kironepraktičar

JJST Memorial Fun Fact of the Night RJ Barrett had his first career 30-point game today, scoring 32 in the win. At 20 years, 272 days old, he is the youngest Knick to score 30 in a win since the BAA became the NBA! The last Knick younger than RJ to score 30 in a win was Carl Braun, who was 20 years, 139 days old when he scored 32 in an 86-63 win over the Providence Steamrollers on February 11, 1948. Home of the Jared Jeffries Shot Tracker and recipient of a P&T PhD edit pt2 šta vam je elfrid kriv info

e ako vidim još jednom ovo, poderat ću si lice samo na toj tekmi je imao i boljih i važnijih poteza

možda i jača prva petorka od naše, klupa slabija za mladog bodirogu edit hoću reći, svaka čast dikiju, psdu, saletu - litvanci su imali dva najbolja igrača na terenu u tom trenutku

radije bih se kladio na pokuševskog nego na toppina

nema brige oko toga. kada malo ojača fizički i šut će postati stabilniji niti umem da uočim tanane razlike niti se trudim ali nemam dileme da će već sledeće sezone to biti bolje. kakvi sve antitalenti danas učine šut konstantnim, poku će to brzo

kako misliš smešan. forma mu je okej. haliburton ima smešan šut npr ali ulazi

osećam da lord of terror opet nije uhvatio tekmu rj barretta : i

ja sam u fazonu da su vasa micić i lendri neki rod

ma sranje je bila ta seyona, sledeca je bila super koji zalog za buducnost, lik ima 4 godine do penzije

dada, zaboravih. ali nije poslednji ulazak u plejof, to sam hteo da kažem

nisu knicksi igrali playoff kada je lin bio nego kasnije, 2012e/13e valjda. glup je osećaj jer je trebalo lepo da zabodemo top5 pika na draftu umesto što se zamlaćujemo

frenki je mnogo lepši, eye test ti je ovde vredniji od naprednih statsa

od vojislava samo šešelja znam

od lukića samo vladan

tonite

sram te bilo. pippen je lep ali na ekstreman način. grubijan romantičnog srca. lepota nije modelsice kategorija, to valjda znate. pogledaj trejoa i pippena pa uporedi. trejo je pičkica.

@madafaka73 mogu da se složim sa solidnim delom tvrdnji ali to zapravo nije previše uvezano sa diskusijom ovde. naravno da je liga menjala pravila, ko će drugi da ih menja - ali su se čak i sama pravila menjala zbog određenih igrača. shaq je verovatno najočigledniji primer a nije ni od kulina bana. moja priča je bila prosta i nevezana za pravila; određeni igrači donose nove trendove, čak i megatrendove, pošto ponešto od toga traje 10-15 godina. te igrače uzimaju za uzor franšize pri odabira strategije, igrača ili formiranja igrača. te igrače uzimaju za uzore klinci kada o svom trošku nešto pokušavaju i vežbaju bez da su čak krenuli i da treniraju taj sport. ti igrači ne moraju biti najbolji ni u svojoj generaciji ali se pristup igri benduje po njihovom primeru, jer izgledaju kao primer koji može doneti uspeh u tadašnjem kontekstu, ma kada on bio i postojao. šta je kontroverzno kod trougla?

najružniji su trejo i kevin knox & obojica ne znaju difens daklem, ružnoća dolazi delom i od defanzivnih nedostataka. ostatak otpada na nečiste misli i klanjanje sotoni

piše na rotoworldu i rotowireu

@maXa88maksimilijane, uzmi frenkija, rose i rivers su out, elf i quickley questionable

The Strickland is proud to publish a second excerpt from its first book, “Fred From Fresh Meadows: A Knicks Memoir” by Fred Cantor. Again, we’re pleased to say that all of the royalties are going to the John Starks Foundation, whose mission is to provide “monetary grants to NY tri-state and Tulsa area college bound high school seniors who demonstrate academic excellence, financial need and a commitment to community service.” . I fully admit to being a big Pat Riley fan long before he became the Knicks’ head coach in May of 1991. That’s largely due to the Showtime Lakers’ style of play, which I very much enjoyed tuning into when I wasn’t watching the Knicks play. Yes, I realize, Riley had a star-studded roster but, still, he got them to maximize their potential as a team—and that’s a real skill, especially when you have to handle superstar egos. But I was a fan of his also because his teams beat the Celtics in two out of three NBA Finals matchups. OK, it really should have been three out of three but I can’t put the blame primarily on Pat for the Lakers, in essence, giving away the title to the Celtics in 1984. And, the bottom line: after that potentially psychologically devastating 1984 Finals and a humiliating Game 1 loss to the Celtics in 1985—the infamous “Memorial Day Massacre”—the Lakers rebounded not only to win the series that year, but they did it in style by closing it out on the parquet floor of Boston Garden. And then, in 1987, the Lakers provided one of the great moments in both Boston Garden and NBA Finals history with Magic Johnson’s junior, junior sky hook en route to another NBA title. That too was incredibly satisfying. So naturally I was thrilled when Riley was named the Knicks’ head coach in May of 1991. And, even though Pat’s teams didn’t win a championship during his time in New York, I think his combined record in LA and New York compares favorably with the coaching record of the man who was long considered the greatest coach in league history, Red Auerbach. And that’s primarily because Pat did something I don’t think Auerbach ever demonstrated: as Bum Phillips once said about Bear Bryant, “He can take his’n and beat your’n and then take your’n and beat his’n.” Could two teams be more different in style of play than the 1980s Lakers and the Knicks from the years 1991-95? With different personnel, Riley adapted his coaching strategy in certain respects and yet still had great success—coming this-close to the mountaintop. And if you take a close look at Auerbach’s record including his time with the Celtics pre-Bill Russell and do the same with Pat Riley’s record to include his post-Showtime experience in New York, I think you will get a better sense of what I’m talking about. (And this is probably the best way to make the comparison because Auerbach retired after the 1965-66 season and Riley had no head coaching stint prior to taking over the Lakers.) For starters, I will of course concede that Auerbach’s teams winning eight consecutive NBA titles and nine out of ten was a run second to none in NBA history. It will in all likelihood never be matched. And part of the reason it will never be equaled is because there is—and has been for decades—more balance in the league than in the early years. When Pat Riley’s Lakers teams won four NBA championships in seven years (including the first repeat title in almost 20 years), there were clearly more competitive challenges than Auerbach’s Celtics had to face. Did any of Auerbach’s teams have to face the types of formidable opponents with the depth of talent that the Lakers had to battle? During the Celtics’ streak of nine titles in ten years, they had seven or eight future Hall of Famers virtually every season, which was a real edge in talent over opposing teams of that era. Plus, there were far more rounds of playoffs in the 1980s than during the great run by Auerbach’s teams and thus, more opportunities for an upset by a lesser opponent. One could make a strong argument that it was a tougher playoff gauntlet in the 1980s than the late 1950s into the first half of the 1960s, when Auerbach’s Celtics reigned. But where the comparison gets really interesting is when you look closely at Auerbach’s time with the Celtics pre-Russell (six years) and Riley’s time in New York post-Magic Johnson (four years). In those six years, even though Auerbach’s teams featured the premier guard of that era (and one of the all-time legends of the game), Bob Cousy, their best regular-season finish in the Eastern Division— which typically consisted of five teams during that time—was only second place. The Celtics had three 2nd-place finishes and three 3rd- place finishes. Perhaps more significantly, the Celtics lost three times in the first round of the playoffs during that time and their best success was merely advancing to the next round before being eliminated in the other three years of the pre-Russell era. By way of contrast, Riley’s Knicks won the Atlantic Division title twice in four years and finished in second place the other two seasons. In four postseasons: his teams won three playoff series in 1994, two playoff series in 1993, and one playoff series in both 1992 and 1995. It would seem Riley demonstrated greater coaching success than Auerbach in the absence of his greatest star or stars. Riley’s first season in New York provided unequivocal evidence of his ability to transform his customary ways and to immediately make the most of very different personnel; this was perhaps best exemplified in Game 5 of the opening-round best-of-five series against the Detroit Pistons. I have been to physical games before but, in the opening minutes of Game 5, the Knicks made clear that they were not going to be intimidated by the Pistons and they showed that they could out-Bad-Boy the Bad Boys if need be. The Knicks even succeeded in making an impression on Bill Laimbeer, who was quoted in the next day’s edition of The New York Times: “Hopefully, the league will let them be physical with Chicago.”

ako će zbog njega ružni ljudi prestati da se bave košarkom, onda jeste. ali to je trenutno work in progress

molim da se na moj spisak ubaci pola safetovih