Jump to content

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, wwww said:

Pariz i WTF bez poraza  - bice ispred Novaka 590 bodova

Sada je ostala još samo ova opcija.

 

Pametan je Medvedev sa izbegavanjem turnira koje nose malo bodova, biće vremena za prvo mesto, već sledeće godine. Novak će svakako pasti sam zbog svojih godina. 

 

Novak da zaokruži samo još ovu godinu sa prvim mestom i to mu je dovoljno u karijeri. Sledeće godine je već nerealno da se juri prvo mesto čitave godine, iako bi možda imao municije za tako nešto, ipak glavni prioritet bi trebalo da ostanu samo slemovi. U zavisnosti šta Novak uradi na AO, ako ne osvoji, verujem da će prvo mesto pustiti niz vodu.

Edited by Dracarys
Link to post
Share on other sites

ima i opcija (teoretski) da odigra jos i Bec ili St Petersburg (ili Stokholm), ali uzimajuci u obzir razlog koji je naveo za povlacenje iz Moskve to nije realisticno.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Novaku su rezultati iz IV "legli" kao i oni martovski iz Majamija, svi potencijalni konkuretni doziveli brodolom. Ovo njegovo neigranje Masters turnira ove sezone do sada nije donelo previse nevolja sto se liste tice. Medvedev samo 1730 bodova, Cicipas 2350, Zverev 2460. Novak 690.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

ako su proracuni tacni, Novak teorijski moze izgubiti i prvo mesto na rejsu i br.1 na zvanicnoj listi do kraja godine, samo pod sledecim okolnostima:

 

da ne odigra nista do kraja sezone,

da u preostale 4 atp sedmice Medo i Cici igraju sva 4 finala (Bec 500, Pariz 1000, Stokholm 250 i Torino 1500),

i da grk pobedi u sva 4.

 

u tom slucaju bi Medvedev zavrsio prvi na rejsu, a Cicipas izbio na celo atp liste i docekao novu godinu kao 1. igrac sveta.

 

Jolita kaze da ceka zvanican izlazak zreba za Bec bez Mede pa ce objaviti, tako da je to verovatno to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ma Grka ne bih računao iz principa. Nemoguće je da on bude prvi.

 

Medvedev 100% neće igrati Beč i sve će se svesti na Pariz i Torino.

 

Medvdedev mora da osvoji Pariz da bi ostao u igri za YE#1 i to da ne igra protiv Novaka, tj. da on kiksne u drugom, trećem kolu.

 

Novak samo ako se oklizne na koru od banane i povredi se, Medvedev tada ima šansu da završi kao prvi, a i tad će biti preteško, jer treba imati makar finale Pariza i osvojen WTF.

 

Čak i da se desi neki neočekivan poraz, tu je opet svakako Torino gde se opet može imati poraz da bi se prošla grupa.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, wwww said:

@Yolitatennis

RANKINGS UPDATE FOR THE#NOLEFAM

It is now mathematically impossible for Novak to lose the #1 ranking before January 10, 2022.

 

 

pade Panco kao zrela kruska … sad i formalno 🙂

 

ostaju rejs trka i ITF dodele ali to ne menja stvari posto novu godinu docekuje kao #1

 

jos jedno kolosalno postignuce .....

 

 

Novak Djokovic      2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2018, 2020, 2021.

Pancho Gonzales   1952, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960.
William Renshaw   1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1889.
Bill Tilden               1920, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1931.
Rod Laver              1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970.
Pete Sampras        1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998.
Ken Rosewall         1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1970.
Jimmy Connors     1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1982.

* an undisputed number one player for the year is shown in bold
  (without another player regarded as co-number one)

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Cojep said:

 

 

pade Panco kao zrela kruska … sad i formalno 🙂

 

ostaju rejs trka i ITF dodele ali to ne menja stvari posto novu godinu docekuje kao #1

 

jos jedno kolosalno postignuce .....

 

 

Novak Djokovic      2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2018, 2020, 2021.

Pancho Gonzales   1952, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960.
William Renshaw   1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1889.
Bill Tilden               1920, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1931.
Rod Laver              1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970.
Pete Sampras        1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998.
Ken Rosewall         1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1970.
Jimmy Connors     1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1982.

* an undisputed number one player for the year is shown in bold
  (without another player regarded as co-number one)

ako sam dobro shvatila:

bold znaci da je teniser zavrsio godinu i kao #1 na ATP listi, a i proglasen je od ITF-a kao najbolji te godine (zbog najboljeg performansa na GS-ovima),

a obicna "slova" znace da je neko drugi uzeo jednu od ove dve "titule" gore.

jesam li dobro shvatila?

 

u tom slucaju bi trebalo da je Novak vec obezbedio i ITF "titulu" najboljeg ove godine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Quote

From 1973 onward: merit-based ATP rankings

 

In August 1973 the ATP introduced its own rankings. These were published 11 times that year and with increasing frequency the following years until 1979 when from that year on they were published weekly. In the 1970s and 1980s they did not take into account certain events, such as the Davis Cup, the WCT Finals and the Masters (currently named the ATP Finals. Since 1990 the ATP does award points for ATP Finals. As well, the ATP point rankings did not award the Grand Slam tournaments which most often attracted the most top-ranked players in the world (Wimbledon and the U.S. Open) and, therefore, were the most valuable to win in the minds of both players and tennis journalists, a number of points commensurate with their importance. Some events[which?] which did not attract many or even a couple top-ranked players but offered high prize money were worth a higher number of points than their perceived importance.

 

 

Quote

Disputed rankings

Other rankings proposed by tennis experts or by the players themselves could be more accurate because they included these events and adjusted the rankings to reflect the actual importance of particular tournaments. From 1973 to 2006 this list sometimes differs from the ATP list because it shows journalists (or even players) rankings released at the time and not the computer-based point rankings. In particular, Connors has been ranked No. 1, at the end of the year, from 1974 to 1978 by the ATP but the majority disagreed with the computer rankings: in 1975 leading journalists including John Barrett, Bud Collins, Barry Lorge and Judith Elian ranked Arthur Ashe as the No. 1 in the world while his ATP ranking was only 4th; in 1977, no one, except the ATP ranking, considered that Connors was the best player in the world, and everyone thought that Borg and Vilas were the top two tennis players; and in 1978 everyone and, in particular, the ITF recognized that Borg was the World Champion. In 1982 and 1989, respectively, Connors and Becker, both winners of Wimbledon and the US Open, were considered as World Champions even though the ATP ranked McEnroe and Lendl as No. 1 in those years. Since the mid-'90s the ATP rankings have generally been accepted by many as the official rankings (but in 1999 many considered Sampras as the second best player in the world while the ATP ranked Kafelnikov 2nd). Since 1978 the ITF (represented at the beginning by Sedgman, Hoad and Trabert) has designated its World Champion.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...