan kakav uspeh iza sebe, onda i moze da se ugleda na njega

Publika je gledala njegov raspada 45 minuta, ali bi ostavilo nesagledive posledice po istu da je gledala jos 2 minuta tog raspada...ja makar tako shvatam

I posle se Federer napada

3 identicna meca Nadala i Sinera, prvi set Siner se bori, ima veliku sansu da osvoji set, ali to ne iskoristi, u nastavku se raspadne, pa onda pokaze neke salbe znake zivota, ali Nadal to brzo sredi.

Hahahahahaa, koliko nesposobni ljudi